Comparison of fetal growth assessment by conventional method and by using intergrowth 21st chart for detecting small for gestation fetuses

Suka Millo; Manju Puri; Anuradha Singh

doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20252323

Authors

Suka Millo Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lady Hardinge Medical College, Delhi, India
Manju Puri Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lady Hardinge Medical College, Delhi, India
Anuradha Singh Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lady Hardinge Medical College, Delhi, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20252323

Keywords:

Fetal growth restriction, Small for gestational age, Symphysio-fundal height, Intergrowth 21st Project, Fundal height

Abstract

Background: Low birthweight is a major contributor to neonatal morbidity and mortality. Conventionally, fetal growth is assessed by clinical palpation of fundal height (FH), which could have significant inter-observer variation. Routine ultrasound, though a reliable tool, is not cost-effective for low-resource settings. Symphysio-FH (SFH) measurement plotted on customized charts is another tool for monitoring fetal growth. The study aims to compare SFH measurement charted on intergrowth 21^st international symphysis FH (SFH) graph charts with FH palpation as a method for detecting small for gestation age (SGA) fetuses.

Methods: This prospective observational analytic study was conducted on 500 pregnant women. SGA was suspected in case of a lag of ≥3 weeks in FH palpation or SFH plotted on intergrowth 21^st charts falling below 10^th centile. Birthweight of new-born was plotted on intergrowth 21^st estimated foetal weight chart. Birthweight below 10^th centile was classified as SGA.

Results: Out of 500 pregnancies, 13.2% new-borns were SGA. SFH measurement showed 99.5% specificity and 83.3% sensitivity compared to 98.6% specificity and 69.9% sensitivity by FH measurement for SGA detection. SFH measurement also had higher true positive (83.3% vs 69.6%), and true negative (97.5% vs 95.5%) value, and missed lesser cases (2.4% vs 4.5%) compared to FH palpation.

Conclusions: The study found SFH plotted on 21^st intergrowth chart to be more sensitive and specific in detecting SGA new-borns compared to conventional FH palpation.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Million Death Study Collaborators. Causes of neonatal and child mortality in India: a nationally representative mortality survey. The Lancet. 2010;376(9755):1853-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61461-4

Balogun OA, Sibai BM, Pedroza C, Blackwell SC, Barrett TL, Chauhan SP. Serial third-trimester ultrasonography compared with routine care in uncomplicated pregnancies: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(6):1358-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002970

Roex A, Nikpoor P, van Eerd E, Hodyl N, Dekker G. Serial plotting on customised fundal height charts results in doubling of the antenatal detection of small for gestational age fetuses in nulliparous women. Aust New Zeal J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;52(1):78-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828X.2011.01408.x

Papageorghiou AT, Ohuma EO, Altman DG, Todros T, Ismail LC, Lambert A, et al. International standards for fetal growth based on serial ultrasound measurements: the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the Intergrowth-21st Project. The Lancet. 2014;384(9946):869-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61490-2

Lee AC, Kozuki N, Cousens S, Stevens GA, Blencowe H, Silveira MF; et al. Estimates of burden and consequences of infants born small for gestational age in low and middle income countries with Intergrowth-21st standard: analysis of CHERG datasets. BMJ. 2017;358:j3677.

Mendez-Figueroa H, Truong VT, Pedroza C, Khan AM, Chauhan SP. Small-for-gestational-age infants among uncomplicated pregnancies at term: a secondary analysis of 9 Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(5):628.e1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.043

Lindqvist PG, Molin J. Does antenatal identification of small-for-gestational age fetuses significantly improve their outcome? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;25(3):258-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.1806

Olusanya BO. Intrauterine growth restriction in a low-income country: Risk factors, adverse perinatal outcomes and correlation with current WHO Multicenter Growth Reference. Early Hum Dev. 2010;86(7):439-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2010.05.023

Subramanian S, Remadevi S, Karthik S. Prevalence, characteristics and maternal risk factors of small for gestational age fetuses in a tertiary care center from Kerala. The New Indian J OBGYN. 2020;7:76-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21276/obgyn.2020.7.15