Effect of the umbilical cord length on mode of delivery and perinatal outcome

Syeda Mahin Saidani; Gowramba Sajjan; Mohammed Abdul Azeem

doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20253086

Authors

Syeda Mahin Saidani Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Al-Ameen medical college and Hospital, Vijayapur, Karnataka, India
Gowramba Sajjan Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Al-Ameen medical college and Hospital, Vijayapur, Karnataka, India
Mohammed Abdul Azeem Department of Pediatrics, KBNU, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kalaburagi, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20253086

Keywords:

Umbilical cord length, Labor duration, Foetal distress, APGAR score, NICU admission, Nuchal cord, Mode of delivery

Abstract

Background: The umbilical cord is a vital anatomical structure connecting the fetus to the placenta, and its length along with the presence of nuchal loops may influence labor progression and neonatal outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between umbilical cord length and mode of delivery, duration of labor, neonatal APGAR scores, NICU admissions, and incidence of fetal distress.

Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted at Al-Ameen medical college hospital from July 2023 to January 2025, involving 200 pregnant women. Umbilical cord length and the presence and number of nuchal loops were documented at delivery. Maternal and neonatal outcomes, including mode of delivery, labor duration, fetal distress, and neonatal parameters, were recorded and analysed statistically.

Results: The mean umbilical cord length was 50.68±11.75 cm. Although the incidence of caesarean delivery was higher in both short and long cord groups, the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.217). Labor duration was significantly prolonged in cases with nuchal cord, particularly among primigravida (17.62±1.38 h vs. 11.95±1.49 h). Neonates with nuchal loops had lower APGAR scores at 1 and 5 minutes (p=0.003), and NICU admission rates were higher among those with multiple loops (p<0.001). Fetal distress increased significantly with number of nuchal loops (p<0.0001).

Conclusions: Abnormal cord length and multiple nuchal loops are significantly associated with prolonged labor, fetal distress, increased incidence of instrumental delivery, caesarean section due to cephalopelvic disproportion due to deflexed head, low APGAR score, NICU admission. Patients with 2-3 loop of cord around the neck can have normal vaginal delivery. There is increasing rate of caesarean section due to ultrasound diagnosis of cord around the neck at term, because of obstetrician distress and patients request rather than obstetric indication.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Yadav BB, Kurdukar DV, Darade RV, Mahadar NA. Correlation of umbilical cord length with foetal and maternal outcome. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2013;2(4):412-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds/280

Sarwono E, Disse WS, Oudesluys Murphy HM, Oosting H, De Groot CJ. Umbilical cord length and intra uterine wellbeing. Paediatr Indones. 1991;31(5-6):136-40.

Weiner E, Bar J, Fainstein N, Schreiber L, Ben-Haroush A, Kovo M. Intraoperative findings, placental assessment and neonatal outcome in emergent cesarean deliveries for non-reassuring fetal heart rate. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;185:103-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.12.007

Adinma JI. The umbilical cord: a study of 1,000 consecutive deliveries. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud 1993;38(3):175-9.

Mishra R, Vijayalaxmi P, Nirmala Kumari J. Correlation of the length of umbilical cord of the fetus with outcome of labor. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 1987;37:781.

Strong TH, Jarles DL, Vega JS, Feldman DB. The umbilical coiling index. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170(1pt1):29-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(94)70378-7

Yamamoto Y, Aoki S, Oba MS, Seki K, Hirahara F. Short umbilical cord length: reflective of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2017;44(2):216-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12891/ceog3338.2017

Sharma S, Soliriya V. Study of Length of Umbilical Cord at Term and Its Correlation with Fetal Outcome: A Study of 500 Deliveries. J South Asian Fed Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;8(3):207-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10006-1419

Suzuki S, Yukiko F. Length of the umbilical cord and perinatal outcomes in Japanese singleton pregnancies delivered at greater than or equal to 34 weeks’ gestation. J Clin Gynecol Obstet. 2012;1(4-5):57-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4021/jcgo62w

Dias Z, Kore S. Length of the umbilical cord and perinatal outcomes: a study of 500 deliveries. New Indian J Obgyn. 2023;9(2):228-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21276/obgyn.2023.9.2.7

Sharif M, Arani K, Soleimani G, Akhavirad S, Kheirkhah D. The relationship between the length of umbilical cord and neonatal outcomes. J Res Medical Dental Sci. 2017;5(6):1-5.

Nandini B, Deepali J, Balgopal B, Shaheen D, Jyothi DN. Relationship Between Umbilical Cord Length and Maternal and Foetal Outcome. Paripex Indian J Res. 2016;4(7):114-7.

Malpas P. Length of the human umbilical cord at term. Br Med J. 1964;1(5384):673-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.5384.673

Qin Y, Lau TK, Rogers MS. Second‐trimester ultrasonographic assessment of the umbilical coiling index. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;20(5):458-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00846.x

Strong TH, Finberg HJ, Mattox JH. Antepartum diagnosis of noncoiled umbilical cords. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170(6):1729-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(94)70348-5

Linde LE, Rasmussen S, Kessler J, Ebbing C. Extreme umbilical cord lengths, cord knot and entanglement: Risk factors and risk of adverse outcomes, a population-based study. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0194814. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194814

Vasa R, Dimitrov R, Patel S. Nuchal cord at delivery and perinatal outcomes: Single-center retrospective study, with emphasis on fetal acid-base balance. Pediatr Neonatol. 2018;59(5):439-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedneo.2018.03.002

Shafqat T, Hussain SS, Rahim R. Length of umbilical cord and perinatal outcome. J Postgraduate Med Inst. 2020;34(2):115-8.

Balkawade NU, Shinde MA. Study of length of umbilical cord and fetal Outcome: A study of 1,000 deliveries. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2012;62(5):520-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-012-0194-0

Patel RD, Panchal V, Harsh H, Zalawadia BB. Study of length of umbilical cord and fetal outcome. Indian J Applied-Basic Med Sci. 2022;24(38):196-201.

Nandhini S, Anuradha CR, Renuka S, Vijayalakshmi K, Sailatha R. Incidence of umbilical cord around the neck and its eﬀects on mode of delivery and fetal outcome at tertiary care hospital. Int J Rep Contra Obstet Gynecol. 2021;10(2):516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20205924

Kulshrestha K, Sukla D, Verma K. Umbilical cord abnormalities and Maternal and Perinatal Outcome: a Prospective Observational study. J Clin Diag Res. 2021;15(4):QC05-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2021/46830.14720

Hebbar S, Yashaswini S. An observational study of effect of umbilical cord entanglement on mode of delivery and perinatal outcome. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2024;2(1):12-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jogyp-11012-0024