To study the role of hysteroscopy and laparoscopy in the evaluation of infertility

Authors

  • Kimaya Mali Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Seth G.S. Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • Swadhin Mohanty Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Central Railway Hospital, Byculla (East), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20162978

Keywords:

Infertility, Hysteroscopy, Laparoscopy

Abstract

Background: Infertility is defined as a lack of conception after at least 12 months of unprotected intercourse. Hysteroscopy and laparoscopy are the two methods widely used in assessing tubal patency, endometriosis, for diagnosis and treatment of polycystic ovaries, tub ovarian mass, peritubal adhesions. This study strives to undertake an in depth analysis of infertility with the help of hysteroscopy and laparoscopy to give a lucid picture to establish a diagnosis and subsequent treatment for the same.

Methods: This is a prospective study carried out in department of obstetrics and gynaecology at Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Central Railway Hospital, Mumbai in the year 2008. Women within the age of 20 to 40 with infertility were included in the study.

Results: There were 50 patients in the study out of which 35cases were of primary infertility and 15 cases of secondary infertility. Most common age group was between 26 to 30 years in 42% cases. Hysteroscopy could detect abnormality in 12 cases (24%) and the most common finding being fibroid. Laparoscopy could detect pathology in 74% of cases and the commonest pathology being PCOS (28%).

Conclusions: Hysterolaparoscopy is a very good diagnostic tool for identification of certain problems like endometriosis, adhesions near adnexa etc. which are difficult to diagnose by other imaging modalities and even it can be used as the operative tool in certain situations while undergoing diagnostic test.

References

Boivin J, Bunting L, Collins JA, Nygren KG. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:1506-12.

WHO laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interaction. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. World Health Organization; 1999.

Miller JH, Weinberg RK, Canino NL, Klein NA, Soules MR. The pattern of infertility diagnoses in women of advanced reproductive age. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181:952-7.

Mol BW, Collins JA, Burrows EA, van der Veen F, Bossuyt PM. Comparison of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in predicting fertility outcome. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:1237-42.

Jayakrishnan K, Koshy AK, Raju R. Role of laparohysteroscopy in women with normal pelvic imaging and failed ovulation stimulation with intrauterine insemination. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2010;3:20-4.

Godinjak Z, Idrizbegovic E. Should diagnostic hysteroscopy is a routine procedure during diagnostic laparoscopy in infertile women. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2008;8:44-7.

Tsuji I, Ami K, Miyazaki A, Hujinami N, Hoshiai H. Benefit of diagnostic laparoscopy for patients with unexplained infertility and normal hysterosalpingography findings. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2009;219:39-42.

Wallach EE. The uterine factor in infertility. Fertil Steril. 1972;23:138-58.

Brown SE, Coddington CC, Schnorr J, Toner JP, Gibbons W, Oehninger S. Evaluation of outpatient hysteroscopy, saline infusion hysterosonography, and hysterosalpingography in infertile women: A prospective, randomized study. Fertil Steril. 2000;74:1029-34.

Romano F, Cicinelli E, Anastasio PS, Epifani S, Fanelli F, Galantino P. Sonohysterography versus hysteroscopy for diagnosing endouterine abnormalities in fertile women. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1994;45:253-60.

Mooney SB, Milki AA. Effect of hysteroscopy performed in the cycle preceding controlled ovarian hyperstimulation on the outcome of in vitro fertilisation. Fertil Steril. 2003;79:637-8.

Homer HA, Li TC, Cooke ID. The septate uterus: a review of management and reproductive outcome. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:1-14.

Grimbizis GF, Camus M, Tarlatzis BC, Bontis JN, Devroey P. Clinical implications of uterine malformations and hysteroscopic treatment results. Hum Reprod Update. 2001;7:161-74.

Kamiński P, Wieczorek K, Marianowski L. Usefulness of hysteroscopy in diagnosing sterility. Ginekol Pol. 1992;63:634-7.

Donnez J, Jadoul P. What are the implications of myomas on fertility? A need for a debate? Hum Reprod. 2002;17:1424-30.

Pritts EA. Fibroids and infertility: a systematic review of the evidence. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2001;56:483-91.

Vollenhoven BJ, Lawrence AS, Healy DL. Uterine fibroids: a clinical review. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990;97:285-98.

Hinckley MD, Milki AA. 1000 office-based hysteroscopies prior to in vitro fertilization: Feasibility and findings. JSLS. 2004;8:103-7.

Shalev J, Meizner I, Bar-Hava I, Dicker D, Mashiach R, Ben-Rafael Z. Predictive value of trans-vaginal sonography performed before routine diagnostic hysteroscopy for evaluation of infertility. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:412-7.

Shokeir TA, Shalan HM, EI-Shafei MM. Significance of endometrial polyps detected hysteroscopically in eumenorrheic infertile women. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2004;30:84-9.

Downloads

Published

2017-02-03

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles