Fetomaternal outcomes beyond 40 weeks of gestation: a retrospective study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20250203Keywords:
Late-term pregnancy, Post-term pregnancy, Maternal outcomes, Neonatal outcomes, Induction of labor, Retrospective studyAbstract
Background: Pregnancies extending beyond 40 weeks, categorized as late-term (40–41+6 weeks) or post-term (≥42 weeks), are associated with increased risks of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. This study aims to evaluate and compare fetomaternal outcomes in late-term and post-term pregnancies.
Methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted at the department of obstetrics and gynecology, Chettinad health and research institute. Medical records of 300 women aged 18-45 years, who delivered after 40 weeks of gestation between January 1, 2023, and December 31, 2023, were analyzed. Exclusion criteria included teenage pregnancies, elderly gravida (>45 years), past caesarean sections, and breech/transverse presentations. Data on demographic characteristics, induction methods, maternal and neonatal outcomes, and complications were collected and statistically analyzed using SPSS version 25.0.
Results: Out of 300 participants, 225 (75%) delivered at late-term, while 75 (25%) delivered post-term. Caesarean delivery rates were higher in post-term pregnancies (55%) compared to late-term (35%) (p<0.01). Maternal complications, including postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) (15%), perineal tears (10%), and uterine rupture (5%), were significantly more prevalent in post-term pregnancies (p<0.05). Neonatal complications were also higher in post-term deliveries, with increased rates of macrosomia (30% vs. 15%), NICU admissions (27% vs. 15%), and meconium-stained amniotic fluid (40% vs. 20%) (p<0.01). Stillbirths were exclusive to post-term pregnancies (7%).
Conclusions: Post-term pregnancies are associated with significantly higher maternal and neonatal risks compared to late-term pregnancies. Timely induction of labor and enhanced surveillance in pregnancies beyond 40 weeks are crucial to minimizing complications. These findings support the implementation of evidence-based management strategies to improve fetomaternal outcomes in prolonged pregnancies.
Metrics
References
Caughey AB, Sundaram V, Kaimal AJ, Yvonne CW, Allison G, Sarah EL, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor. Evidence Rep Technol Assessment. 2009;176:1-257.
Boulvain M, Irion O, Dowswell T, Thornton JG. Induction of labour at or beyond 37 weeks’ gestation for improving health outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2016(10):CD004945.
Mandruzzato G, Antsaklis A, Botet F, Frank AC, Francisc F, Amos G, et al. Intrauterine restriction (IUGR). J Perinat Med. 2008;36(4):277-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/JPM.2008.050
Zhang J, Troendle JF, Mikolajczyk R, Sundaram R, Beaver J, Fraser W. The natural history of the normal first stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(4):705-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181d55925
Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM, Alan T NT, Robert MS, Gail M, et al. Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(6):513-23.
Wennerholm UB, Saltvedt S, Wessberg A. Induction of labor versus expectant management in post-term pregnancies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019;98(10):1311-9.
Caughey AB, Sundaram V, Kaimal AJ, Christina B. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(4):823-32.
Reddy UM, Ko CW, Willinger M. Term pregnancy: a period of heterogeneous risk for infant mortality. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(6):1279-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182179e28
Heimstad R, Skogvoll E, Mattsson LA, Johansen OJ, Eik-Nes SH, Salvesen KÅ. Induction of labor versus serial antenatal monitoring in post-term pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial. BJOG. 2007;114(2):191-8.
Smith GC, Pell JP, Dobbie R. The risks of delivery at early term, late term, and post term. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(2):152.e1-8.
Dekker GA, Chan A, Luke CG, Priest KR. The role of induction in post-term pregnancies. Am J Perinatol. 2013;30(9):711-6.
Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM, Alan TNT, Silver RM, Mallett G, et al. Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(6):513-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1800566
Zhang J, Klebanoff MA, DerSimonian R. Stillbirth and the risk of late-term and postterm pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98(4):656-62.
Morken NH, Skjaerven R, Magnus P. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of post-term birth: a population-based study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-172
Bailit JL, Joseph GF, Kleinman S. Outcomes of term induction in postterm pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(4):690-94.
Bishop EH. Pelvic scoring for elective induction. Obstet Gynecol. 1964;24(2):266-8.
Stock SJ, Ferguson E, Ford I, Dobbie R, Pell JP, Smith GC. Induction of labour at 41 weeks or beyond. BMJ. 2012;344:e2838. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e2838
Keulen JK, Bruinsma A, Kortekaas JC. Management of late-term and post-term pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(4):438-45.