Prenatal invasive diagnostic testing for hemoglobinopathies: a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary care public hospital in central India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20251573Keywords:
Hemoglobinopathy, Antenatal screening, Prenatal invasive testing for hemoglobinopathy, Sickle cell disease, ThalassemiaAbstract
Background: Transfusion-dependent hemoglobinopathies such as sickle cell disease, thalassemia, etc. have a huge impact on the Indian economy due to the need for lifelong care and treatment of associated morbidities. Primary prevention strategies focus on awareness generation and pre-marital and pre-conceptional counseling to prevent the conception of a child with a homozygous genotype. Aim was to study the prevalence of carrier status of hemoglobinopathies, the couples at risk of carrying a fetus with major hemoglobinopathies, and the prevalence of fetal affection with major hemoglobinopathies in prenatal invasive testing.
Methods: It was a retrospective cohort study conducted at AIIMS, Nagpur. Study conducted from 24 months (June 2021-June 2023). All antenatal women screened for hemoglobinopathies with HPLC and diagnosed to have hemoglobinopathies.
Results: The 5,432 antenatal women were screened for hemoglobinopathy using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Out of these, 214 women were carriers of hemoglobinopathies. 53 couples were found to be at risk of carrying a fetus with major hemoglobinopathy. The 52 women underwent prenatal diagnosis (PND), 11 (21.1%) were found to be affected with major hemoglobinopathies and underwent medical termination of pregnancy (MTP). 24 babies were found to be carriers while 17 had no mutation.
Conclusions: Owing to the high prevalence of hemoglobinopathies and the continually increasing impact on global health each year, the benefit of carrier screening programs to control incidence of new cases is recognized worldwide.
Metrics
References
Singh P, Shaikh S, Parmar S, Gupta R. Current Status of β-Thalassemic Burden in India. Hemoglobin. 2023;47(5):181-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03630269.2023.2269837
Farmakis D, Porter J, Taher A, Cappellini MD, Angastiniotis M, Eleftheriou A. 2021 Thalassaemia international federation guidelines for the management of transfusion-dependent thalassemia. Hemasphere. 2022;6(8):e732. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/HS9.0000000000000732
Greer JP, Arber DA, Glader BE, List AF, Means RT, Rodgers GM, et al. Wintrobe's clinical hematology: Fourteenth edition. Wolters Kluwer Health Pharma Solutions (Europe) Ltd. 2018;7072.
Mathew A, Sobti PC. The burden of thalassemia in Punjab: A roadmap forward. Pediatric Hematology Oncology J. 2017;2(4):85-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phoj.2018.01.001
Prevention and control of hemoglobinopathies in India, Thalassemias, Sickle cell disease and other variant hemoglobins. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. 2016.
Yadav SS, Panchal P, Menon KC. Prevalence and Management of β-Thalassemia in India. Hemoglobin. 2022;46(1):27-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03630269.2021.2001346
Singh PJ, Shrivastava A, Shrikhande A. Prenatal diagnosis of sickle cell disease by the technique of PCR. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfusion. 2015;31:233-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12288-014-0427-8
Nagar R, Sinha S, Raman R. Haemoglobinopathies in eastern Indian states: a demographic evaluation. J Community Genet. 2015;6(1):1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-014-0195-z
Colah R, Italia K, Gorakshakar A. Burden of thalassemia in India: The road map for control. Pediatr Hematol Oncol J. 2017;2(4):79-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phoj.2017.10.002
Singh V, Biswas AK, Baranwal AK, Asthana B, Dahiya T. Prevalence of hemoglobinopathies using high-performance liquid chromatography as diagnostic tool in anemic patients of tertiary care center of Western India. Asian J Transfusion Sci. 2024;18(2):257-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ajts.ajts_62_22
Saha S, Ghosh S, Basu K, Bhattacharyya M. Prevalence of β-haemoglobinopathies in Eastern India and development of a novel formula for carrier detection. J Hematopathol. 2020;13(9):159-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12308-020-00407-7
Satam NP, Garg D, Marar T. Prevalence of Sickle Cell: A Study from Tribal Rural Western Maharashtra, India. D Y Patil J Health Sci. 2021;9(1):1-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/dypj.DYPJ_10_20
Hassan MS, Nasrin T, Mahalka A, Mehboob H, Safdar A. A perspective on the genesis, diagnostics, and management of sickle cell disease. Egypt J Med Hum Genet. 2024;25:150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43042-024-00623-1
Colah RB, Mukherjee MB, Martin S, Ghosh K. Sickle cell disease in tribal populations in India. Indian J Med Res. 2015;141(5):509-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-5916.159492
Ghosh S, Chakrabarti S, Bhattacharyya M. Prenatal Screening and Diagnosis of ß-Thalassemia in India: Is ARMS-PCR Enough? Indian J Hematol Blood Transfusion. 2021;37:448-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12288-020-01370-0
Di Mattei V, Ferrari F, Perego G, Tobia V, Mauro F, Candiani M. Decision-making factors in prenatal testing: A systematic review. Health Psychol Open. 2021;8(1):2055102920987455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2055102920987455
Salvesen KÅ, Glad R, Sitras V. Controversies in implementing non-invasive prenatal testing in a public antenatal care program. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022;101:577-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14351
Di Mascio D, Khalil A, Rizzo G, Buca D, Liberati M, Martellucci CA, et al. Risk of fetal loss following amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling in twin pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstetr Gynecol. 2020;56(5):647-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.22143
Ghi T, Sotiriadis A, Calda P, Da Silva Costa F, Raine-Fenning N, Alfirevic Z, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: invasive procedures for prenatal diagnosis in obstetrics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48:256-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.15945
Akolekar R, Beta J, Picciarelli G, Ogilvie C, D’Antonio F. Procedure-related risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45(1):16-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.14636