A rare case of vaginal vault prolapses after vaginal hysterectomy in North India: managed via sacrocolpopexy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20253119Keywords:
Case report, Post-hysterectomy, Sacrocolpopexy, Vault prolapseAbstract
Vaginal vault prolapse refers to the descent of the upper portion of the vagina (apex or dome) into the vaginal canal or beyond the vaginal introitus, typically following a hysterectomy. This condition is a rare but significant long-term complication, with an incidence ranging from 0.1% to 18.2% after vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy. It may present in isolation or in conjunction with other pelvic organ prolapse disorders, such as cystocele, rectocele, or enterocele. Risk factors include advancing age, multiparity, chronic increased intra-abdominal pressure, and poor pelvic support following surgery. Sacral colpopexy especially via the abdominal approach remains the gold-standard surgical treatment due to its superior anatomical and functional outcomes and lower recurrence rates when compared to vaginal repairs. The procedure involves attachment of the vaginal apex to the sacral promontory using a synthetic mesh, restoring normal vaginal axis and support. Despite its clinical relevance, vaginal vault prolapse with a large enterocele remains underreported in certain regions, particularly in North India. A lack of awareness and underdiagnosis often delay appropriate management, especially in rural populations. We present a case of a 63-year-old woman with a history of vaginal hysterectomy 13 years prior, who presented to our tertiary care center with a symptomatic vaginal vault prolapse associated with a large enterocele. She was successfully managed by open abdominal sacral colpopexy and discharged in stable condition.
Metrics
References
Uzoma A, Farag KA. Vaginal vault prolapse. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2009;2009:275621. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/275621
Marinkovic SP, Gillin LM, Marinkovic CM. Sacrocolpopexy for post hysterectomy vault prolapse. Hysterectomy. IntechOpen. 2012. Available at: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/35362. Accessed on 12 May 2025.
Aboseif C, Liu P. Pelvic organ prolapse. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. 2022.
Cheung WW, Khargi R, Karjane NW, Strohbehn K, Marks BK. Sacrocolpopexy. Medscape. 2024. Available at: https://emedicine.medscape.com/ article/2048426-overview. Accessed on 12 May 2025.
Romano F, Sartore A, Mordeglia D, Di Lorenzo G, Stabile G, Ricci G. Laparoscopic monolateral suspension for vaginal vault prolapse: a report of an exit surgical strategy during sacralcolpopexy. BMC Surg. 2020;20:199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-020-00861-1
Mohapatra I, Samantaray SR. Sacrocolpopexy for post hysterectomy vault prolapse: A single centre experience in south India. Int J Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2021;5(3):205-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33545/gynae.2021.v5.i3d.925
Ferronha F, Riquelme JB, Martins FE. Open abdominal sacrocolpopexy. In: Martins FE, Holm HV, Sandhu JS, McCammon KA, editors. Female Genitourinary and Pelvic Floor Reconstruction. Cham: Springer. 2023;37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19598-3_37
Illiano E, Giannitsas K, Zucchi A, Di Biase M, Del Zingaro M, Bini V, et al. Sacrocolpopexy for posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: long-term follow-up. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(10):1563-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-2998-4
Gentile M, Catapano P, Costanza A, Zinna M. Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for Treatment of Vaginal Vault Prolapse in a Patient with Severe Pelvic Adhesions: A Case Report. Int J Res Rep Gynaecol. 2020;3(1):25-31.
Yadav M, Hayashi T, Krisna R, Nutthachote P, Sawada Y, Tokiwa S, et al. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in a patient with vault prolapse of the sigmoid stump after vaginoplasty in Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome: a case report. Case Rep Womens Health. 2021;30:e00313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crwh.2021.e00313
Coolen AWM, Bui BN, Dietz V, Wang R, van Montfoort APA, Mol BWJ, et al. The treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(12):1767-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3493-2