Prevalence, immediate neonatal outcomes, and factors associated with short birth intervals among mothers delivered at Mubende Regional Referral Hospital, Uganda

Authors

  • Ahmed Hassan Maryan Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kampala International University, Kampala, Uganda
  • John Elioba Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kampala International University, Kampala, Uganda
  • Maxwell Okello Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kampala International University, Kampala, Uganda
  • Paul Byaruhanga Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kampala International University, Kampala, Uganda
  • Abdirizak Mohamed Omar Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kampala International University, Kampala, Uganda

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20253510

Keywords:

Immediate neonatal outcomes, Kampala International University, Postpartum mothers, Short birth interval, Yei civil hospital

Abstract

Background: Short birth intervals (SBIs) pose significant public health risks, particularly in low-resource settings like Uganda, where they are associated with adverse neonatal outcomes. Despite WHO recommendations for optimal birth spacing, high rates of SBIs persist, largely due to socio-economic, cultural, and healthcare access challenges. This study aimed to determine the prevalence, immediate neonatal outcomes, and associated factors of SBIs among mothers at Mubende Regional Referral Hospital.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from May to August 2024, involving 422 postpartum mothers. Data on sociodemographic, obstetric, and behavioral factors were collected, and logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with SBIs and assess the impact on neonatal outcomes, including small for gestational age, preterm birth, early neonatal death, and External congenital defects.

Results: The study revealed an SBI prevalence of 40.3%. The most common adverse neonatal outcomes were Small for gestational age (31%), and preterm birth (26%). Key factors associated with SBIs included young maternal age (<20 years, aOR 2.18, 95% CI: 1.13-4.22), rural residence (aOR 2.84, 95% CI: 1.69-4.78), lack of antenatal care (aOR 4.64, 95% CI: 1.80-11.95), unplanned pregnancies (aOR 2.15, 95% CI: 1.35-3.41), and short breastfeeding duration (<12 months, aOR 3.26, 95% CI: 2.05-5.20).

Conclusions: The study identified a high prevalence of SBIs, with significant associations to adverse neonatal outcomes such as Small for gestational age, and preterm birth. Factors contributing to SBIs included young maternal age, rural residence, limited antenatal care, and unplanned pregnancies, are highlighting the need for targeted family planning and maternal health interventions.

 

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Alter G, Hacker JD. The impact of multiple births on fertility: Stopping and spacing in the United States during the demographic transition. Demograph. 2024;61(5):1509-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/00703370-11577526

Buissink JD. Regional differences in marital fertility in the Netherlands in the second half of the nineteenth century. Population Stud. 1971;25(3):353-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.1971.10405812

Bongaarts J. Modeling the fertility impact of the proximate determinants: Time for a tune-up. Demograph Res. 2015;33(19):535-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2015.33.19

Rodríguez G, Cleland J. The effects of birth spacing on fertility: Evidence from Latin America. Studies in Family Planning. 1981;12(3):169-78.

Elioba JL, Hakizimana T, Atuhaire S, Ishimwe MP, Naranjo UA, Ramirez FP. Predictors of short birth interval among women of reproductive age attending the young child clinic at a tertiary hospital in Western Uganda: a cross-section study. Int J Reproduct Contracep Obstetr Gynecol.;12(12):3453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20233617

World Health Organization. Report of a WHO technical consultation on birth spacing: Geneva, Switzerland, 2005. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42903. Accessed 01 June 2025.

Conde‑Agudelo A, Rosas‑Bermúdez A, Kafury‑Goeta AC. Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: A meta‑analysis. Int J Gynecol Obstetr. 2012;117(2):93-101.

Uganda Bureau of Statistcs (UBOS) and ICF. Uganda demographic and health survey 2016: key indicators report. Kampala, Uganda. 2017.

Rutstein SO. Trends in birth spacing, DHS Comparative Reports. Calverton, MD, USA: ICF Macro. 2011(28).

Li W. Specific birth defects in pregnancies of women with diabetes: caution on bias. Am J Obstetr Gynecol. 2020;223(3):465-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.04.010

Aleni M, Mbalinda SN, Muhindo R. Birth intervals and associated factors among women attending young child clinic in Yumbe Hospital, Uganda. Int J Reproduct Medi. 2020;2020(1):1326596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1326596

Aklil MB, Anteneh KT, Debele TZ, Temesgan WZ. Short birth interval and associated factors among women who gave birth in the last three years in Dembecha district, Northwest Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2022;17(8):e0272612. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272612

Moyer CA, McLaren ZM, Adanu RM, Lantz PM. Understanding the relationship between access to care and facility-based delivery through analysis of the 2008 Ghana Demographic Health Survey. Int J Gynecol Obstetr. 2013;122(3):224-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.04.005

Yaya S, Uthman OA, Ekholuenetale M, Bishwajit G, Adjiwanou V. Effects of birth spacing on adverse childhood health outcomes: evidence from 34 countries in sub-Saharan Africa. J Maternal-Fetal Neonat Medi. 2020;33(20):3501-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2019.1576623

Nisha MK, Alam A, Islam MT, Huda T, Raynes-Greenow C. Risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with short and long birth intervals in Bangladesh: evidence from six Bangladesh Demographic and Health Surveys, 1996-2014. BMJ open. 2019;9(2):e024392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024392

Bauserman M, Nowak K, Nolen TL, Patterson J, Lokangaka A, Tshefu A, et al. The relationship between birth intervals and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in six low and lower-middle income countries. Reproductive health. 2020;17(Suppl 2):157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-01008-4

Belachew TB, Asmamaw DB, Negash WD. Short birth interval and its predictors among reproductive age women in high fertility countries in sub-Saharan Africa: a multilevel analysis of recent Demographic and Health Surveys. BMC Pregn Childb. 2023;23(1):81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05403-0

Nausheen S, Bhura M, Hackett K, Hussain I, Shaikh Z, Rizvi A, et al. Determinants of short birth intervals among married women: a cross-sectional study in Karachi, Pakistan. BMJ open. 2021;11(4):e043786. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043786

Minja J, Rweyemamu LP, Joho AA, Moshi FV, Shamba D, Mbotwa CH. Prevalence of short inter-birth intervals and associated factors among women of reproductive age: evidence from a nationally representative survey in Tanzania. BMC Pregn Childb. 2025;25(1):185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-07026-5

Wakeyo MM, Kebira JY, Assefa N, Dheresa M. Short birth interval and its associated factors among multiparous women in Mieso agro-pastoralist district, Eastern Ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study. Front Glob Women's Heal. 2022;3:801394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2022.801394

Downloads

Published

2025-10-29

How to Cite

Maryan, A. H., Elioba, J., Okello, M., Byaruhanga, P., & Omar, A. M. (2025). Prevalence, immediate neonatal outcomes, and factors associated with short birth intervals among mothers delivered at Mubende Regional Referral Hospital, Uganda. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 14(11), 3709–3714. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20253510

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles