Ectopic pregnancy: an analysis of risk factors, diagnosis and management

Authors

  • Navya Manohar Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Kelambakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Sai Latha Ramanujam Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Kelambakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20250506

Keywords:

Ectopic pregnancy, Tubal pregnancy, Risk factors, Diagnosis, Management, Maternal morbidity

Abstract

Background: Ectopic pregnancy (EP), implantation outside the uterine cavity, is a leading cause of first-trimester maternal morbidity and mortality. Tubal pregnancies constitute over 90% of cases, with risk factors including pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), assisted reproductive technologies (ART), and delayed childbearing. Advances in transvaginal ultrasonography and β-hCG assays have improved early detection, but challenges in diagnosis and management persist. This study examines trends, risk factors, and management outcomes of EP at Chettinad medical college, Kelambakkam.

Methods: A retrospective, non-interventional study of 50 EP cases (Jan 2023-June 2024) analyzed patient demographics, clinical presentations, and treatment outcomes. Descriptive and inferential statistics (Chi-square test, p<0.05) were used for analysis via SPSS.

Results: The mean age was 29.02 years (23-35). Abdominal pain (13 cases) was the most frequent symptom, followed by the classic triad (12 cases). Prior EP (13 cases), PID, and ART were primary risk factors. Unruptured EPs (17 right, 12 left) were more common. Medical management (19 cases) was initially used, but 15 required surgery post-failure. No significant correlation was found between risk factors and symptoms (Chi-square=57.64, p=0.85).

Conclusions: EP predominantly affects reproductive-age women, with abdominal pain as the primary symptom and prior EP as the main risk factor. Diagnostic advancements improve outcomes, but challenges remain in optimizing medical management and recurrence prevention. Future research should refine diagnostic markers and treatment strategies to reduce morbidity and mortality.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Barnhart KT. Ectopic pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(4):379-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcp0810384

Creanga AA, Syverson C, Seed K, Callaghan WM. Pregnancy-related mortality in the United States, 2011-2013. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(2):366-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002114

Bouyer J, Coste J, Fernandez H, Pouly JL, Job-Spira N. Sites of ectopic pregnancy: A 10-year population-based study of 1800 cases. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(12):3224-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.12.3224

Condous G. Ectopic pregnancy: Challenging accepted management strategies. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2007;34(3):403-19.

Tay JI, Moore J, Walker JJ. Ectopic pregnancy. BMJ. 2000;320(7239):916-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7239.916

Pappalardo EM, Alexander J, Vavilov R. Diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy: A practical approach. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2018;45(3):353-64.

Brady PC. New evidence to guide ectopic pregnancy diagnosis and management. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2017;72(10):618-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/OGX.0000000000000492

Hoover KW, Tao G, Kent CK. Trends in the diagnosis and treatment of ectopic pregnancy in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(3):495-502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181d0c328

Condous G. Ectopic pregnancy: Challenging accepted management strategies. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2007;34(3):403-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2007.07.001

Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Medical treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(5):S206-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.08.049

Jurkovic D, Wilkinson H. Diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy. BMJ. 2011;342:d3397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d3397

Chukus A, Tirada N, Restrepo R, Reddy NI. Uncommon implantation sites of ectopic pregnancy: Thinking beyond the complex adnexal mass. Radiographics. 2015;35(3):946-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2015140202

Barnhart KT, Simhan HN. Advances in the medical management of ectopic pregnancy. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010;1205:96-100.

Flanagan HC, Duncan WC, Lin CJ, Spears N, Horne AW. Recent advances in the understanding of tubal ectopic pregnancy. Faculty Rev. 2023;12:26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12703/r/12-26

Downloads

Published

2025-02-26

How to Cite

Manohar, N., & Ramanujam, S. L. (2025). Ectopic pregnancy: an analysis of risk factors, diagnosis and management. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 14(3), 791–796. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20250506

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles