A novel combined abdominal and vaginal approach for pelvic organ prolapse in young patients

Authors

  • Sonal Bhuyar Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr. PDMMC, Amravati, Maharashtra, India
  • Aditi Katkar Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr. PDMMC, Amravati, Maharashtra, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20251587

Keywords:

Young uterocervical prolapse, Cervical elongation, Cervical amputation, Virkud’s composite sling

Abstract

In India, the incidence of genital prolapse is 1.5 –2 % in nulliparous women and 5–8 % in young multiparous women which is the highest in the world. Though pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is not a life-threatening condition, its impact on life-style and self- esteem of a woman is paramount. There is a gamut of conservative surgical treatment options for POP for patients where the uterus needs to be preserved. Surgical repair in young women is more challenging as anatomical correction and preservation of fertility and sexual functions have to be addressed with a durable solution.  In our case series, all three patients had third degree uterocervical descent with elongated and hypertrophied cervices. Hence neither abdominal nor vaginal repair alone was expected to be sufficient for restoring patient's anatomy and sexual functions. Therefore, we came up with a novel combined abdominal and vaginal approach by carrying out cervical amputation vaginally and Virkud’s composite sling abdominally. The position and healing of the neo cervix was found to be excellent in all three cases during their post operative follow up. Through this case series, we highlight that the best surgical option for the treatment of POP should be tailored according to the patient’s need and expertise of the surgeon, as there are no clear guidelines for the choice of surgery for POP.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Virkud A. Conservative Operations in Genital Prolapse. J Obst Gynaecol India. 2016;66(3):144-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-016-0909-8

Kerkar AV. Fothergill’s operation. J Obst Gynaecol India. 1971;2:748-54.

Virkud A. Modern gynaecology(Ch 18) II ed. New Delhi: APC Publishers; 2015: 210-211.

Barber MD. Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(11):1783-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2169-9

Mouritsen L. Symptoms, bother and POPQ in women referred with pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2003;14(2):122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-002-1024-1

Ryan GA. Conservative management of pelvic organ prolapse: Indian contribution. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2021;71(1):3-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-020-01406-5

Olsen AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;89(4):501-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00058-6

Frieden FJ, Ordorica SA, Hoskins IA, Young BK. The Shirodkar operation: a reappraisal. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;163(3):830-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(90)91078-Q

Purandare VN. New surgical technique for surgical correction of genital prolapses in young women. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 1965;4:53-62.

Vora AV. Pelvic organ prolapse in young women: a topical issue. J South Asian Feder Menopause Soc. 2019;7(2):77-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10032-1189

Downloads

Published

2025-05-29

How to Cite

Bhuyar, S., & Katkar, A. (2025). A novel combined abdominal and vaginal approach for pelvic organ prolapse in young patients. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 14(6), 1946–1950. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20251587

Issue

Section

Case Series