A study of the changes in pelvic floor biometry in pregnancy by trans labial ultrasonography: cross sectional observational analytical study

Authors

  • Mamta Singh Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sparsh Hospital, Kannauj, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Shikha Bharti Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sparsh Hospital, Kannauj, Uttar Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20253073

Keywords:

Female pelvic floore disorders, Pelvic floor biometry, Ultrasonography

Abstract

Background: The pelvic floor, a crucial structure for urinary and anal continence, sexual function, and pelvic organ support, undergoes significant changes during pregnancy and childbirth. Damage to this area can lead to female pelvic floor disorders (FPFDs) such as urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence, and pelvic organ prolapse. This study aimed to evaluate the changes in pelvic floor biometry during pregnancy using translabial ultrasonography (USG) in Indian women.

Methods: This cross-sectional observational analytical study recruited 112 women from December 2022 to July 2023 at Sparsh Hospital. The participants included nulliparous women (n=12) and pregnant women in their second and third trimesters, divided into primigravida (n=50) and second gravida (n=50) groups. Translabial 2D and 4D USG was performed in the study.

Results: The study found statistically significant changes in bladder neck mobility and hiatal area in primigravida patients compared to nulliparous women. Bladder neck mobility increased with parity, especially during the Valsalva maneuver, suggesting a greater descent in multiparous women. The thickness of the levator ani muscle also increased during pregnancy, showing a significant change during contraction in primigravida patients. While hiatal area did not significantly change with increasing parity, bladder neck mobility was notably higher in second gravida patients compared to primigravida patients, particularly during contraction.

Conclusions: Translabial USG is a valuable, non-invasive tool for assessing these changes, which can help clinicians and patients anticipate potential PFDs and implement preventative post-delivery care.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Bordoni B, Sugumar K, Leslie SW. Anatomy, Abdomen and Pelvis, Pelvic Floor. 2023 Jul 17. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 29489277.

Fernandes ACNL, Palacios-Ceña D, Hay-Smith J, Pena CC, Sidou MF, de Alencar AL, et al. Women report sustained benefits from attending group-based education about pelvic floor muscles: a longitudinal qualitative study. J Physiother. 2021;67(3):210-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2021.06.010

Mélanie R, Nathaly G, Marie-Pierre C, Gabriel V, Nathalie JB, Mélanie M. The female pelvic floor fascia anatomy: a systematic search and review. Life. 2021;11(9):900. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/life11090900

Dietz HP, Scoti F, Subramaniam N, Friedman T, Shek KL. Impact of subsequent pregnancies on pelvic floor functional anatomy. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29:1517-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3567-9

Luo D, Chen L, Yu X, Ma L, Chen W, Zhou N, et al. Differences in urinary incontinence symptoms and pelvic floor structure changes during pregnancy between nulliparous and multiparous women. Peer J. 2017;5:3615. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3615

Mallett VT, Bump RC. The epidemiology of female pelvic floor dysfunction. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1994;6:308-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00001703-199408000-00002

Boyle R, Hay-Smith EJ, Cody JD, Morkved S. Pelvic floor muscle training for prevention and treatment of urinary and fecal incontinence in antenatal and postnatal women: a short version Cochrane review. Neurourol Urodyn. 2014;33:269-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22402

Van Geelen H, Ostergard D, Sand P. A review of the impact of pregnancy and childbirth on pelvic floor function as assessed by objective measurement techniques. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29:327-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3540-z

Hilton P, Dolan LM. Pathophysiology of urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. BJOG. 2004;111(1):5-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00458.x

Eickmeyer SM. Anatomy and physiology of the pelvic floor. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2017;28:455-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2017.03.003

Irwin DE, Milsom I, Kopp Z, Abrams P, Cardozo L. Impact of overactive bladder symptoms on employment, social interactions and emotional well-being in six European countries. BJU Int. 2006;97:96-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05889.x

Verbeek M, Hayward L. Pelvic floor dysfunction and its effect on quality of sexual life. Sex Med Rev. 2019;7:559-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sxmr.2019.05.007

Barber MD, Bremer RE, Thor KB, Dolber PC, Kuehl TJ, Coates KW. Innervation of the female levator ani muscles. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:64-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2002.124844

Junginger B, Baessler K, Sapsford R, Hodges PW. Effect of abdominal and pelvic floor tasks on muscle activity, abdominal pressure and bladder neck. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21:69-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0981-z

Sapsford RR, Hodges PW. Contraction of the pelvic floor muscles during abdominal maneuvers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:1081-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2001.24297

Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JO. Functional anatomy of the female pelvic floor. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007;1101:266-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1389.034

Herschorn S. Female pelvic floor anatomy: the pelvic floor, supporting structures, and pelvic organs. Rev Urol. 2004;6(5):2-10.

Handa VL, Roem J, Blomquist JL, Dietz HP, Muñoz A. Pelvic organ prolapse as a function of levator ani avulsion, hiatus size, and strength. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221:1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.03.004

Lu R, Zhang Y, Yu YP. Application of ultrasound in diagnosis of uterine prolapse by measuring area of levator hiatus. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019;99:2315-8.

Panchal S. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. Chapter 3: 3D Ultrasound in Reproductive Medicine. 4th ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Publications; 2014.

Santoro GA, Wieczorek AP, Dietz HP, Mellgren A, Sultan AH, Shobeiri SA, et al. State of the art: an integrated approach to pelvic floor ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37(4):381-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.8816

Youssef A, Montaguti E, Sanlorenzo O, Cariello L, Salsi G, Morganelli G, et al. Reliability of new three-dimensional ultrasound technique for pelvic hiatal area measurement. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47(5):629-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.14933

Downloads

Published

2025-09-26

How to Cite

Singh, M., & Bharti, S. (2025). A study of the changes in pelvic floor biometry in pregnancy by trans labial ultrasonography: cross sectional observational analytical study. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 14(10), 3341–3347. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20253073

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles