Compare use of subcutaneous drain vs. no drain in obese women to reduce wound complications post caesarean section: a randomized control trial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20254290Keywords:
Caesarean section, Obesity, Subcutaneous drain, Surgical site infection, Seroma, Wound complicationsAbstract
Background: Wound complications such as infection, seroma and dehiscence are more common in obese women after caesarean section. The use of subcutaneous drains has been proposed to minimize postoperative complication. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of subcutaneous drains in reducing wound complications among obese women undergoing caesarean section.
Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at Government Medical College, Akola, over 18 months. A total of 150 obese women undergoing caesarean section were randomized into two groups: Group A (with subcutaneous drain) and Group B (without drain). Both groups were comparable in age, parity, BMI and haemoglobin levels. Postoperative complications were assessed, along with duration of hospital stay and time to suture removal.
Results: Women without drains experienced significantly higher wound complications: superficial infection (17.5% vs 7.14%, p<0.05), deep infection (12.5% vs 4.29%, p<0.05) and seroma formation (27.5% vs 7.14%, p<0.001). Wound gape (20% vs 10%) and postoperative fever (15% vs 5.71%) were also more common in the no-drain group. Mean hospital stay and suture removal time were significantly shorter in the drain group (p<0.001).
Conclusions: Subcutaneous drain placement after caesarean section in obese women significantly reduces wound infection, seroma formation and postoperative morbidity, leading to faster recovery and shorter hospital stays. Routine use of drains may be beneficial in this high-risk population.
References
Anderson DJ, Podgorny K, Berríos-Torres SI, Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Greene L, et al. Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014;35(6):605-27.
Al-Kharabsheh R, Ahmad M, Al Soudi M, Al-Ramadneh A. Wound Infection Incidence and Obesity in Elective Cesarean Sections in Jordan. Med Arch. 2021;75(2):138-43.
WHO. Global trends in cesarean delivery. World Health Organization Report. 2022.
Chu SY, Kim SY, Schmid CH, Dietz PM, Callaghan WM, Lau J, et al. Maternal obesity and risk of cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2007;8(5):385-94.
Kvalvik SA, Rasmussen S, Thornhill HF, Baghestan E. Risk factors for surgical site infection following cesarean delivery: A hospital-based case-control study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021;100(12):2167-75.
Martin EK, Beckmann MM, Barnsbee LN, Halton KA, Merollini K, Graves N. Best practice perioperative strategies and surgical techniques for preventing caesarean section surgical site infections: a systematic review of reviews and meta-analyses. BJOG. 2018;125(8):956-64.
Gomez-Lopez N, Galaz J, Miller D, Farias-Jofre M, Liu Z, Arenas-Hernandez M, et al. The immunobiology of preterm labor and birth: intra-amniotic inflammation or breakdown of maternal-fetal homeostasis. Reproduction. 2022;164(2):11-45.
Cardosi RJ, Drake J, Holmes S, Tebes SJ, Hoffman MS, Fiorica JV, et al. Subcutaneous management of vertical incisions with 3 or more centimeters of subcutaneous fat. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(2):607-14.
Hellums EK, Lin MG, Ramsey PS. Prophylactic subcutaneous drainage for prevention of wound complications after cesarean delivery--a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(3):229-35.
Steiner HL, Strand EA. Surgical-site infection in gynecologic surgery: pathophysiology and prevention. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(2):121-8.
Naumann RW, Hauth JC, Owen J, Hodgkins PM, Lincoln T. Subcutaneous tissue approximation in relation to wound disruption after cesarean delivery in obese women. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;85(3):412-6.
Vermillion ST, Lamoutte C, Soper DE, Verdeja A. Wound infection after cesarean: effect of subcutaneous tissue thickness. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95(1):923-6.
Gould D. Caesarean section, surgical site infection and wound management. Nurs Stand. 2007;21(32):60-2.
Fitzwater JL, Tita AT. Prevention and management of cesarean wound infection. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2014;41(4):671-89.
Magann EF, Chauhan SP, Rodts-Palenik S, Bufkin L, Martin JN Jr, Morrison JC. Subcutaneous stitch closure versus subcutaneous drain to prevent wound disruption after cesarean delivery: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(6):1119-23.
Alanis MC, Villers MS, Law TL, Steadman EM, Robinson CJ. Complications of cesarean delivery in the massively obese parturient. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(3):271-7.
Temming LA, Raghuraman N, Carter EB, Stout MJ, Rampersad RM, Macones GA, et al. Impact of evidence-based interventions on wound complications after cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(4):449.
Zuarez-Easton S, Zafran N, Garmi G, Salim R. Postcesarean wound infection: prevalence, impact, prevention and management challenges. Int J Women Health. 2017;9:81-8.
Jatin CP, Beniwal SS, Pithalla LB, Dwivedi A, Shetty VR, Desai A. Managing obstetric and gynecologic complications in obese women: Evidence-Based Strategies for Optimizing Outcomes and Reducing Risks. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025;21;87(6):3586-95.
Gillispie-Bell V. Prevention of surgical site infections in gynecologic surgery: a review of risk factors and recommendations. Ochsner J. 2020;20(4):434-8.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
