Broad ligament fibroid-clinical presentation and surgical challenges: a case series

Authors

  • Sheral Raina Tauro Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal, Manipur, India https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5668-4269
  • Ningthoujam Priyalaxmi Devi Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal, Manipur, India
  • Laishram Trinity Meetei Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal, Manipur, India https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8576-9166
  • Sayan Sen Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal, Manipur, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20253549

Keywords:

Broad ligament fibroid, Ureter injury, Uterine fibroid

Abstract

Uterine leiomyomas are benign monoclonal tumors originating from smooth muscle tissue. Their classification is based on anatomical location, with each type presenting unique surgical challenges, particularly in cases involving large, long-standing fibroids in atypical positions. These challenges often stem from limited access to the operative field, distorted pelvic anatomy, difficulty in performing surgical repairs, and increased risk of blood loss. Managing such complex fibroids requires both surgical expertise and refined technique, especially when performing intricate hysterectomies. In this case series of five patients, we examine the varied presentations of broad ligament fibroids, associated clinical findings, and the operative difficulties encountered. Tailored approaches are essential, as each fibroid type demands a specific surgical strategy. Preoperative imaging for fibroid mapping, along with ureteric stenting when indicated, plays a crucial role in minimizing intraoperative complications. Adherence to established surgical principles ensures optimal outcomes, reduces the risk of urinary tract injury, and helps control blood loss during surgery.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Kumar P, Malhotra N. Tumours of the corpus uteri and tumours of the pelvic ligament. In: Jeffcoat’s Principles of Gynaecology. 7th ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. 2008;487-516.

Naz Masood S, Masood Y, Mathrani J. Diagnostic dilemma in broad ligament leiomyoma with cystic degeneration. Pak J Med Sci. 2014;30:452-4.

Stewart EA, Laughlin-Tommaso SK, Catherino WH, Lalitkumar S, Gupta D, Vollenhoven B. Uterine fibroids. Nat Rev. 2016;2:1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2016.43

Donnez J, Marie-Madeleine Dolmans M-M. Uterine fibroid management: from the present to the future. Hum Reprod Update. 2016;22(6):665-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmw023

Vilos GA, Allaire C, Laberge PY, Leyland N. The management of uterine leiomyomas. SOGC Clinical Practice Guideline. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015;37(2):157-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30338-8

Berek JS. Benign diseases of the female reproductive tract. In: Berek and Novak’s Gynaecology. 14th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. 2006;469.

Gowri V, Sudheendra R, Oumachigui A, Sankaran V. Giant broad ligament leiomyoma. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1992;37:207-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7292(92)90383-T

Rajanna DK, Pandey V, Janardhan S, Datti SN. Broad ligament fibroid mimicking as ovarian tumor on ultrasonography and computed tomography scan. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2013;3:8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/2156-7514.107912

Bansal P, Garg D. A case of massive broad ligament leiomyoma imitating an ovarian tumour. J Clin Diagn Res 2014;8:136-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2014/7642.4136

Naz Masood S, Masood Y, Mathrani J. Diagnostic dilemma in broad ligament leiomyoma with cystic degeneration. Pak J Med Sci. 2014;30:452-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.302.4361

Downloads

Published

2025-10-29

How to Cite

Tauro, S. R., Devi, N. P., Meetei, L. T., & Sen, S. (2025). Broad ligament fibroid-clinical presentation and surgical challenges: a case series. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 14(11), 3991–3994. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20253549

Issue

Section

Case Series