Clinical method of foetal weight estimation: a comparable alternative to ultrasound method in a low resource setting

Francis C. Opara; Lucky C. Lohnan; Tunde-Olatunji O. Abidemi; Ojurongbe A. Olubisi

doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20250846

Authors

Francis C. Opara Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dalhatu Araf Specialist Hospital, Lafia, Nasarawa, Nigeria
Lucky C. Lohnan Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dalhatu Araf Specialist Hospital, Lafia, Nasarawa, Nigeria
Tunde-Olatunji O. Abidemi Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Federal Medical Centre, Keffi, Nasarawa, Nigeria
Ojurongbe A. Olubisi Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Federal Medical Centre, Keffi, Nasarawa, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20250846

Keywords:

Ultrasound, Clinical, Foetal weight, Birth weight, Lafia

Abstract

Background: Foetal weight estimation is of utmost importance to obstetricians in the management of pregnant women during the antenatal and intrapartum period. This study aimed at determining reliable method of foetal weight estimation, (sonographic or clinical), that closely predicts the actual birth weight in booked pregnant women in Lafia, North Central, Nigeria.

Methods: It was a cross-sectional comparative study carried out among 259 pregnant women recruited by consecutive sampling from September 2019 to January 2020 in the antenatal and labour wards of the hospital. The Dare’s formula was used to estimate the clinical foetal weight of the participants while the ultrasound foetal weight was estimated using the Hadlock 3 formula (BPD, AC and FL). The actual birth weight of each neonate was measured using the standardized Waymaster digital weighing scale. Qualitative variables were presented in means, median and standard deviation. Categorical variables were presented in frequencies and percentages. The absolute errors were tested with Chi square, paired t test, Mann Whitney U and Spearman’s rank correlation. A p<0.05 considered statistically significant.

Results: The mean actual birth weight of neonates was 3074.5±398.4g. The results did not show any significant difference in the mean of estimated foetal weights using ultrasound and clinical methods when compared with the actual birth weights.

Conclusions: There was no significant difference between the mean weight obtained through clinical and ultrasound estimation and actual birth weight. Clinical foetal weight estimation is as reliable as ultrasound weight estimation.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Ugwu EO, Udealor PC, Dim CC, Obi SN, Ozumba BC, Okeke DO, et al. Accuracy of clinical and ultrasound estimation of fetal weight in predicting actual birth weight in Enugu, Southeastern Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2014;17(3):270-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1119-3077.130208

Bossak WS, Spellacy WN. Accuracy of estimating fetal weight by abdominal palpation. J Reprod Med. 1972;9:58-60.

Hanretty KP, Neilson JP, Fleming EE. Re-evaluation of clinical estimation of fetal weight: a comparison with ultrasound. J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990;10:199-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/01443619009151157

Nzeh DA, Oyawoye O, Adetoro OO. Ultrasound estimation of birth weight in late pregnancy among African women. West Afr J Ultrasound. 2000;1:9-14.

Chauhan SP, Hendrix NW, Magann EF, Morrison JC, Jenney SP, Devoe LD. Limitations of clinical and sonographic estimation of birth weight: experience with 1034 parturients. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;91:72-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00590-5

Bajacharya J, Shrestha NS, Karki C. Accuracy of prediction of birth weight by fetal ultrasound. Kathmandu Univ Med J. 2012;10(38):74-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/kumj.v10i2.7349

Pourhoseingholi MA, Vahedi M, Rahimzadeh M. Sample size calculation in medical studies. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2013;6(1):14-7.

Dare FO, Ademowore AS, Ifaturoti OO, Nganwuchu A. The value of symphysiofundal height/abdominal girth measurement in predicting fetal weight. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1990;31:243-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7292(90)91018-L

Shittu AS, Kuti O, Orji EO, Makinde NO, Ogunniyi SO, Ayoola OO. Clinical versus sonographic estimation of foetal weight in South West Nigeria. J Health Popul Nutr. 2007;25(1):14-23.

Njoku C, Emechebe C, Odusolu P, Abeshi S, Chukwu C, Ekabua J. Determination of Accuracy of Fetal weight Using Ultrasound and Clinical Fetal Weight Estimations in Calabar, South South Nigeria. Int Scholarly Res Notices. 2014;1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/970973

Parvathavarthini K, Santhanalakshmi C, Geetha P. Comparative study of various methods of foetal weight estimation at term pregnancy in a tertiary hospital in Kanchipuram Tamil Nadu, India. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7(4):1602-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20181363

Buck Louis GM, Grewal J, Albert PS, Sciscione A, Wing DA, Grobman WA, et al. Racial/ethnic standards for fetal growth: the NICHD Fetal Growth Studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(4):449.e1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.032

Baum J.D, Gussman D, Stone P. Clinical and patient estimation of fetal weight vs. Ultrasound estimation. J Reprod Med. 2002;47:194-8.