Correlation of mid-trimester cervical length in primigravida with preterm labour

Authors

  • Archana Chaurasia Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Swami Dayanand Hospital, New Delhi, India
  • Shaheen Bano Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, ABVIMS and Dr RML Hospital, New Delhi, India
  • Aarti Jeenwal Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, ABVIMS and Dr RML Hospital, New Delhi, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20250872

Keywords:

Cervical length, Preterm labour, Primigravida

Abstract

Background: Preterm birth is the leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality that is not linked to congenital anomalies or chromosomal disorders. Studies have shown that a short cervix is a significant predictor of preterm birth in both singleton and twin pregnancies, with the risk of spontaneous preterm birth rising as cervical length decreases.

Methods: It is a prospective, observational, cross-sectional study conducted over a period of 18 months. The sample size was 500. The cervical length was measured using transvaginal ultrasound between 16 to 24 weeks period of gestation. These participants were followed up till delivery and the correlation of mid-trimester cervical length was done with preterm labour.

Results: The mean age of patients was 23.8±3.6 (range, 17-37 years). The mean body mass index (BMI) of patients was 22.6±2.7 (range, 17-33). The mean period of gestation at which trans-vaginal ultrasound was done was 19.6±8.34 weeks. The mean cervical length in patients with pre-term deliveries was 2.7±0.54 and in term deliveries was 3.2±0.43 cm, respectively. The difference in cervical length between the two groups was statistically significant (independent t-test, p<0.001).

Conclusions: There is an inverse relationship between cervical length measured by transvaginal ultrasound at 16 to 24 weeks of gestation and risk of preterm delivery.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Hownson CP, Kinney MV, Lawn JE, editors. March of Dimes, PMNCH, Save the children, WHO. Born too soon: the global action report on preterm birth. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2012

Blencowe H. Born too soon: the global epidemiology of 15 million preterm births. Reproductive Health. 2013;10(1):32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-10-S1-S2

World Health Organization. Preterm birth. World Health Organization Fact Sheet. Available at: https://www.who.int. Accessed on 22 November 2024.

Moutquin JM. Classification and heterogeneity of preterm birth. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;110:30–3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-0328(03)00021-1

Berghella V. Universal cervical length screening and vaginal progesterone prevents preterm birth in singleton pregnancies without a prior preterm birth: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecol. 2017;49(3):303–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.17388

Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:567. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199602293340904

Hassan SS, Romero R, Berry SM, Dang K, Blackwell SC, Treadwell MC, et al. Patients with an ultrasonographic cervical length≤15 mm has nearly a 50% risk of early spontaneous preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182:1458–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2000.106851

Dilek TU, Yazici G, Gurbuz A, Tasdelen B, Gulhan S, Dilek B, et al. Progressive cervical length changes versus single cervical length measurement by transvaginal ultrasound for prediction of preterm delivery. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2007;64:175–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000106486

Hernandez-Andrade E, Romero R, Ahn H. Transabdominal evaluation of uterine cervical length during pregnancy fails to identify a substantial number of women with a short cervix. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25:1682. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2012.657278

Naim A, Haberman S, Burgess T, Navizedeh N, Minkoff H. Changes in cervical length and the risk of preterm labour. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:887-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2002.123058

Berghella V, Tolosa JE, Kuhlman K, Weiner S, Bolognese RJ, Wapner RJ. Cervical ultrasonography compared with manual examination as a predictor of preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177:723–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70259-X

Andrews WW, Copper R, Hauth JC, Goldenberg RL, Neely C, Dubard M. Second-trimester cervical ultrasound: associations with increased risk for recurrent early spontaneous delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:222–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006250-200002000-00010

Tanvir, Ghose S, Samal S, Armugam S, Parida P. Measurement of cervical biometry using transvaginal ultrasonography in predicting preterm labour. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2014;5(2):369-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-9668.136189

Priyadarshani P, Kaur G. Predicting preterm labour by cervical length measurement. Int J Rep, Contra, Obst and Gynaecol. 2016;5(6):1809-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20161667

Downloads

Published

2025-03-27

How to Cite

Chaurasia, A., Bano, S., & Jeenwal , A. (2025). Correlation of mid-trimester cervical length in primigravida with preterm labour. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 14(4), 1260–1264. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20250872

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles