Study of primary caesarean section among multiparous women in tertiary care centre of Bastar region: a prospective study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20251974Keywords:
Multigravida, Primary caesarean section, Indication of caesarean sectionAbstract
Background: In this study was to know the incidence of primary Caesarean section in multigravidas, its indications among these patients.
Methods: Prospective observational study. All deliveries at Late Baliram Kashyap Memorial Hospital and Govt Medical college Jagdalpur, Bastar, Chhattisgarh, India. 8729 deliveries during the period of 2 year from January 2022 to December 2023. Multigravida women admitted to hospital with pregnancy of >28 weeks gestation (gravida 2 and above), each of whom has had a previous vaginal delivery of >28 weeks gestation were included. Women with previous abortions and previous section were excluded. Indication of caesarean section, obstetric history, antenatal history.
Results: A total of 8729 deliveries were conducted in the institute Lt shri BRKM Govt Medical College Jagdalpur Chhattisgarh among which 2709 (31%) were caesarean sections and 6015 (68.9%) were conducted vaginally. Total number of primary CS in multiparous women were 642 about 23.6% of the total CS rate. The mean age is 26±4 years ranged from 18 – 40 years. Most of the patients were in the age group of 26-30 years (45.01%) followed by 21-25 years (26.01%) Out of 642 primary cs in multipara, 316 (50.6%) cases underwent emergency CS whereas rest 326 went elective CS. Maternal and fetal indications contributed 21% and 79%.
Conclusions: Many unforeseen complications occur in women who previously had a normal vaginal delivery. With this study we came to the conclusion that fetal distress is the major contributor of primary CS in multigravida. Thus, preventive measures should be taken to decrease the fetal distress and non-progress of labour.
Metrics
References
National Institutes of Health state-of-the-science conference statement. Cesarean delivery on maternal request. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(6):1386-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006250-200606000-00027
Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ, Martin JA, Sulton PD. Preliminary births for 2004: infant and maternal health. Health E-Stats. 2005.
Thomas J, Paranjothy S, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists: Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. The National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report. London: RCOG Press; 2001.
Solomon B. The dangerous multipara. Lancet. 1932;2:8-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)90086-2
Basak S, Lahri D. Dystocia in eutocic multigravida. J Obstet Gynecol India. 1975;25:502-7.
Jain M, Patel A. A cross sectional study of rate, indications and complications of primary caesarean section. Int J Reprod Contracept Obst Gynecol. 2016;5(6):1815. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20161668
National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Cesarean Childbirth. NIH Consensus Statement Online. 1998;3(6):1-3.
Hickl EJ. The safety of caesarean section. In: Popkin DR and Peddle LJ, editors. Women’s Health Today. London: Parthenon Publishers. 1994:65-70.
Vijaykrishnan M and Rao KB. Caesarean deliveries-changing Trends. In: Arulkumaran S, Ratnam SS and Rao KB, editors. The Management of Labour. 2nd ed. Hyderabad: Orient Longman: 2005:351-63.
Danielian PJ, Wang J, Hall MH. Long-term outcome by method of delivery of fetuses in breech presentation at term: population based follow up. BMJ. 1996;312:1451-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7044.1451
Government Statistical Service. NHS Maternity Statistics, England: 1995-96 to 1997-98. London: Government Statistical Service; 2001.
Himabindu P, Tripura SM, Sireesha KV, Sairam MV. Primary Caesarean Section in Multipara. IOSRJDMS. 2015;14(5):22-5.
Ramavath RB, Devi DH. Study of primary caesarean section in multiparous women. MedPulse International Journal of Gynaecology. 2020;14(3):84-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26611/10121434
Rajput N, Singh P, Verma YS. Study of primary caesarean section in multigravida patients. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7:185-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20175843
Boyle A, Reddy UM, Landy HL. Primary cesarean delivery in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(1):33-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182952242
Mohan SS, Thippeveeranna C, Singh LR. Primary caesarean section in multiparous women: a clinical study from tertiary care center in North East India. Indian J Obstet Gynecol Res. 2017;4(4):420-3.
Rao JH, Rampure N. Study of primary caesarean section in multiparous women. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2013;2(24):4414-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds/855
Sree Sailaja P, Kavitha G. Study of primary caesarean section in multigravida. J. Evid. Based Med. Healthc. 2019;6(45):2900-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18410/jebmh/2019/604
Sams S, Cicily TJ, Balachandran A. Institutional Study of Primary Cesarean Section among Multigravida. JMCSR. 2017;5(4):20713-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v5i4.158
Kumar P, Dhaka M, Gaur SS, Pant R, Banerjee KP. Study the assessment of risk factor for primary caesarean section in multigravida. Int J Med Biomed Stud. 2020; 4(1):1-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32553/ijmbs.v4i1.837
Parrish KM, Holt VL, Esterling TR, Connell FA, Logurfo JP. Effect of changes in maternal age, parity and birth weight distribution on primary cesarean delivery rates. JAMA. 1994;271;443-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1994.03510300049037
Mallika M, Suchitra R, Shamshad Begum S. Clinical study of primary caesarean section in multiparous women. J Dent Med Sci. 2020;19(4):20-3.
Nahar K. Indications of Caesarean Section - Study of 100 cases in Mymensingh Medical College Hospital. J Shaheed Suhrawardy Med College. 2009;1(1):6-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/jssmc.v1i1.12167
Gibb DMF, Cardozo LD, Studd JWW, Magos AL, Cooper DJ. Outcome of spontaneous labor in multigravida. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;89:708-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1982.tb05095.x
Singh SM, Singh T, Thakur V. Prospective study of primary cesarean section in multigravida. Parity.;1(404):404.
Neethi Mohan V, Shirisha P, Vaidyanathan G, Muraleedharan VR. Variations in the prevalence of caesarean section deliveries in India between 2016 and 2021–an analysis of Tamil Nadu and Chhattisgarh. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2023;23(1):622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05928-4
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
