A cross-sectional study to determine the challenges in minimally invasive gynaecological surgeries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20254277Keywords:
Minimally invasive surgery, Intraoperative complications, Postoperative complications, Non-surgical complications, Procedural complexity and surgeons experienceAbstract
Background: Minimally invasive gynaecological surgery is widely practiced, yet it is associated with specific surgical and non-surgical challenges. This cross-sectional study aimed to assess the challenges and complications encountered during minimally invasive gynaecological surgeries at a tertiary healthcare centre.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from May 2022 to April 2023 at a tertiary care centre. All women undergoing laparoscopic gynaecological surgeries were included, excluding laparoscopic tubectomy and malignancy cases. Data were obtained from medical records and included age, parity, indication for surgery, intraoperative difficulties, duration of surgery, and postoperative outcomes.
Results: Most patients were aged 21-40 years (57.5%), belonged to the middle socioeconomic class (70%), and were multiparous (para 2-3). Common indications included abnormal uterine bleeding (38.8%), uterine fibroids (26.3%), and ovarian cysts/endometrioma (25%). Total laparoscopic hysterectomy was the most frequently performed procedure (33.8%), followed by diagnostic hysterolaparoscopy (18.8%). The overall complication rate was 31.25%, with major complications in 11.25% and minor complications in 20% of cases. Intraoperative bleeding requiring blood transfusion occurred in 6.25% cases, organ injuries in 3.75%, and conversion to laparotomy in 5%. Technical difficulties such as equipment issues or staff unavailability were noted in 12.25% cases. Postoperative complications included fever (10%), ureteric injury (2.5%), urinary tract infection (3.75%), stress urinary incontinence (2.5%), and vaginal cuff dehiscence (1.25%). Most surgeries lasted 121-180 minutes (45%).
Conclusions: Minimally invasive gynaecological surgeries are generally safe but not without risk. Higher complication rates may be related to procedural complexity and surgeon experience. Individualized patient assessment, surgical expertise, and adequate resources are essential to reduce complications.
References
Alessandri F, Lijoi D, Mistrangelo E, Ferrero S, Ragni N. Randomized study of laparoscopic versus minilaparotomic myomectomy for uterine myomas. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2006;13(2):92-7.
Mais V, Ajossa S, Guerriero S, Mascia M, Solla E, Melis GB. Laparoscopic versus abdominal myomectomy: a prospective, randomized trial toevaluate benefits in early outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174(2):654-8.
Murphy AA, Nager CW, Wujek JJ, Kettel LM, Torp VA, Chin HG. Operative laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of ectopic pregnancy: a prospective trial. Fertil Steril. 1992;57(6):1180-5.
Johnston K, Rosen D, Cario G. Major complications arising from 1265 operative laparoscopic cases: a prospective review from a single center. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14:339-44.
Magrina JF. Complications of laparoscopic surgery. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2002;45(2):469-80.
Fuentes MN, Rodríguez-Oliver A, Naveiro Rilo JC, Paredes AG, Aguilar Romero MT, Parra JF. Complications of laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. JSLS. 2014;18(3):2014.
Chapron C, Querleu D, Bruhat MA. Surgical complications of diagnostic and operative gynaecological laparoscopy: a series of 29,966 cases. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:867-72.
Molloy D, Kaloo PD, Cooper M, Nguyen TV. Laparoscopic entry: a literature review and analysis of techniques and complications of primary port entry. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;42(3):246-54.
Perino A, Cucinella G, Venezia R, Castelli A, Cittadini E. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: an assessment of the learning curve in a prospective randomized study. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:2996-9.
Walid M, Heaton RL. Laparoscopy-to-laparotomy quotient in obstetrics and gynecology residency programs. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;283:1027-31.
Leonard F, Lecuru F, Rizk E, Chasset S, Robin F, Taurelle R. Perioperative morbidity of gynecological laparoscopy. A prospective monocenter observational study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000;79:129-34.
Jansen FW, Kapiteyn K, Trimbos-Kemper T, Hermans J, Trimbos JB. Complications of laparoscopy: a prospective multicentre observational study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;104(5):595-600.
Sirén P, Kurki T. A nationwide analysis of laparoscopic complications. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:108-12.
Aiwen Le X, Jinyuan C. Identifying risk factors for complications in gynecologic laparoscopic surgery: a retrospective study. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2023;50(12):262.
Patel R, Moray A. Intraoperative complications after total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a retrospective study in training institute. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2019;8:835-9.
Marín JM, Cuesta MC, Martínez-Etayo M, Arina R, Lete I. Resultados de 1000 cirugías ginecolo´gicas laparosco´picas sucesivas. Prog Obstet Ginecol. 2013;56:4-8.
Marín JM, Cuesta MC, Martínez-Etayo M, Arina R, Lete I. Resultados de 1000 cirugías ginecolo´gicas laparosco´picas sucesivas. Prog Obstet Ginecol. 2013;56:4-8.
Kyung MS, Choi JS, Lee JH, Jung US, Lee KW. Laparoscopic management of complications in gynecologic laparoscopic surgery: a 5-year experience in a single center. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15(6):689-94.
Härkki-Sirén P, Kurki T. A nationwide analysis of laparoscopic complications. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:108-12
Song T, Kim TJ, Kang H, Lee YY, Choi CH, Lee JW, et al. A review of the technique and complications from 2,012 cases of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy at a single institution. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;51(3):239-43.
Kumakiri J, Kikuchi I, Kitade M, Kuroda K, Matsuoka S, Tokita S, et al. Incidence of complications during gynecologic laparoscopic surgery in patients after previous laparotomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010;17(4):480-6.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
