Comparative evaluation of maternal and neonatal outcomes using the WHO labour care guide versus the WHO-modified partograph: a prospective observational study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20253082Keywords:
WHO-Modified Partograph, WHO Labour Care Guide, Neonatal outcomes, Maternal outcomes, Labour monitoringAbstract
Background: Labour and childbirth remain critical phases in maternal care, with significant implications for maternal and neonatal outcomes. Despite declining global mortality rates, disparities persist, particularly in low-resource settings. Effective labour monitoring tools are essential for improving outcomes and reducing complications. This study aimed to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes using the WHO Labour Care Guide (LCG) versus the WHO-Modified Partograph (WHO-MP) for intrapartum monitoring.
Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted at GS Medical College & Hospital over 15-18 months. A total of 200 full-term pregnant women in active labour (≥4 cm cervical dilation) were randomly assigned to either the WHO-LCG group (n=100) or the WHO-MP group (n=100). Inclusion criteria encompassed singleton pregnancies with vertex presentation and no medical or obstetric complications. Labour progression, delivery mode, maternal complications, and neonatal outcomes were recorded and analysed using SPSS v27.
Results: Normal vaginal deliveries were higher in the LCG group (86%) compared to WHO-MP (78%), with lower maternal infection rates (6% vs. 18%, p=0.005) and postpartum hemorrhage (1% vs. 6%). The LCG group showed significantly shorter labour durations and NICU stays. Apgar scores and NICU admission rates were comparable, though early neonatal recovery was more favorable in the LCG group.
Conclusions: The WHO Labour Care Guide provides a structured, patient-centered approach to labour monitoring, potentially enhancing maternal and neonatal outcomes through timely and individualized care.
Metrics
References
Orji EO, Olabode TO. Comparative study of labour progress and delivery outcome among induced versus spontaneous labour in nulliparous women using modified WHO partograph. Nepal J Obstetr Gynaecol. 2008;3(1):24-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/njog.v3i1.1435
Yisma E, Dessalegn B, Astatkie A, Fesseha N. Completion of the modified World Health Organization (WHO) partograph during labour in public health institutions of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Reprod Heal. 2013;10(1):23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-10-23
Bhatt MJ, Kadikar GK, Kanani M, Shah S. Comparison of normal and abnormal labour by using Modified WHO Partograph. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7(4):1440. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20181332
Ahmed B, Jain M, Bharwani H. Partograph versus no partograph: effect on labour progress and delivery outcome: a comparative study. Int J Reprod Contrac Obstetr Gynecol. 2017;6(11):4928-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20175002
Pingray V, Bonet M, Berrueta M, Mazzoni A, Belizán M, Keil N, et al. The development of the WHO Labour Care Guide: an international survey of maternity care providers. Reprod Health. 2021;18(1):1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01074-2
Pandey D, Bharti R, Dabral A, Khanam Z. Impact of WHO Labor Care Guide on reducing cesarean sections at a tertiary center: an open-label randomized controlled trial. AJOG Global Reports 2022;2(3):100075. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100075
Mugyenyi GR, Tumuhimbise W, Atukunda EC, Tibaijuka L, Ngonzi J, Kayondo M, et al. Effectiveness of the Modified WHO Labour Care Guide to Detect Prolonged and Obstructed Labour Among Women Admitted at Eight Publicly Funded, Midwife-Led Community Health Facilities in Rural Mbarara District, Southwestern Uganda: An Ambispective Cohort Study. Inter J Women's Heal. 2025:271-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S498903
Jogi SR, Singh D, Kanwar R. A Comparative Open Label Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Feto – Maternal Outcome in Spontaneous Labour Between Who Labour Care Guide VS Who Modified Partograph. CME J Geriatr Medi. 2025;17:68-76.
Nivedita D, Anjum M. Evaluation of primigravida in labour using modified WHO partograph: comparative study of 100 cases. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7(2):470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20180157
Lavender T, Alfirevic Z, Walkinshaw S. Effect of different partogram action lines on birth outcomes: a randomized controlled trial. Obstetr Gynecol. 2006;108(2):295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000226862.78768.5c
Hofmeyr GJ, Bernitz S, Bonet M, Bucagu M, Dao B, Downe S, et al. WHO next‐generation partograph: revolutionary steps towards individualised labour care. BJOG 2021;128(10):1658-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16694
Ghulaxe Y, Tayade S, Huse S, Chavada J. Advancement in Partograph: WHO’s Labor Care Guide. Cureus. 2022;14(10). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.30238
Patabendige M, Wickramasooriya DJ, Dasanayake DLW. WHO Labor Care Guide as the next generation partogram: Revolutionising the quality of care during labor. Eur J Midwifery. 2021;5:26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/138597
Lee NJ, Neal J, Lowe NK, Kildea SV. Comparing different partograph designs for use in standard labor care: a pilot randomized trial. Matern Child Health J. 2018;22(3):355-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-017-2366-0
Godfrey MR, Wilson T, Esther AC, Leevan T, Joseph N, Musa K, et al. Effectiveness of the modified WHO labour care guide to detect prolonged and obstructed labour among women admitted at publicly funded facilities in rural Mbarara district, Southwestern Uganda: an ambispective cohort study. medRxiv 2024;2024.09.04.2431307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.04.24313073
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
