Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome: a case report and surgical approach for neovagina construction

Ruby Bhatia; Chetna Yadav; Kashish Singla; Mahak Singhaal; Arushi Mittal

doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20260902

Authors

Ruby Bhatia Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, MMIMSR, Ambala, Haryana, India
Chetna Yadav Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, MMIMSR, Ambala, Haryana, India
Kashish Singla Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, MMIMSR, Ambala, Haryana, India
Mahak Singhaal Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, MMIMSR, Ambala, Haryana, India
Arushi Mittal Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, MMIMSR, Ambala, Haryana, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20260902

Keywords:

Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome, Müllerian agenesis, Primary amenorrhea, Vaginal agenesis, Müllerian duct anomalies, Neovagina

Abstract

Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome is a rare congenital anomaly characterized by agenesis or hypoplasia of the uterus and upper two-thirds of the vagina in phenotypically normal females with a 46, XX karyotype. Despite normal ovarian function and secondary sexual characteristics, affected individuals present with primary amenorrhea. We report the case of a 21-year-old female presenting with primary amenorrhea and normal secondary sexual development. Pelvic MRI demonstrated complete uterovaginal agenesis with small fibrofatty structures suggestive of uterine buds, and normal bilateral ovaries. Hormonal profile was within normal limits, except for mildly elevated thyroid-stimulating hormone. After multidisciplinary counselling, the patient underwent neovaginoplasty using a modified McIndoe technique with an amniotic membrane graft and foam mold support. Postoperative care included gradual mold dilations and psychological support. At follow-up, the neovagina maintained adequate depth (>8 cm) and caliber, with satisfactory functional outcome and no early complications. Surgical neovaginoplasty using amniotic grafts is a safe and effective option for MRKH patients when nonsurgical methods are unsuitable. Success depends on meticulous surgical technique, structured postoperative dilation, and comprehensive psychological counseling.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Bhatia R, Aishwarya KK, Kalyanam R. Primary amenorrhea with aplastic uterus, bilateral non- communicating rudimentary horns with hematometra in left horn and cervicovaginal aplasia (USA C4 V4)- a rarest case report. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2023;14(12):5722-4.

Bhatia R, Gupta R, Arora T, Jain S. Davydov’s procedure: innovative method for creation of neovagina. Int J Med Sci Innov Res. 2020;5(4):258-62.

Morcel K, Guerrier D, Watrin T, Pellerin I, Levêque J. The Mayer-Rokitan-Sky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome: clinical description and genetics. J Gynecol ObstetBiol Reprod (Paris). 2008;37(6):539-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgyn.2008.07.002

Griffin JE, Edwards C, Madden JD, Harrod MJ, Wilson JD. Congenital absence of the vagina. The Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Ann Intern Med. 1976;85(2):224-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-85-2-224

Oppelt P, Renner SP, Kellermann A, Sara B, Georges AH, Kurt SL, et al. Clinical aspects of Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome: recommendations for clinical diagnosis and staging. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(3):792-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dei381

Morcel K, Camborieux L, Programme de Recherche sur les Aplasies Mülléri-pennes, Guerrier D. Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2007;2:13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1172-2-13

Carr NR, Hann LE, Brotman S. MR imaging of müllerian duct anomalies: comparison with US, surgical, and clinical findings. Radiology. 1995;194(3):797-802.

Edmonds DK. Congenital malformations of the genital tract and their man- agement. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;17(1):19-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/ybeog.2003.0356

Pan HX, Zhu L, Chen J, Lang JH. Comparison of amnion and split-thickness skin grafts in vaginoplasty. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013;120(2):183-6.

Bhatt NR, Gupta S, Singh P. Amnion graft vaginoplasty in MRKH syndrome: a case series. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2021;71(3):283-8.

Callens N, De Cuypere G, De Sutter P, Stan M, Steven W, Piet H, et al. An update on surgical and non-surgical treatment options for vaginal agenesis in MRKH syndrome. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(5):775-801. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmu024

Banerjee S, Singhal S, Agarwal N. Evaluation of vaginal mold use post vaginoplasty in MRKH syndrome. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(9):QR01-3.