Optimizing sperm function: examining the correlation between sperm preparation techniques and membrane integrity plus capacitation dynamics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20252337Keywords:
Microfluidics, Sperm preparation, Membrane integrity, Assisted reproductive technologyAbstract
Background: Sperm preparation is a critical step in Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) that significantly impacts sperm quality and fertilization potential. Membrane integrity and capacitation are the most significant parameters to assess sperm function, but methods like Swim-Up (SU) and Density Gradient Centrifugation (DGC) could influence these values by inducing mechanical damage.
Methods: Ninety normozoospermic semen samples were obtained from ART patients and randomly divided into three groups (n=30 per group). Samples were processed by SU, DGC, or Microfluidics (MF) techniques. Initial motility and post-processing membrane integrity were evaluated according to routine protocols, including the Hypo-Osmotic Swelling Test. Statistical analysis was done with one-way ANOVA.
Results: Initial motility was uniformly high across all groups (SU: 99%, DGC and MF: 100%). However, post-processing membrane integrity varied significantly (p<0.0001), with MF showing the highest integrity (86.03±1.98%), followed by SU (78.44±2.70%) and DGC (67.52±3.72%). Microscopic analysis corroborated these findings, indicating superior morphological preservation in the MF group.
Conclusion: Microfluidics significantly outperforms traditional sperm preparation methods in preserving sperm membrane integrity at the cost of no motility compromise. Its adoption into ART protocols can potentially enhance sperm selection and deliver better treatment outcomes for fertility treatment.
Metrics
References
Baro Graf C, Ritagliati C, Torres-Monserrat V, Stival C, Carizza C, Buffone MG, et al. Membrane potential assessment by fluorimetry as a predictor tool of human sperm fertilizing capacity. Front Cell Devel Biol. 2020;7:383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2019.00383
Ruiz-Díaz S, Grande-Pérez S, Arce-López S, Tamargo C, Olegario Hidalgo C, Pérez-Cerezales S. Changes in the cellular distribution of tyrosine phosphorylation and its relationship with the acrosomal exocytosis and plasma membrane integrity during in vitro capacitation of frozen/thawed bull spermatozoa. International J Mol Sci. 2020;21(8):2725. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21082725
Travert C, Carreau S, Galeraud-Denis I. La capacitation in vitro. Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité. 2009;37(6):523-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gyobfe.2009.04.004
Giaccagli MM, Gómez-Elías MD, Herzfeld JD, Marín-Briggiler CI, Cuasnicú PS, Cohen DJ, Da Ros VG. Capacitation-induced mitochondrial activity is required for sperm fertilizing ability in mice by modulating hyperactivation. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology. 2021;9:767161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.767161
Grunewald S, Kriegel C, Baumann T, Glander HJ, Paasch U. Interactions between apoptotic signal transduction and capacitation in human spermatozoa. Human Reproduction. 2009;24(9):2071-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dep178
Ho HC, Suarez SS. Hyperactivation of mammalian spermatozoa: function and regulation. Reproduction-Cambridge. 2001;122(4):519-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/rep.0.1220519
Samuel R, Feng H, Jafek A, Despain D, Jenkins T, Gale B. Microfluidic—based sperm sorting & analysis for treatment of male infertility. Translational Androl Urol. 2018;7(3):336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2018.05.08
Wang L, Chen W, Zhao C, Huo R, Guo XJ, Lin M, Huang XY, Mao YD, Zhou ZM, Sha JH. The role of ezrin-associated protein network in human sperm capacitation. Asian J Androl. 2010;12(5):667. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/aja.2010.79
Bahmid NA, Jamil NI, Yusuf OD, Farida S, Gustina S. Plasma membrane integrity and acrosomal integrity of fresh and frozen Bali bull semen based on different ejaculate volume. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Scien. 2023;1174(1):12034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1174/1/012034
Naumenkova VA, Atroshchenko MM, Gulov AN, Shirokova OV, Frolova NA. Comparative Evaluation of Different Methods for Assessing Stallion Sperm Membrane Integrity. Russian Agricul Sci. 2020;46:381-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068367420040126
Wysokińska A, Szablicka D. Integrity of sperm cell membrane in the semen of crossbred and purebred boars during storage at 17°C: heterosis effects. Animals. 2021;11(12):3373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11123373
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
