Non-stress test, amniotic fluid index and color of liquor in term pregnancies in active labour and their association with labour and perinatal outcome
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20252330Keywords:
Aminiotic fluid index, Meconium stained liquor, APGAR score, Cesarean delivery, Fetal distressAbstract
Background: The features of amniotic fluid, such as volume and color, are essential for evaluating fetal health and forecasting postnatal outcomes. Oligohydramnios and meconium-stained amniotic fluid correlate with a heightened risk of unfavorable newborn outcomes, such as diminished APGAR scores, increased NICU hospitalizations and cesarean sections. The non-stress test (NST) is an essential instrument for assessing fetal discomfort during childbirth. This research sought to evaluate the predictive significance of the amniotic fluid index (AFI), wine color and non-stress test (NST) in forecasting newborn outcomes in term pregnancies.
Methods: This comparative prospective cross-sectional research was performed at the Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department of teaching hospitals associated with J.J.M. Medical College, Davangere, from March 2021 to August 2022. A total of 100 term pregnant women in active labor were enrolled. Clinical and ultrasonographic evaluations were conducted to examine Amniotic Fluid Index (AFI), non-stress test (NST) reactivity and liquor properties. Neonatal outcomes, including APGAR scores, birth weight, NICU hospitalizations and delivery method, were documented. Data were evaluated using SPSS v22.0, with statistical significance established at p<0.05.
Results: Maternal age had a significant correlation with meconium-stained liquid (p=0.026), although other maternal factors, including parity, gestational age and BMI, shown no significant variations. The non-reactivity of NST was markedly elevated in the meconium-stained liquor groups (thin: 50%, thick: 33.33%) in contrast to the clear liquor group (16%) (p=0.011). A low amniotic fluid index (AFI) (<8 cm) was more common in the thin meconium-stained liquid group (75%) compared to the clear (54.67%) and thick meconium-stained groups (22.2%). The group with thick meconium staining had markedly lower mean APGAR scores at 1 minute (5.89±0.98) in comparison to the thin (6.47±2.05) and clear liquor groups (6.87±1.21) (p=0.007). NST, AFI and liquor color exhibited significant correlations with cesarean delivery, NICU hospitalization and infant morbidity. The predictive sensitivity of liquor volume, liquor hue and NST for neonatal problems was 77.78%, 80% and 81.82%, respectively.
Conclusions: NST, AFI and amniotic fluid color are significant indicators of fetal well-being in term pregnancies. The occurrence of oligohydramnios, abnormal NST and meconium-stained amniotic fluid markedly elevates the probability of negative outcomes, including as surgical delivery and diminished APGAR scores. These results highlight the need of ongoing intrapartum fetal surveillance and prompt management in high-risk pregnancies.
Metrics
References
Manning FA. Antepartum fetal testing: A critical appraisal. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2009;21(4):348-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0b013e32832ae0b3
Liston R, Sawchuck D, Young D. Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecologists of Canada, British Columbia Perinatal Health Program. Fetal health surveillance: antepartum and intrapartum consensus guideline. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2007;29(4):36-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1701-2163(16)32615-9
Ingermarsson I, Arulkumaran S, Ingermarsson E, Tambyraja RL, Ratnam SS. Admission test: a screening test for fetal distress in labour. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;68:800-6.
Sarno AP, Ahn MO, Phelan JP, Paul RH. Fetal acoustic stimulation in the early intrapartum period as a predictor of subsequent fetal condition. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;162:762-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(90)91004-V
Malcus P, Gudmundsson S, Marsal K, Kwok HH, Vengadasalam D, Ratnam SS. Umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry as a labor admission test. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77:10-6.
Moses J, Doherty DA, Magann EF, Chauhan SP, Morrison JC. A randomized clinical trial of the intrapartum assessment of amniotic fluid volume: amniotic fluid index versus the single deepest pocket technique. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:1564-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.03.046
Nabhan AF, Abdelmoula YA. Amniotic fluid index versus single deepest vertical pocket as a screening test for preventing adverse pregnancy outcome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;3:CD006593. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006593
Phelan JP, Ahn MO, Smith CV, Rutherford SE, Morrison JC. Amniotic fluid index and adverse outcome. J Reprod Med. 1987;32:601-4.
Callen PW. Amniotic fluid volume; its role in fetal health and disease. In ultrasonography in Obstetrics and Gynecol, 5th ed. Philadelphia, Saunders Elsevier. 2008:764. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4160-3264-9.50024-0
Modena AB, Fieni S. Amniotic fluid dynamics. Acta Bio Med Ateneo Parmense. 2004;75(1):11.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Evidence-based Clinical Guideline No. 8, 2001. The use and interpretation of CTG in intrapartum fetal surveillance. RCOG Press; London. Available at: https://ctgutbildning.se. Accessed on 21 August 2025.
Gallo DM, Romero R, Bosco M. Meconium-stained amniotic fluid. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;228(5):1158-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2022.11.1283
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 106: Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation and general management principles. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:1191-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181aef106
Rathod HM, Patel RR, Punatar PS. Maternal and perinatal outcome in oligohydramnios at Guru Gobindsinh hospital, Jamnagar, Gujarat. Int J Health Sci Res. 2014;4(9):91- 6.
Charu jandial, Shashi Gupta, Sudha sharama, Manju Gupta. Perinatal outcome after antepartum diagnosis of oligohydramnios at or beyond 34 weeks of gestation. Int J Health Sci Res. 2007;9(4):213-4.
Kaushik Das. “Pregnancy outcome after diagnosis of Oligohydramnios at term” Dept. of Obstet. & Gynec., Adichunchanagiri Institute of medical sciences, Bellur. 2006
Hoskins IA, Frieden FH, Young BK. “Variable decelerations in reactive non stress tests with decreased amniotic fluid index predict fetal compromise” Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;165:1094-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(91)90478-A
Maiti GD. Clinical efficacy and reliability of amniotic fluid index (AFI) as labour admission test in correlation to perinatal outcome. Int J Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;2(2):89-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33545/gynae.2018.v2.i2b.64
Rutherford, Susan E. The four-quadrant assessment of amniotic fluid volume: an adjunct to antepartum fetal heart rate testing." Obst Gynecol. 1987;70(3):353-6.
Sriya R, Singhai S. Perinatal outcome in patients with amniotic fluid index <=5 cm J Obstet and Gynecol of India. 2001;51(5):98-100.
Guin Gita, Punekar Shweth, Lele Arvind, Khare Shashi. A prospective clinical study of feto-maternal outcome in pregnancies with abnormal liquor volume. J Obst Gyn India. 2011; 61(6):652-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-011-0116-6
Casey BM, MC Intire DD, Donald D. Pregnancy outcome after diagnosis of oligohydramnios at or beyond 34 weeks of gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 182(4):902-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(00)70345-0
Visvalingam G, Purandre N, Cooley S, Roopnarinesingh R, Geary M. Perinatal outcome after ultrasound diagnosis of anhydramnios at term. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012; 32(1):50-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/01443615.2011.618891
Chandra P, Kaur SP, Hans DK, Kapila AK. The impact of amniotic fluid volume assessed intrapartum on perinatal outcome. Obstet and Gynecol Today. 2000;171(2):478-81.
Umber A. Perinatal Outcome in Pregnancies Complicated by Isolated Oligohydramnios at Term. Annals. 2009;15 (1):35-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21649/akemu.v15i1.29
Anand RS, Singh P, Sangal R, Srivastava R, Sharma NR, Tiwari HC. Amniotic fluid index, non-stress test and color of liquor: as a predictor of perinatal outcome. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016;5:3512-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20163433
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
