Delayed cord clamping versus intact umbilical cord-milking and its effects on maternal blood loss: a randomised controlled trial

Authors

  • Kanchibhotla Meghana Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Mrutyunjaya B. Bellad Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, KLE’s Dr. Prabhakar Kore Hospital, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belagavi, Karnataka, India
  • Chakrala R. Kumar Department of Pediatrics, Narayana Hrudayalaya Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
  • Bhavana Koppad Department of Pediatrics, KLE’s Dr. Prabhakar Kore Hospital, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belagavi, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20250723

Keywords:

Cord clamping, Milking, Maternal blood loss, Postpartum hemorrhage

Abstract

Background: The ideal timing of cord clamping has been controversial and debated over decades. Delayed cord clamping has many advantages owing to enhanced placental transfusion on neonates but provides limited evidence on maternal postpartum blood loss. The objective of the study was to estimate the maternal blood loss after delayed cord clamping versus umbilical cord milking.

Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted in KLE’s Dr. Prabhakar Kore Hospital, at Belagavi district in Karnataka over 18 months. In the delayed cord clamping (group A- DCC) group, the cord was clamped 60 seconds after the delivery of a newborn. In the intact umbilical cord milking (group B- UCM) group, cord blood was milked 5-8 times for 15-20 seconds towards the neonate. The primary outcome of the study was to estimate the maternal blood loss by comparing the change in hemoglobin and hematocrit values before and after delivery. Furthermore, neonatal outcome was assessed by comparing serum ferritin at third month of life.

Results: Maternal blood loss was estimated by a drop in post-delivery hemoglobin, showed a significant difference between the two groups (group A-DCC group=1.76±0.1 gm% and group B-UCM group=1.73±0.1 gm%; p<0.001). Additional administration of uterotonics for medical management of the cases also showed a significant difference (p=0.049) with higher usage among the DCC group.

Conclusions: From the present study, it was observed that umbilical cord milking was equally effective and time-saving with the advantages of delayed cord clamping with reduced estimated maternal blood loss.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Wormer KC, Jamil RT, Bryant SB. Postpartum Hemorrhage. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. 2024.

Gupta R, Ramji S. Effect of delayed cord clamping on iron stores in infants born to anemic mothers: a randomized controlled trial. Indian Pediatr. 2002;39(2):130-5.

Ceriani Cernadas JM. Timing of umbilical cord clamping of term infants. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2017;115(2):188-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5546/aap.2017.eng.188

Katheria AC, Lakshminrusimha S, Rabe H, McAdams R, Mercer JS. Placental transfusion: a review. J Perinatol Off J Calif Perinat Assoc. 2017;37(2):105-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2016.151

Wang M. Iron Deficiency and Other Types of Anemia in Infants and Children. Am Fam Physician. 2016;93(4):270-8.

Rashwan A, Eldaly A, El-Harty A, Elsherbini M, Abdel-Rasheed M, Eid MM. Delayed versus early umbilical cord clamping for near-term infants born to preeclamptic mothers; a randomized controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1):515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04831-8

Ruangkit C, Leon M, Hassen K, Baker K, Poeltler D, Katheria A. Maternal bleeding complications following early versus delayed umbilical cord clamping in multiple pregnancies. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1781-6

Rhoades JS, Wesevich VG, Tuuli MG, Macones GA, Cahill AG. Implementation and Outcomes of Universal Delayed Umbilical Cord Clamping at Term. Am J Perinatol. 2019;36(3):233-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1669908

Panburana P, Odthon T, Pongmee P, Hansahiranwadee W. The Effect of Umbilical Cord Milking Compared with Delayed Cord Clamping in Term Neonates: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Womens Health. 2020;12:301-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S233487

Purisch SE, Ananth CV, Arditi B, Mauney L, Ajemian B, Heiderich A, et al. Effect of Delayed vs Immediate Umbilical Cord Clamping on Maternal Blood Loss in Term Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019;322(19):1869-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.15995

Celen S, Horn-Oudshoorn EJJ, Knol R, van der Wilk EC, Reiss IKM, DeKoninck PLJ. Implementation of Delayed Cord Clamping for 3 Min During Term Cesarean Sections Does Not Influence Maternal Blood Loss. Front Pediatr. 2021;9:662538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.662538

Ravishankar S, Migliori A, Struminsky J, Has P, Sung CJ, He M. Placental findings in feto-maternal hemorrhage in livebirth and stillbirth. Pathol Res Pract. 2017;213(4):301-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2017.02.005

De Paco C, Herrera J, Garcia C, Corbalán S, Arteaga A, Pertegal M, et al. Effects of delayed cord clamping on the third stage of labour, maternal haematological parameters and acid-base status in fetuses at term. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;207:153-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.10.031

De Angelis C, Saccone G, Sorichetti E, Alagna M, Zizolfi B, Gragnano E, et al. Effect of delayed versus immediate umbilical cord clamping in vaginal delivery at term: A randomized clinical trial. Int J Gynaecol Obstet Off Organ Int Fed Gynaecol Obstet. 2022;159(3):898-902. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.14223

Jaiswal P, Upadhyay A, Gothwal S, Singh D, Dubey K, Garg A, et al. Comparison of two types of intervention to enhance placental redistribution in term infants: randomized control trial. Eur J Pediatr. 2015;174(9):1159-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-015-2511-y

McDonald SJ, Middleton P, Dowswell T, Morris PS. Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping of term infants on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013(7):CD004074. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004074.pub3

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Delayed Umbilical Cord Clamping After Birth. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 684. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(1):e5-e10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001860

Qian Y, Ying X, Wang P, Lu Z, Hua Y. Early versus delayed umbilical cord clamping on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019;300(3):531-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-019-05215-8

Mangla MK, Thukral A, Sankar MJ, Agarwal R, Deorari AK, Paul VK. Effect of Umbilical Cord Milking vs Delayed Cord Clamping on Venous Hematocrit at 48 Hours in Late Preterm and Term Neonates: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Indian Pediatr. 2020;57(12):1119-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-020-2064-7

Katheria A, Reister F, Essers J, Mendler M, Hummler H, Subramaniam A, et al. Association of Umbilical Cord Milking vs Delayed Umbilical Cord Clamping With Death or Severe Intraventricular Hemorrhage Among Preterm Infants. JAMA. 2019;322(19):1877-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.16004

Downloads

Published

2025-03-07

How to Cite

Meghana, K., Bellad, M. B., Kumar, C. R., & Koppad, B. (2025). Delayed cord clamping versus intact umbilical cord-milking and its effects on maternal blood loss: a randomised controlled trial. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20250723

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles