A precarious outcome of incidentally diagnosed Krukenbergs tumor in antepartum eclampsia case: a rare case report and review of literature

Authors

  • Kalaivani Thirupathi Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Government Villupuram Medical College and Hospital, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Jayalakshmi Mega Nathan Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Government Thiruvarur Medical College and Hospital, Tamil Nadu, India https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1179-6193

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20251601

Keywords:

Krukenbergs tumor, Ovarian tumor, Metastasis, Pregnancy, Gastric carcinoma

Abstract

Kruckenbergs tumors are the rare metastatic tumors of ovary with its incidence of 1-2%. It’s occurrence along with pregnancy is very rare with reported incidence of 0.4-0.5%. The occurrence of Krukenbergs tumors along with gestational hypertension is also very rare and it has poor prognosis. The most common primary origin is from gastric site. We report a case of 28‑year‑old pregnant female presented with Antepartum Eclampsia with incidental findings of bilateral enlarged ovaries during caesarean section. The diagnosis of Krukenbergs tumor was made with histopathology and it’s primary origin was rendered by postoperative gastroscopy guided biopsy.  Our case is enthralling in view of its unusual presentation, young age, and the diagnostic dilemma it poses. Our case report highlights the fact that early diagnosis of Krukenbergs tumor in pregnancy may be difficult at times owing to the masquerading effects, implying widespread metastasis and a poor maternal survival.  Tumor resection with concomitant Chemotherapy was given as treatment. The main aim of this paper is to evaluate whether earlier diagnosis can be made in such cases. A thorough literature review was also conducted, unfortunately no methods can be used for early detection. Furthermore, no consensus regarding diagnostics or treatment avail till date. Hence the need for more research regarding this rare condition to offer recommendations about early detection, diagnosis and therapeutic approaches can be prompted.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Jayalakshmi Mega Nathan, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Government Thiruvarur Medical College and Hospital, Tamil Nadu, India

Assistant Professor 

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 

References

Bhanker H, Goyal S, Tyagi N, Zaheer S, Mandal AK. Incidentally diagnosed Krukenberg tumor in pregnancy: A rare presentation with dismal outcome. Clin Cancer Investig J. 2016;5:196-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/2278-0513.176242

Co PV. Gastric cancer presenting as a Krukenberg tumor at 22 weeks’ gestation. J Gastric Cancer. 2014;14(4):275-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2014.14.4.275

Dueñas‑García OF, Diaz‑Sotomayor M, Chanana C. Bilateral ovarian Krukenberg tumor in a full‑term pregnancy. ISRN Obstet Gynecol. 2011;1:620380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5402/2011/620380

Kiyokawa T, Young RH, Scully RE. Krukenberg tumors of the ovary: a clinicopathologic analysis of 120 cases with emphasis on their variable pathologic manifestations. Am J Surg Pathol. 2006;30:277-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.pas.0000190787.85024.cb

Papantoniou N, Belitsos P, Hatzipapas I, Rodolakis A, Papaspyrou I, Antsaklis A. Excessive hirsutism in pregnancy because of Krukenberg tumor. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25:869-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2011.592879

Ozdegirmenci O, Kayikcioglu F, Haberal A, Ozfuttu A. Krukenberg tumor mimicking pregnancy luteoma. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2007;23:482-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590701532401

ASGE Standard of Practice Committee, Shergill AK, BenMenachem T, Chandrasekhara V, Chathadi K, Decker GA, et al. Guidelines for endoscopy in pregnant and lactating women. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:18-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2012.02.029

Aziz M, Killeen RB, Kasi A. Krukenberg Tumor. 2022.

Fujimoto D, Hirono Y, Goi T, Yamaguchi A. Sigmoid colonic metastasis by lymphatic spread occurring with unilateral Krukenberg tumor considered to be caused by stage IA early gastric cancer: A case report. Oncol Lett. 2016;11(1):668-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2015.3919

Kammerer WS. Nonobstetric surgery in pregnancy. Med Clin North Am. 1987;71:551-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-7125(16)30858-6

Smith LH, Dalrymple JL, Leiserowitz GS, Danielsen B, Gilbert WM. Obstetrical deliveries associated with maternal malignancy in California, 1992 through 1997. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184:1504-1512 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2001.114867

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin. Management of adnexal masses. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:201-214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000263913.92942.40

Shimizu H, Yamasaki M, Ohama K, Nozaki T, Tanaka Y. Characteristic ultrasonographic appearance of the Krukenberg tumor. J Clin Ultrasound. 1990;18:697-703. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.1990.18.9.697

Sarandakou A, Protonotariou E, Rizos D. Tumor markers in biological fluids associated with pregnancy. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2007;44:151-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10408360601003143

Boltin D, Niv Y. Mucins in gastric cancer – An update. J Gastrointest Dig Syst. 2013;3:15519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-069X.1000123

Downloads

Published

2025-05-29

How to Cite

Thirupathi, K., & Mega Nathan, J. (2025). A precarious outcome of incidentally diagnosed Krukenbergs tumor in antepartum eclampsia case: a rare case report and review of literature. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 14(6), 1999–2002. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20251601

Issue

Section

Case Reports