Uterine perforation in a 27-year-old woman, a rare complication of copper intra-uterine device: a case report

Authors

  • Seth Amponsah-Tabi Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Suntreso Government Hospital, Kumasi, Ashanti, Ghana; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8074-0145
  • Martin Y. Kekertsor Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Suntreso Government Hospital, Kumasi, Ashanti, Ghana
  • Helen A. Ofori Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Suntreso Government Hospital, Kumasi, Ashanti, Ghana
  • Cecil Y. A. Bosque-Hamilton Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Suntreso Government Hospital, Kumasi, Ashanti, Ghana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20251589

Keywords:

Copper intra-uterine device, Contraception, Perforation, Uterus

Abstract

Uterine perforation by copper intra-uterine device (IUD) though rare presents as a management challenge to the clinician. A 27-year-old woman of African descent presented with missing strings of a copper IUD that was inserted 2 weeks ago. Ultrasonography (USG) showed device outside the uterus. The initially planned laparoscopic removal at a teaching hospital was unsuccessful due to diagnostic challenges. Copper IUD was successfully removed by laparotomy under USG guidance. Copper IUD is a safe and effective method of contraception. Uterine perforation is a rare complication. Early identification, counselling and prompt removal are necessary to avert further complications.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Martin Y. Kekertsor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Suntreso Government Hospital, Kumasi, Ashanti, Ghana

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Suntreso Government Hospital

Helen A. Ofori, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Suntreso Government Hospital, Kumasi, Ashanti, Ghana

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

References

Iklaki C, Agbakwuru A, Udo AE, Abeshi S. Five-year review of copper T intrauterine device use at the University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Calabar. Open Access J Contracept. 2015;143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJC.S82176

Akintomide H, James A, Moffat M, Barnes P, Rankin J. Systematic review of copper intrauterine contraception continuation in young nulliparous women based on intrauterine device type. BMJ Open. 2022;12(10):1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060606

Bunting JJM, Leung ZCL, Boboc B, Betts DH, Gilroy JB, Oinonen K, et al. Revolutionizing Women’s health: the quest for materials for next-generation, non-hormonal intrauterine devices. NPJ Women’s Heal. 2024;2(1):1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44294-024-00026-y

Kaneshiro B, Aeby T. Long-term safety, efficacy, and patient acceptability of the intrauterine Copper T-380A contraceptive device. Int J Womens Health. 2010;2(1):211-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S6914

Fassett MJ, Reed SD, Rothman KJ, Pisa F, Schoendorf J, Wahdan Y, et al. Risks of Uterine Perforation and Expulsion Associated With Intrauterine Devices. Obstet Gynecol. 2023;142(3):641-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005299

Tabatabaei F, Masoumzadeh M. Dislocated intrauterine devices: clinical presentations, diagnosis and management. Eur J Contracept Reprod Heal Care. 2021;26(2):160-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2021.1874337

Rowlands S, Oloto E, Horwell D. Intrauterine devices and risk of uterine perforation: current perspectives. Open Access J Contracept. 2016;7:19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJC.S85546

Roman JD. Uterine Perforation by Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine Device: A Case Report. Cureus. 2022;14(11):12-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.31398

Tabatabaei F, Hosseini STN, Hakimi P, Vejdani R, Khademi B. Risk factors of uterine perforation when using contraceptive intrauterine devices. BMC Womens Health. 2024;24(1):538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-024-03298-3

Quevedo M. Intrauterine Device Perforation. J Diagnostic Med Sonogr. 2016;32(4):207-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/8756479316645538

Wahba A, Belal D, Fouad R. Perforated Intrauterine Contraceptive Device: Single Institution Experience. Egypt J Fertil Steril. 2023;27(4):10-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/egyfs.2023.317674

Cavallaro FL, Benova L, Owolabi OO, Ali M. A systematic review of the effectiveness of counselling strategies for modern contraceptive methods: what works and what doesn’t? BMJ Sex Reprod Heal. 2020;46(4):254-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsrh-2019-200377

Downloads

Published

2025-05-29

How to Cite

Amponsah-Tabi, S., Kekertsor, M. Y., A. Ofori, H., & Bosque-Hamilton, C. Y. A. (2025). Uterine perforation in a 27-year-old woman, a rare complication of copper intra-uterine device: a case report. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 14(6), 1957–1960. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20251589

Issue

Section

Case Reports