Unmasking the hidden dangers in caesarean scar pregnancy: a case series
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20252346Keywords:
Caesarean scar, Ectopic pregnancy, Suction evacuation, β-HCGAbstract
Caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a rare form of ectopic pregnancy with increasing incidence due to rising caesarean section rates. This case series aims to describe the clinical presentation, diagnostic approach, management, and outcomes of patients with caesarean scar pregnancies managed at our institution. This retrospective case series included eight patients diagnosed with caesarean scar pregnancy at Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research over a two-year period (January 2023–January 2025). Diagnosis was based on established ultrasonographic criteria. Clinical presentation, management strategies, and outcomes were analyzed. All patients had a history of prior caesarean deliveries. The majority presented with vaginal bleeding in early pregnancy, while one patient was diagnosed incidentally. Transvaginal ultrasound confirmed caesarean scar implantation in all cases. Management included systemic and intrasac methotrexate administration, ultrasound-guided suction evacuation, and uterine artery embolization in selected cases. Serial β-hCG monitoring guided treatment response. Fertility-preserving conservative management was successful in all patients without major complications. Early diagnosis and individualized conservative management can result in favourable outcomes in caesarean scar pregnancy. Increased awareness, early imaging, and careful monitoring are critical to prevent life-threatening complications and preserve reproductive potential. Further studies are needed to establish standardized treatment guidelines.
Metrics
References
ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins. Tubal ectopic pregnancy: ACOG practice bulletin. Clin Manag Guidel Obs Gynecol. 2018;131:e91-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002560
Fylstra DL. Ectopic pregnancy not within the (distal) fallopian tube: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206:289-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2011.10.857
Rosen T. Placenta accreta and cesarean scar pregnancy: overlooked costs of the rising cesarean section rate. Clin Perinatol. 2008;35:519-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clp.2008.07.003
Rotas MA, Haberman S, Levgur M. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies etiology. Am Coll Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107:1373-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000218690.24494.ce
Patel MA. Scar ectopic pregnancy. J Med Biol Eng. 2015;65:372-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-015-0817-3
Ash A, Smith A, Maxwell D. Caesarean scar pregnancy. BJOG. 2007;114:253-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01237.x
Cömert EH, Şal H, Ekici YS, Seda E, Guven G. Cesarean scar pregnancy: a case report. Turk Klin Jinekoloji Obstet. 2018;26:37-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5336/caserep.2016-53978
Hoffman T, Lin J. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: diagnosis with ultrasound. Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med. 2020;4:65-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5811/cpcem.2019.10.43988
Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Cali G, El Refaey H, Kaelin Agten A, Arslan AA. Easy sonographic differential diagnosis between intrauterine pregnancy and cesarean delivery scar pregnancy in the early first trimester. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(2):225.e1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.02.028
Riaz RM, Williams TR, Craig BM, Myers DT. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: imaging features, current treatment options, and clinical outcomes. Abdom Imaging. 2015;40:2589-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0472-2
Wang CJ, Yuen LT, Chao AS, Lee CL, Yen CF, Soong YK. Caesarean scar pregnancy successfully treated by operative hysteroscopy and suction curettage. BJOG. 2005;112:839-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00532.x
Jurkovic D, Hillaby K, Woelfer B, Lawrence A, Salim R, Elson CJ. First-trimester diagnosis and management of pregnancies implanted into the lower uterine cesarean section scar. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21:220-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.56
Zalduegui MM, Ferreiro SI, Vélez AR, Monje Beltrán ML, Vicedo Madrazo EM, Martínez Portillo RJ, et al. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy, a life threatening condition: a case report. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2019;46:313-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12891/ceog4466.2019
Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990–2014. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0148343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148343
Jayaram PM, Okunoye GO, Konje J. Caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: diagnostic challenges and management options. Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;19(1):13-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/tog.12355
Seow KM, Hwang JL, Tsai YL, Huang LW, Lin YH, Hsieh BC. Subsequent pregnancy outcome after conservative treatment of a previous Caesarean scar pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004;83(12):1167-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0001-6349.2004.00445.x
Maheux-Lacroix S, Li F, Bujold E, Nesbitt-Hawes E, Deans R, Abbott J. Cesarean scar pregnancies: a systematic review of treatment options. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017;24(6):915-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2017.05.019
Stabile G, Vona L, Carlucci S, Zullo F, Laganà AS, Etrusco A, et al. Conservative treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy with the combination of methotrexate and mifepristone: A systematic review. Womens Health (Lond). 2024;20:17455057241290424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17455057241290424
Cao S, Zhu L, Jin L, Gao J, Chen C. Uterine artery embolization in cesarean scar pregnancy: safe and effective intervention. Chin Med J. 2014;127(12):2322-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.20140196
Morente LS, León AIG, Reina MPE, Herrero JRA, Mesa EG, López JSJ. Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy-Case Series: treatment Decision Algorithm and Success with Medical Treatment. Medicina. 2021;57(4):362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57040362
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
