Gestational trends in uterine artery pulsatility index and maternal blood pressure among pregnant women at 11-14 weeks to 34 weeks of gestation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20253893Keywords:
Uterine artery pulsatility index, Mean arterial pressure, Pre-eclampsia, Fetal growth restriction, PregnancyAbstract
Background: Pre-eclampsia (PE) and fetal growth restriction (FGR) are significant obstetric complications associated with impaired placental perfusion and adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Uterine artery pulsatility index (PI) and maternal mean arterial pressure (MAP) are established biophysical markers for predicting these conditions. However, longitudinal evaluation of these parameters in low-resource populations remains limited. This study aimed to assess gestational trends in uterine artery PI and MAP from 11–14 weeks to 34 weeks of gestation and their association with pregnancy outcomes.
Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted over 18 months at a private medical college in Kerala, India. Pregnant women with singleton pregnancies at 11–14 weeks undergoing routine nuchal translucency scans were enrolled (n=128). Uterine artery Doppler and MAP were measured at 11–14, 20–24 and 30–34 weeks of gestation. PI was obtained using standard Doppler techniques and MAP was calculated from four arm measurements. Data were analyzed using paired-samples t tests, with p<0.05 considered statistically significant.
Results: The mean uterine artery PI decreased progressively from 1.6±0.4 at 11–14 weeks to 1.1±0.4 at 20–24 weeks and further to 0.8±0.2 at 30–34 weeks (p<0.01). MAP remained relatively stable across gestation, within normal physiological ranges. The cohort was predominantly young (21–30 years, 60.9%) and primigravida (57.8%).
Conclusions: Uterine artery PI shows a significant progressive decline with advancing gestation, reflecting normal uteroplacental adaptation, while MAP remains stable, indicating adequate cardiovascular adjustment. These findings support the utility of uterine artery Doppler and MAP monitoring in predicting adverse pregnancy outcomes and highlight the need for population-specific reference ranges.
Metrics
References
Obstetricians ACo G. Hypertension in pregnancy. Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ task force on hypertension in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(5):1122.
Jiang L, Tang K, Magee LA, von Dadelszen P, Ekeroma A, Li X, et al. A global view of hypertensive disorders and diabetes mellitus during pregnancy. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2022;18(12):760-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41574-022-00734-y
Mohapatra I, Harshini N, Samantaray SR, Naik G. Association Between Early Pregnancy Body Mass Index and Gestational Weight Gain in Relation to Neonatal Birth Weight. Cureus. 2022;14(7):27089. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.27089
Poon LC, Shennan A, Hyett JA, Kapur A, Hadar E, Divakar H, et al. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) initiative on pre-eclampsia: A pragmatic guide for first-trimester screening and prevention. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019;145(1):1-33.
Duley L. Maternal mortality associated with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992;99(7):547-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1992.tb13818.x
Kuklina EV, Ayala C, Callaghan WM. Hypertensive disorders and severe obstetric morbidity in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113:1299-306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181a45b25
Calkins K, Devaskar SU. Fetal origins of adult disease. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2011;41(6):158-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cppeds.2011.01.001
Wright D, Syngelaki A, Akolekar R, Poon LC, Nicolaides KH. Competing risks model in screening for preeclampsia by maternal characteristics and medical history. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(1):62-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.02.018
Poon LC, Shennan A, Hyett JA, Kapur A, Hadar E, Divakar H, et al. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) initiative on pre-eclampsia: A pragmatic guide for first-trimester screening and prevention. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019;145(1):1-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12802
Baghel A, Patekar TY, Choorakuttil RM, Sharma LK, Satarkar SR, Gupta A, et al. A Comparison of Changes in the Mean Arterial Blood Pressure and Mean Uterine Artery Pulsatility Index from 11-14 to 19-24 + 6 Gestation Weeks in Low-Risk and High-Risk Asian Indian Pregnant Women. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2023;33(2):195-200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1761250
Gómez O, Figueras F, Fernández S, Bennasar M, Martínez JM, Puerto B, et al. Reference ranges for uterine artery mean pulsatility index at 11-41 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;32(2):128-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.5315
Cavoretto PI, Rossi E, Macchi E, Viganò P, Stampalija T, Farina A, et al. Reference ranges for uterine artery pulsatility index from first to third trimester based on serial Doppler measurements: longitudinal cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023;62(3):415-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.26092
Plasencia W, Maiz N, Bonino S, Kaihura C, Nicolaides KH. Uterine artery Doppler at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks in the prediction of pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;30(5):742-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.5157
Tan MY, Poon LC, Rolnik DL, Syngelaki A, de Paco Matallana C, Akolekar R, et al. Prediction and prevention of small-for-gestational-age neonates: evidence from SPREE and ASPRE. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;52(1):52-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.19077
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
