Evaluation of sepsis in obstetric score: a novel scoring system for obstetric population, a tertiary care centre study

Shakuntla Kumari; Seema Dwivedi; Preeti Singh; Garima Sharma; Pratima Verma

doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20253090

Authors

Shakuntla Kumari Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, GSVM Medical College, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
Seema Dwivedi Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, GSVM Medical College, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
Preeti Singh Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, GSVM Medical College, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
Garima Sharma Department of Pathology, GSVM Medical College, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
Pratima Verma Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, GSVM Medical College, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20253090

Keywords:

Intensive care unit, Maternal mortality, Organ dysfunction

Abstract

Background: Sepsis remains the second leading cause of maternal mortality, affecting approximately 5.7 per 10,000 pregnancies. Delayed recognition and escalation of care contribute to preventable deaths. The Sepsis in Obstetrics Score (SOS), designed by Albright et al. to predict critical care needs in pregnant and postpartum women, has limited validation data. This study evaluates SOS in predicting maternal and neonatal outcomes in septic obstetric patients.

Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 50 pregnant, post-abortal, and postpartum women with sepsis at GSVM Medical College, Kanpur. Patients with pre-existing organ disease were excluded. SOS was calculated using clinical and laboratory parameters, with scores <6 classified as non-severe and ≥6 as severe sepsis. Outcomes assessed included ICU admission, organ dysfunction, maternal and neonatal mortality, and hospital stay. ROC analysis determined the optimal cutoff for predicting mortality.

Results: Mortality rose with higher SOS scores: 5.3% (0–2), 18.2% (3–5), 30% (6–8), and 71.4% (9–11). ICU admission and multi-organ failure were significantly more frequent in the ≥6 group. Neonatal outcomes were worse among high-score mothers, with more NICU admissions (5 vs. 1) and stillbirths (9 vs. 6). ROC analysis showed good predictive accuracy (AUROC 0.859, p<0.001). A cutoff ≥5 predicted mortality with 92.3% sensitivity, 62.2% specificity, and 70% diagnostic accuracy, outperforming the traditional ≥6 threshold by identifying high-risk women earlier.

Conclusions: SOS is a reliable triage tool for obstetric sepsis. A threshold ≥5 enables earlier ICU transfer, timely intervention, and improved maternal and perinatal outcomes, supporting its integration into routine obstetric care.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Petersen EE, Davis NL, Goodman D, Cox S, Mayes N, Johnston E, et al. Vital signs: pregnancy-related deaths, United States, 2011-2015, and strategies for prevention, 13 states, 2013-2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2019;68:423–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6818e1

Kendle AM, Salemi JL, Tanner JP, Louis JM. Delivery-associated sepsis: trends in prevalence and mortality. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;220:391.e1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.02.002

Hensley MK, Bauer ME, Admon LK, Prescott HC. Incidence of maternal sepsis and sepsis-related maternal deaths in the United States. JAMA 2019;322:890–2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.9818

Creanga AA, Syverson C, Seed K, Callaghan WM. Pregnancy-related mortality in the United States, 2011-2013. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130:366–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002114

Seacrist MJ, Morton CH, VanOtterloo LR, Main EK. Quality improvement opportunities identified through case review of pregnancy-related deaths from sepsis. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2019;48:311–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2019.02.007

Bauer ME, Lorenz RP, Bauer ST, Rao K, Anderson FW. Maternal deaths due to sepsis in the state of Michigan, 1999-2006. Obstet Gynecol 2015;126:747–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001028

Turner MJ. Maternal sepsis is an evolving challenge. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019;146(1):39-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12833

Albright CM, Ali TN, Lopes V, Rouse DJ, Anderson BL. The Sepsis in Obstetrics Score: a model to identify risk of morbidity from sepsis in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211(1):39.e1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.03.010

Oud L. Pregnancy associated severe sepsis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2016;28:73–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0000000000000250

Meh C, Sharma A, Ram U, Fadel S, Correa N, Snelgrove JW, et al. Trends in maternal mortality in India over two decades in nationally representative surveys. BJOG: An Int J Obstetrics Gynaecol. 2022;129(4):550-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16888

Comstedt P, Storgaard M, Lassen AT. The Systemic Inﬂammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) in acutely hospitalised medical patients: A cohort study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2009;17:67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-17-67

Agarwal R, Yadav RK, Mohta M, Sikka M, Radhakrishnan G. Sepsis in Obstetrics Score (SOS) utility and validation for triaging patients with obstetric sepsis in the emergency department: Evidence from a low-income health care setting. Obstet Med. 2019;12(2):90-6.

Aarvold AB, Ryan HM, Magee LA. Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score is superior to the obstetric-specific sepsis in obstetrics score in predicting mortality in septic obstetric patients. Crit Care Med. 2017;45:e49–e57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000002018

Albright CM, Mehta ND, Rouse DJ, Hughes BL. Sepsis in pregnancy: identification and management. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2016;30:95–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JPN.0000000000000159

Agarwal R, Yadav RK, Mohta M, Sikka M, Radhakrishnan G. Sepsis in Obstetrics Score (SOS) utility and validation for triaging patients with obstetric sepsis in the emergency department: Evidence from a low-income health care setting. Obstet Med. 2019;12(2):90-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1753495X18761522