Effect of borderline amniotic fluid index in last trimester on perinatal outcome in eastern India: a prospective observational study

Meeta Sharma; Shagun Gupta; Aarti Kothari

doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20252725

Authors

Meeta Sharma Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mahatma Gandhi University of Medical Sciences and Technology Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
Shagun Gupta Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mahatma Gandhi University of Medical Sciences and Technology Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
Aarti Kothari Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, JIET Medical College and Hospital, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20252725

Keywords:

Amniotic fluid index, Borderline amniotic fluid index, Fetal distress, Perinatal outcome

Abstract

Background: This study was done to evaluate the impact of borderline amniotic fluid index (AFI) on perinatal outcomes in term pregnancies.

Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted between January and June 2024. A total of 120 pregnant women at term (37-40 weeks) were divided into two groups: group A (n=60) with normal AFI (8-24 cm) and group B (n=60) with borderline AFI (5-8 cm). Participants were followed until delivery and up to 7 days postpartum with assessment of maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Results: Baseline maternal characteristics were comparable between groups. The borderline AFI group had significantly higher rates of fetal distress requiring caesarean delivery (30.0% versus 13.3%, p=0.026), meconium-stained amniotic fluid (36.7% versus 16.7%, p=0.013), and NICU admissions (23.3% versus 10.0%, p=0.048). Neonates in the borderline AFI group had lower birth weights (3042±384g versus 3186±352g, p=0.034), lower umbilical cord pH (7.24±0.08 versus 7.28±0.07, p=0.004), and more early neonatal complications (18.3% versus 6.7%, p=0.045). Subgroup analysis revealed poorer outcomes in pregnancies with AFI 5-6.5 cm compared to AFI 6.6-8 cm.

Conclusions: Borderline AFI at term is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes and should be considered a risk factor requiring closer antenatal monitoring and modified intrapartum management. The risk appears to increase with decreasing AFI values, even within the borderline range.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Jamal A, Kazemi M, Marsoosi V, Eslamian L. Adverse perinatal outcomes in borderline amniotic fluid index. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2016;14(11):705-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29252/ijrm.14.11.705

Mulvihill SJ, Stone MM, Debas HT, Fonkalsrud EW. The role of amniotic fluid in fetal nutrition. J Pediatr Surg. 1985;20(6):668-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3468(85)80021-X

Nabhan AF, Abdelmoula YA. Amniotic fluid index versus single deepest vertical pocket as a screening test for preventing adverse pregnancy outcome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;2008(3):CD006593. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006593

Asgharnia M, Faraji R, Salamat F, Ashrafkhani B, Dalil Heirati SF, Naimian S. Perinatal outcomes of pregnancies with borderline versus normal amniotic fluid index. Iran J Reprod Med. 2013;11(9):705-10.

Bhangale S, Kose V. Obstetric outcome of pregnancies with borderline versus normal amniotic fluid index at term: an analytical cross sectional study. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2022;11(6):1734-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20221449

Baron C, Morgan MA, Garite TJ. The impact of amniotic fluid volume assessed intrapartum on perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;173(1):167-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(95)90185-X

Gumus II, Koktener A, Turhan NO. Perinatal outcomes of pregnancies with borderline amniotic fluid index. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2007;276(1):17-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-006-0309-x

Magann EF, Chauhan SP, Hitt WC, Dubil EA, Morrison JC. Borderline or marginal amniotic fluid index and peripartum outcomes: a review of the literature. J Ultrasound Med. 2011;30(4):523-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2011.30.4.523

Choi SR. Borderline amniotic fluid index and perinatal outcomes in the uncomplicated term pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(3):457-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2015.1004051

Roshni S, Gayathri. Maternal and perinatal outcomes, and associated factors in isolated borderline oligohydramnios: a cross-sectional analytical study. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2023;12(12):3626-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20233646

Chauhan SP, Sanderson M, Hendrix NW, Magann EF, Devoe LD. Perinatal outcome and amniotic fluid index in the antepartum and intrapartum periods: a meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181(6):1473-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70393-5

Prasad DR, Nair NV. Study of perinatal outcomes in normal and borderline oligamnios. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2019;9(1):279-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20196034

Asgharnia M, Faraji R, Salamat F, Ashrafkhani B, Dalil Heirati SF, Naimian S. Perinatal outcomes of pregnancies with borderline versus normal amniotic fluid index. Iran J Reprod Med. 2013;11(9):705-10.

Ali HS. Assessment of amniotic fluid index in normal pregnancy at a tertiary care hospital setting. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2009;21:149-51.

Kwon JY, Kwon HS, Kim YH, Park YW. Abnormal Doppler velocimetry is related to adverse perinatal outcome for borderline amniotic fluid index during third trimester. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2006;32(6):545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0756.2006.00459.x