Fetomaternal outcomes in term pregnancies with artificial versus spontaneous rupture of membranes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20252731Keywords:
Artificial rupture of membranes, Amniotomy, Fetomaternal outcomes, Labor duration, Obstetrics, Spontaneous rupture of membranesAbstract
Background: Artificial rupture of membranes (ARM) is a commonly used intervention in active labor management. Although effective in accelerating labor, its impact on maternal and fetal outcomes remains debated. This study was conducted to compare the feto-maternal outcomes associated with ARM versus spontaneous rupture of membranes (SRM).
Methods: This prospective comparative study was conducted on 160 term pregnant women admitted in labor, divided equally into two groups: Group I underwent ARM, and Group II progressed with SRM. Primary outcomes studied included labor duration, mode of delivery, maternal complications (such as postpartum hemorrhage and fever), and fetal outcomes (Apgar score, NICU admission, meconium-stained liquor.
Results: The mean duration of labor was significantly shorter in the ARM group (5.63±1.63 hours) compared to the SRM group (6.83±1.27 hours) (p<0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference in cesarean delivery rate, Apgar scores, NICU admissions, or maternal complications between the two groups.
Conclusions: Artificial rupture of membranes is a safe and effective method to reduce the duration of labor without increasing maternal or neonatal complications. When performed under aseptic conditions, it can be used reliably in active labor management.
Metrics
References
Hutchison J, Mahdy H, Jenkins SM, Hutchison J. Normal Labor: Physiology, Evaluation, and Management. [Updated 2025 Feb 15]. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025.
Thornton JM, Browne B, Ramphul M. Mechanisms and management of normal labour. Obstetr Gynaecol Reproduct Medi. 2020;30(3):84-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogrm.2019.12.002
Mahdy H, Eruo FU. Amniotomy. [Updated 2023 Apr 10]. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-.
Rattanakanokchai S, Gallos ID, Kietpeerakool C, Eamudomkarn N, Alfirevic Z, Oladapo OT, et al. Methods of induction of labour: a network meta‐analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023;2023(1):15234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD015234
Samiyappa DP, Ghose S, John LB, Samal R. Maternal and perinatal outcome in meconium stained amniotic fluid at term: a case control study. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016;5(10):3404-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20163413
Upawi SN, Ahmad MF, Abu MA, Ahmad S. Amniotomy and early oxytocin infusion vs amniotomy and delayed oxytocin infusion for labour augmentation amongst nulliparous women at term: A randomised controlled trial. Midwifery. 2022;105:103238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2021.103238
Fowler JR, Simon LV. Chorioamnionitis. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-.
Shafqat T, Zeb L, Yasmin S. Comparing effects of amniotomy and spontaneous rupture of membrane on duration of labor in primigravida at term pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Res. 2022;5:181-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26502/ogr090
Chauhan A, Sarkar B, Tanwar K. Comparative evaluation of artificial rupture of membranes and spontaneous rupture of membranes on course of labour and feto-maternal outcomes. Int J Reproduct Contracep Obstetr Gynecol. 2020;9(10):4160-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20204306
Smyth RM, Markham C, Dowswell T. Amniotomy for shortening spontaneous labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013(6):6167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006167.pub4
World Health Organization. WHO recommendations: Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience Evidence and recommendations, 2018. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK513805/. Accessed on 01 June 2025.
Halouani A, Masmoudi Y, Hamdaoui R, Hammami A, Triki A, Ben Amor A. Early versus late amniotomy during induction of labor using oxytocin: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2023;18(5):286037. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286037
Lemos A, Amorim MM, Dornelas de Andrade A, de Souza AI, Cabral Filho JE, Correia JB. Pushing/bearing down methods for the second stage of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;3(3):9124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009124.pub3
Umana OD, Vadakekut ES, Siccardi MA. Antenatal Fetal Surveillance. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
