Sperm selection techniques in assisted reproduction: a comprehensive review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20253569Keywords:
Assisted reproductive technology, ICSI, IMSI, MACS, Microfluidics, Male infertility, PICSI, Sperm selectionAbstract
Sperm selection plays a pivotal role in assisted reproductive technology (ART), directly influencing fertilization rates, embryo development and overall clinical outcomes. While conventional methods such as swim-up and density gradient centrifugation methods are in clinical practice, they offer limited precision in identifying spermatozoa with optimal functional ability and DNA integrity. In response to these limitations, a range of advanced sperm selection techniques has emerged, aiming to improve the selection of high-quality spermatozoa. This review explores the principle, methodologies and clinical evidence behind both established and emerging sperm selection methods. Techniques discussed include magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS), microfluidic sperm sorting (MSS), hyaluronic acid binding assay/ physiological intracytoplasmic sperm injection (HBA/PICSI) and high-magnification selection methods like intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI). Additionally, novel technologies such as Raman spectroscopy, polarized light microscopy and surface charge-based selection (Zeta potential) are examined for their potential applications in reproductive medicine. While early results suggest these advanced methods may enhance ART outcomes, particularly in cases of male factor infertility, further large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm their clinical utility and define their optimal use. This review aims to provide ART practitioners with a comprehensive overview of the evolving landscape of sperm selection in ART, highlighting both current practices and future directions.
Metrics
References
Dabbagh Rezaeiye R, Mehrara A, Ali Pour AM, Fallahi J, Forouhari S. Impact of various parameters as predictors of the success rate of in vitro fertilization. Int J Fertil Steril. 2022;16(2):76–84.
Baldini D, Ferri D, Baldini GM, Lot D, Catino A, Vizziello D, et al. Sperm Selection for ICSI: Do We Have a Winner. Cells. 2021;10(12):3566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10123566
World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen, 6th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2021.
Esteves SC, Sánchez-Martín F, Sánchez-Martín P, Schneider DT, Gosálvez J. Comparison of reproductive outcome in oligozoospermic men with high sperm DNA fragmentation undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection with ejaculated and testicular sperm. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(6):1398–405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.08.028
Agarwal A, Sharma R, Gupta S, Finelli R, Parekh N, Panner Selvam MK, et al. Sperm Morphology Assessment in the Era of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection: Reliable Results Require Focus on Standardization, Quality Control and Training. World J Mens Health. 2022;40(3):347–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5534/wjmh.210054
Agarwal A, Mulgund A, Hamada A, Chyatte MR. A unique view on male infertility around the globe. Reprod Biol Endocrinol RBE. 2015;13:37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-015-0032-1
Levine H, Jørgensen N, Martino-Andrade A, Mendiola J, Weksler-Derri D, Mindlis I, et al. Temporal trends in sperm count: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(6):646–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmx022
Tiptiri-Kourpeti A, Asimakopoulos B, Nikolettos N. A Narrative Review on the Sperm Selection Methods in Assisted Reproductive Technology: Out with the New, the Old Is Better. J Clin Med. 2025;14(4):1066. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14041066
Miller D, Pavitt S, Sharma V, Forbes G, Hooper R, Bhattacharya S, et al. Physiological, hyaluronan-selected intracytoplasmic sperm injection for infertility treatment (HABSelect): a parallel, two-group, randomised trial. Lancet Lond Engl. 2019;393(10170):416–22.
Bartoov B, Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Kogosowski A, Menezo Y, Barak Y. Real-time fine morphology of motile human sperm cells is associated with IVF-ICSI outcome. J Androl. 2002;23(1):1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1939-4640.2002.tb02595.x
Nasr Esfahani MH, Deemeh MR, Tavalaee M, Sekhavati MH, Gourabi H. Zeta Sperm Selection Improves Pregnancy Rate and Alters Sex Ratio in Male Factor Infertility Patients: A Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial. Int J Fertil Steril. 2016;10(2):253–60.
Raad G, Bakos HW, Bazzi M, Mourad Y, Fakih F, Shayya S, et al. Differential impact of four sperm preparation techniques on sperm motility, morphology, DNA fragmentation, acrosome status, oxidative stress and mitochondrial activity: A prospective study. Andrology. 2021;9(5):1549–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.13038
Ali AH, Ajina T, Ali MB, Mehdi M. Efficacy of density gradient centrifugation technique (DGC) in enhancing sperm cell DNA quality for assisted reproductive technique. Middle East Fertil Soc J. 2022;22:27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43043-022-00108-4
Pacheco A, Blanco A, Bronet F, Cruz M, García-Fernández J, García-Velasco JA. Magnetic-Activated Cell Sorting (MACS): A Useful Sperm-Selection Technique in Cases of High Levels of Sperm DNA Fragmentation. J Clin Med. 2020;8;9(12):3976.
Zhang X, Chao S, Ye N, Ouyang D. Emerging trends in sperm selection: enhancing success rates in assisted reproduction. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024;14;22(1):67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-024-01239-1
Quinn MM, Jalalian L, Ribeiro S, Ona K, Demirci U, Cedars MI, et al. Microfluidic sorting selects sperm for clinical use with reduced DNA damage compared to density gradient centrifugation with swim-up in split semen samples. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2018;1;33(8):1388–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dey239
Shirota K, Yotsumoto F, Itoh H, Obama H, Hidaka N, Nakajima K, et al. Separation efficiency of a microfluidic sperm sorter to minimize sperm DNA damage. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(2):315-321.e1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.10.023
Bartoov B, Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Kogosovsky A, Yagoda A, Lederman H, et al. Pregnancy rates are higher with intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection than with conventional intracytoplasmic injection. Fertil Steril. 2003;80(6):1413–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.05.016
Setti AS, Figueira R de CS, Braga DPAF, Iaconelli A, Borges E. Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection benefits for patients with oligoasthenozoospermia according to the 2010 World Health Organization reference values. Fertil Steril. 2011;30;95(8):2711–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.03.003
Boitrelle F, Guthauser B, Alter L, Bailly M, Bergere M, Wainer R, et al. High-magnification selection of spermatozoa prior to oocyte injection: confirmed and potential indications. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;28(1):6–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.09.019
Parmegiani L, Cognigni GE, Bernardi S, Troilo E, Taraborrelli S, Arnone A, et al. Comparison of two ready-to-use systems designed for sperm-hyaluronic acid binding selection before intracytoplasmic sperm injection: PICSI vs. Sperm Slow: a prospective, randomized trial. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(3):632–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.043
Beck-Fruchter R, Shalev E, Weiss A. Clinical benefit using sperm hyaluronic acid binding technique in ICSI cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2016;32(3):286–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.12.001
Miller D, Pavitt S, Sharma V, Forbes G, Hooper R, Bhattacharya S, et al. Physiological, hyaluronan-selected intracytoplasmic sperm injection for infertility treatment (HABSelect): a parallel, two-group, randomised trial. Lancet Lond Engl. 2019;2;393(10170):416–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32989-1
Ainsworth C, Nixon B, Aitken RJ. Development of a novel electrophoretic system for the isolation of human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2005;1;20(8):2261–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dei024
Chan PJ, Jacobson JD, Corselli JU, Patton WC. A simple zeta method for sperm selection based on membrane charge. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(2):481–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.07.1302
Huser T, Orme CA, Hollars CW, Corzett MH, Balhorn R. Raman spectroscopy of DNA packaging in individual human sperm cells distinguishes normal from abnormal cells. J Biophotonics. 2009;2(5):322–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.200910012
Gianaroli L, Magli MC, Collodel G, Moretti E, Ferraretti AP, Baccetti B. Sperm head’s birefringence: a new criterion for sperm selection. Fertil Steril. 2008;1;90(1):104–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.05.078
Eisenbach M. Sperm navigation in humans: a concerted action of multiple means. Commun Biol. 2025;8(1):923. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-025-08358-4
ESHRE Add-ons working group, Lundin K, Bentzen JG, Bozdag G, Ebner T, Harper J, et al. Good practice recommendations on add-ons in reproductive medicine†. Hum Reprod. 2023;38(11):2062–104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dead184
Comprehensive guidance for human embryology andrology and endocrinology laboratories: management and operations: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2022;117(6):1183–202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.02.016
Gisbert Iranzo A, Cano-Extremera M, Hervás I, Falquet Guillem M, Gil Juliá M, Navarro-Gomezlechon A, et al. Sperm Selection Using Microfluidic Techniques Significantly Decreases Sperm DNA Fragmentation (SDF), Enhancing Reproductive Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Biology. 2025;14(7):792. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14070792
Pacheco A, Blanco A, Bronet F, Cruz M, García-Fernández J, García-Velasco JA. Magnetic-Activated Cell Sorting (MACS): A Useful Sperm-Selection Technique in Cases of High Levels of Sperm DNA Fragmentation. J Clin Med. 2020;9(12):3976. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9123976
De Vos A, Polyzos NP, Verheyen G, Tournaye H. Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI): a critical and evidence-based review. Basic Clin Androl. 2013;23:10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2051-4190-23-10
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
