Does the presence of blood on the catheter or the degree of difficulty in embryo transfer affect the outcome in ART
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20251575Keywords:
ART, Blood on the catheter, Difficult transfer, Degree of difficulty, Embryo transferAbstract
Background: Implantation may be impacted by the embryo transfer (ET) method. It's uncertain whether postprocedural blood at the transfer catheter tip is a true indicator of transfer difficulty because previous studies that examined its impact have produced conflicting findings. Our goal was to calculate the impact of blood at the moment of Embryo Transfer and the degree of difficulty associated with it on live birth rates (LBR).
Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted at Kamlesh Tandon test tube baby centre, Agra from July 2022 to April 2024. Patients underwent COS followed by Oocyte retrieval and fresh embryo transfers. Patients with high Serum Oestradiol levels and more than 15 oocytes were deferred for a fresh embryo transfer. A freeze-all policy was followed by a subsequent freeze thawed embryo transfer cycle. The Clinical Pregnancy Rates and the Live Birth Rates were calculated.
Results: Generalized estimating equations (GEE) for logistics regression with exchangeable correlation with robust variance was used to estimate the adjusted and unadjusted ORs in this retrospective cohort study. After conducting univariate modelling, all relevant confounders were taken into account in the final multivariate (adjusted) GEE model. At the moment of transfer, the ART specialist would subjectively assess embryo transfers as easy, medium or hard. Blood found at ET was linked to more challenging ETs, retained embryos in the catheter and mucus in the catheter. The degree of difficulty for ET had an adverse effect on the live birth rate (LBR), while ET with blood did not correlate with live birth in the univariate study. The only variables linked to an elevated LBR in the final multivariate GEE model, which took into account a patient's repeated cycles, were the blastocyst transfer, female age and the difficulty of the ET. The presence of blood in the transfer catheter was not linked to the chance of pregnancy and, therefore, was not an independent predictor of cycle outcome after correcting for confounding variables. This suggests that the transfer’s inherent complexity and its difficulties are factors that have a substantial negative predictive impact on pregnancy outcomes.
Conclusions: Optimizing ET will allow providers to maximize successful interaction of embryo and endometrium, leading to the establishment of a viable pregnancy. These data suggest that the presence of blood during a routine, easy ET is not detrimental to live birth.
Metrics
References
Mirkin S, Jones EL, Mayer JF, Stadtmauer L, Gibbons WE, Oehninger S. Impact of transabdominal ultrasound guidance on performance and outcome of transcervical uterine embryo transfer. J Assis Reprod Gen. 2003;20:318-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024809607966
Buckett WM. A meta-analysis of ultrasound-guided versus clinical touch embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2003;80(4):1037-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(03)01015-X
Lewin A, Schenker JG, Avrech O, Shapira S, Safran A, Friedler S. The role of uterine straightening by passive bladder distension before embryo transfer in IVF cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet.1997;14(1):32-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765749
Mansour R, Aboulghar M, Serour G. Dummy embryo transfer: a technique that minimizes the problems of embryo transfer and improves the pregnancy rate in human in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1990;54(4):678-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)53829-1
Neithardt AB, Segars JH, Hennessy S, James AN, McKeeby JL. Embryo afterloading: a refinement in embryo transfer technique that may increase clinical pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 2005;83(3):710-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.08.022
Lesny P, Killick SR, Tetlow RL, Robinson J, Maguiness SD. Uterine junctional zone contractions during assisted reproduction cycles. Hum Reprod Update. 1998;4(4):440-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/4.4.440
Jones GM, Trounson AO, Gardner DK, Kausche A, Lolatgis N, Wood C. Evolution of a culture protocol for successful blastocyst development and pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(1):169-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.1.169
Coroleu B, Barri PN, Carreras O, Martínez F, Parriego M, Hereter L, et al. The influence of the depth of embryo replacement into the uterine cavity on implantation rates after IVF: a controlled, ultrasound-guided study. Human reproduction. 2002;17(2):341-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.2.341
Frankfurter D, Trimarchi JB, Silva CP, Keefe DL. Middle to lower uterine segment embryo transfer improves implantation and pregnancy rates compared with fundal embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2004;81(5):1273-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.11.026
Lesny P, Killick SR, Tetlow RL, Manton DJ, Robinson J, Maguiness SD. Ultrasound evaluation of the uterine zonal anatomy during in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(6):1593-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/14.6.1593
Rhodes TL, McCoy TP, Higdon HL 3rd, Boone WR. Factors affecting assisted reproductive technology (ART) pregnancy rates: a multivariate analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2005;22(10):335-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-005-6794-1
Goudas VT, Hammitt DG, Damario MA, Session DR, Singh AP, Dumesic DA. Blood on the embryo transfer catheter is associated with decreased rates of embryo implantation and clinical pregnancy with the use of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 1998;70(5):878-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00315-X
Tiras B, Korucuoglu U, Polat M, Saltik A, Zeyneloglu HB, Yarali H. Effect of blood and mucus on the success rates of embryo transfers. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012;165(2):239-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.07.032
Sallam HN, Sadek SS. Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Fertil Steril. 2003;80(4):1042-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(03)01009-4
Sallam HN, Agameya AF, Rahman AF, Ezzeldin F, Sallam AN. Impact of technical difficulties, choice of catheter and the presence of blood on the success of embryo transfer-experience from a single provider. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2003;20(4):135-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022905618883
Alvero R, Hearns-Stokes RM, Catherino WH, Leondires MP, Segars JH. The presence of blood in the transfer catheter negatively influences outcome at embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(9):1848-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg359
Moragianni VA, Cohen JD, Smith SE. Effect of macroscopic or microscopic blood and mucus on the success rates of embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(2):570-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.11.003
Phillips JA, Martins WP, Nastri CO, Raine-Fenning NJ. Difficult embryo transfers or blood on catheter and assisted reproductive outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;168(2):121-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.12.030
Tur-Kaspa I, Yuval Y, Bider D, Levron J, Shulman A, Dor J. Difficult or repeated sequential embryo transfers do not adversely affect in-vitro fertilization pregnancy rates or outcome. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(9):2452-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.9.2452
Burke LM, Davenport AT, Russell GB, Deaton JL. Predictors of success after embryo transfer: experience from a single provider. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182(5):1001-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2000.105398
Tomas C, Tikkinen K, Tuomivaara L, Tapanainen JS, Martikainen H. The degree of difficulty of embryo transfer is an independent factor for predicting pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(10): 2632-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.10.2632
Lass A, Abusheikha N, Brinsden P, Kovacs GT. The effect of a difficult embryo transfer on the outcome of IVF. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(9):2417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/14.9.2417
Englert Y, Puissant F, Camus M, Van Hoeck J, Leroy F. Clinical study on embryo transfer after human in vitro fertilization. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf. 1986;3(4):243-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01132811
Listijono DR, Boylan T, Cooke S, Kilani S, Chapman MG. An analysis of the impact of embryo transfer difficulty on live birth rates, using a standardised grading system. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2013;16(3):211-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/14647273.2013.804956
Ghaffari F, Kiani K, Bahmanabadi A, Akhoond M. Comparison of easy and difficult embryo transfer outcomes in in vitro fertilization cycles. Int J Fertil Steril. 2013;6(4):232-7.
Kamardi S, Surya IHW, Mahendra INB, Adnyana IP, Suardika A, Tondohusodo N, et al. Impact of body mass index on intracytoplasmic sperm injection in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Zygote. 2021;29:229-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0967199420000830
Richardson A, Brearley S, Ahitan S, Chamberlain S, Davey T, Zujovic L, et al. A clinically useful simplified blastocyst grading system. Reprod Biomed. 2015;31(4):523-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.06.017
De Placido G, Wilding M, Stina I. The effect of ease of transfer and type of catheter used on pregnancy and implantation rates in an IVF program. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2002;19(1):14-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014054421789
Phillips SJ, Dean NL, Buckett WM, Tan SL. Consecutive transfer of day 3 embryos and of day 5–6 blastocysts increase overall pregnancy rates associated with blastocyst culture. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2003;20(11):461-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JARG.0000006708.26464.23
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
