Gangrenous torsion of a giant benign mucinous ovarian cystadenoma mimicking malignancy in a postmenopausal woman: a rare case report
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20253567Keywords:
Mucinous cystadenoma, Ovarian torsion, Post menopause, Gangrenous changes, Staging laparotomyAbstract
Giant mucinous cystadenomas are rare in postmenopausal women and may mimic ovarian malignancy, particularly when complicated by torsion or ischemic necrosis. Conventional tools such as the risk of malignancy index (RMI) and ovarian-adnexal reporting and data system (O-RADS) can be misleading in these situations. Although accurate distinction is desirable, when preoperative evaluation suggests high malignant potential, comprehensive staging surgery is justified to ensure oncologic safety, even if the lesion proves benign. A 75-year-old postmenopausal woman presented with 10 days of progressive abdominal distension, dull diffuse abdominal pain, anorexia, and weight loss. Examination revealed a large abdominopelvic mass corresponding to a 32-week gravid uterus. Tumor markers were normal (CA-125:32.1 U/ml< 35; CEA: 1.85 ng/ml<3). Ultrasonography and CT demonstrated a 20 cm multiloculated complex cystic adnexal mass with irregular mural nodules but no ascites or lymphadenopathy. Risk assessment suggested high malignant potential (elevated RMI score and O-RADS 4 category). A staging laparotomy was performed. Intraoperatively, a 30 cm torsed, gangrenous mucinous cystadenoma of the left ovary with intact capsule was identified. Surgical management included total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, pelvic lymphadenectomy, and omentectomy. Frozen section and final histopathology confirmed a benign mucinous cystadenoma with extensive gangrenous changes. This case highlights the diagnostic dilemma of differentiating complicated benign adnexal tumors from malignancy in elderly women. It emphasizes the limitations of preoperative risk models when torsion or necrosis distorts imaging features and supports comprehensive surgical staging in high-risk profiles, even when pathology is benign, thereby ensuring oncologic safety.
Metrics
References
Carvalho JP, Moretti-Marques R, Filho ALDS. Adnexal mass: diagnosis and management. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2020;42(7):438-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1715547
Torre LA, Trabert B, DeSantis CE, Miller KD, Samimi G, Runowicz CD, et al. Ovarian cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(4):284-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21456
Shanmugasundaram G, Sundaramoorthy E, Sudalaiandi S, Kondaveeti SS, Johnson T, Swaminathan R, et al. Double pathology: malignant epithelial ovarian tumor and germ cell tumor (choriocarcinoma), a rare coexistence. World J Oncol. 2015;6(4):421-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14740/wjon848w
Brown J, Frumovitz M. Mucinous tumors of the ovary: current thoughts on diagnosis and management. Curr Oncol Rep. 2014;16(6):389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-014-0389-x
Dawood MT, Naik M, Bharwani N, Sudderuddin SA, Rockall AG, Stewart VR. Adnexal torsion: review of radiologic appearances. Radiographics. 2021;41(2):609-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2021200118
Prabhu KJ, Chandrasekaran S, Sen M. Ovarian torsion in postmenopausal women with varied clinical presentations-a case series. J Indian Med Assoc. 2023;121(11):40-2.
Hegaab HM, El Sokkary H, Abo Elwafa R, Elzeity ES. Comparison of risk of malignancy indices in the preoperative evaluation of adnexal masses. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2022;11(5):1357-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20221262
Takkar N, Arora P, Goel B, Kaur R, Kaur N, Aggarwal P. Correlation of ovarian adnexal reporting and data system classification with histopathological examination in diagnosis of adnexal masses. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2025;14(2):578-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20250197
Wootipoom V, Dechsukhum C, Hanprasertpong J, Lim A. Accuracy of intraoperative frozen section in diagnosis of ovarian tumors. J Med Assoc Thai. 2006;89(5):577-82.
Akhras LN, Faroog S, AlSebay L. A 27-kg giant ovarian mucinous cystadenoma in a 72-year-old postmenopausal patient: a case report. Am J Case Rep. 2019;20:1601-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12659/AJCR.917490
Somagutta MR, Luvsannyam E, Jain MS, Elliott-Theberge K, Grewal AS, Pendyala SK, et al. A rare case of massive ovarian mucinous cystadenoma with postmenopausal bleeding. Cureus. 2020;12(9):e10198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.10198
Marwaha PD, Kaundal A, Bhavna, Malik N, Kaushal S. Ovarian torsion in a postmenopausal woman: a case report and review of literature. J Menopausal Med. 2023;29(3):134-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6118/jmm.23022
Tjokroprawiro BA, Novitasari K, Ulhaq RA. Torsion giant ovarian cysts in a postmenopausal woman with cervical cancer. Oxf Med Case Rep. 2025;2025(5):omaf054. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/omcr/omaf054
Sukkong K, Sananpanichkul P, Teerakidpisan P, Bhamarapravatana K, Suwannarurk K. High rate of gangrenous adnexal torsion: dilemma of a missing silent cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17(11):4981-4.
Wasnik AP, Menias CO, Platt JF, Lalchandani UR, Bedi DG, Elsayes KM. Multimodality imaging of ovarian cystic lesions: review with an imaging based algorithmic approach. World J Radiol. 2013;5(3):113-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v5.i3.113
Bardin R, Perl N, Mashiach R, Ram E, Orbach-Zinger S, Shmueli A, et al. Prediction of adnexal torsion by ultrasound in women with acute abdominal pain. Ultraschall Med. 2020;41(6):688-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1014-2593
Mashiach R, Melamed N, Gilad N, Ben-Shitrit G, Meizner I. Sonographic diagnosis of ovarian torsion: accuracy and predictive factors. J Ultrasound Med. 2011;30(9):1205-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2011.30.9.1205
Valsky DV, Esh-Broder E, Cohen SM, Lipschuetz M, Yagel S. Added value of the gray-scale whirlpool sign in the diagnosis of adnexal torsion. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;36(5):630-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.7732
Priyanka MB, Panda J, Samantroy S, Panda SR, Jena P. Comparison of four risk of malignancy indices for preoperative evaluation of ovarian masses: a prospective observational study. Cureus. 2023;15(7):e41539. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.41539
Jha P, Gupta A, Baran TM. Diagnostic performance of the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) ultrasound risk score in women in the United States. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(6):e2216370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.16370
Solis Cano DG, Cervantes Flores HA, De Los Santos Farrera O, Guzman Martinez NB, Soria Céspedes D. Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonography using ovarian-adnexal reporting and data system classification versus pathology findings for ovarian cancer. Cureus. 2021;13(9):e17646. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.17646
Jena M, Burela S. Role of frozen section in the diagnosis of ovarian masses: an institutional experience. J Med Sci Health. 2017;3(1):12-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46347/JMSH.2017.v03i01.003
Park JY, Lee SH, Kim KR, Kim YT, Nam JH. Accuracy of frozen section diagnosis and factors associated with final pathological diagnosis upgrade of mucinous ovarian tumors. J Gynecol Oncol. 2019;30(6):e95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e95