The art of vaginal birth after caesarean section: a retrospective observational study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20250199Keywords:
Trial of labour after caesarean, Vaginal birth after caesarean section, Caesarean deliveryAbstract
Background: There is an alarming rise in caesarean section rate worldwide. Our study aims to highlight the factors contributing to successful vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC) in our institution over a period of 4 years.
Methods: Our study is a retrospective observational study. 149 patients who underwent successful VBAC during the period of November 2022 to October 2024 were included in the study and their demographic characteristics, labor progress, maternal and neonatal outcomes studied.
Results: Out of the total 149 patients, 91% of patients were admitted with spontaneous onset of labor pains. Admission Bishop's score was >3 for 87% of patients. Majority of patients (95%) progressed in labour with low dose oxytocin. 7% of patients had gestation diabetes mellitus (GDM), 3% had gestational hypertension highlighting the fact that these are not contraindications for trial of labour after caesarean (TOLAC). There was no maternal and neonatal morbidity or mortality.
Conclusions: With proper case selection, antenatal counselling and adequate pain relief - TOLAC can result in successful VBAC. VBAC is a safe alternative to elective repeat caesarean section in patients with one previous caesarean section. Increasing VBAC deliveries can reduce the overall caesarean section rate and reduce the morbidities associated with repeated caesarean sections.
Metrics
References
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. National Family Health Survey 2015-16. Available at: https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR339/FR339.pdf. Accessed on 12 October 2024.
Tripathy B, Jena A, Pandey AK, Mishra SS, Mishra C. Caesarean Section Delivery in India: A Comparative Assessment of Geographical Variability Using Nationally Representative Survey Factsheet Data. Natl J Community Med. 2023;14(4):260-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55489/njcm.140420232650
International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5), 2019-21: India. National Family Health Survey, India. 2021. Available at: https://mohfw.gov.in/sites/default/ files/NFHS-5_Phase-II_0.pdf. Accessed on 12 October 2024.
Cragin EB. Conservation in obstetrics. N Y Med J. 1916;104-3.
RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 45. Available at: https://www.rcog.org.uk/guidance/browse-all-guidance/green-top-guidelines/birth-after-previous-caesarean-birth-green-top-guideline-no-45/. Accessed on 12 October 2024.
National Institutes of Health Consensus Development conference statement: vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights March 8-10, 2010. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(6):1279-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e459e5
Little MO, Lyerly AD, Mitchell LM, Armstrong EM, Harris LH, Kukla R, et al. Mode of delivery: toward responsible inclusion of patient preferences. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112(4):913-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181888fd8
Mazzoni A, Althabe F, Liu NH, Bonotti AM, Gibbons L, Sánchez AJ, et al. Women's preference for caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. BJOG. 2011;118(4):391-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02793.x
Okada H, Kuhn C, Feillet H, Bach JF. The 'hygiene hypothesis' for autoimmune and allergic diseases: an update. Clin Exp Immunol. 2010;160(1):1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2249.2010.04139.x
Bach JF. The effect of infections on susceptibility to autoimmune and allergic diseases. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(12):911-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra020100
ACOG Practice bulletin no. 115: Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(2 Pt 1):450-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181eeb251
Scott JR. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a common-sense approach. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(2 Pt 1):342-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182245b39
Wadhwa Y, Alghadir AH, Iqbal ZA. Effect of Antenatal Exercises, Including Yoga, on the Course of Labor, Delivery and Pregnancy: A Retrospective Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(15):5274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155274
Metz TD, Stoddard GJ, Henry E, Jackson M, Holmgren C, Esplin S. Simple, validated vaginal birth after cesarean delivery prediction model for use at the time of admission. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(3):571-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31829f8ced
Robson MS. Classification of Caesarean Sections. Fetal Maternal Med Rev. 2001;12:23-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0965539501000122
Robson MS. Can we reduce the caesarean section rate? Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;15:179-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/beog.2000.0156
Bhardwaj M, Gainder S, Chopra S, Bagga R. Assessment of outcome of trial of labour after caesarean in a tertiary hospital based setting: prospective observational study. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynaecol. 2023;12(6):1856-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20231568
Landon MB, Leindecker S, Spong CY, Hauth JC, Bloom S, Varner MW, et al. The MFMU caesarean registry: Factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous caesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:1016-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2005.05.066
Demianczuk NN, Hunter DJ, Taylor DW. Trial of labor after previous cesarean section. Prognostic indicators of outcome Am J Obestet Gynaecol. 1982;142:640-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(16)32433-4
Pickardt MG, Martin JN, Maydrech EF. Vaginal birth after caesarean delivery: Are the useful and valid predictors of success or failure? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166:1811-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(92)91572-R
West HM, Jozwiak M, Dodd JM. Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;6(6):CD009792. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009792.pub3
Sharma S, Menia V, Bedi J, Dogra S. Labor Analgesia: An Unmet Right of Laboring Women in India. J South Asian Feder Obst Gynae. 2013;5(1):26-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10006-1214
Zhang H, Liu H, Luo S, Gu W. Oxytocin use in trial of labor after cesarean and its relationship with risk of uterine rupture in women with one previous cesarean section: a meta-analysis of observational studies. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03440-7
Geller SE, Goudar SS, Adams MG, Naik VA, Patel A, Bellad MB, et al. Factors associated with acute postpartum hemorrhage in low-risk women delivering in rural India. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008;101(1):94-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.08.025
Rozen G, Ugoni AM, Sheehan PM. A new perspective on VBAC: a retrospective cohort study. Women Birth. 2011;24(1):3-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2010.04.001
Atia H, Ellaithy M, Altraigey A, Kolkailah M, Alserehi A, Ashfaq S. Mechanical induction of labor and ecbolic-less vaginal birth after cesarean section: A cohort study. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;57(3):421-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2018.04.017
Shatz L, Novack L, Mazor M, Weisel RB, Dukler D, Rafaeli-Yehudai T, et al. Induction of labor after a prior cesarean delivery: lessons from a population-based study. J Perinat Med. 2013;41(2):171-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2012-0103
Patel S, Kansara V, Patel R, Anand N. Obstetric and perinatal outcome in previous one cesarean section. J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016;5(9):3141-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20163002
Liu S, Liston RM, Joseph KS, Heaman M, Sauve R, Kramer MS; Maternal Health Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term. CMAJ. 2007;176(4):455-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.060870
Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Thom EA, et al; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(6):1226-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000219750.79480.84
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
