Study of hysteroscopic evaluation in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding


  • Ashok Kumar K. Department of Obstestrics and Gynecology, ESIC MC PGIMSR Rajainagar, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
  • Sathya P. Department of Obstestrics and Gynecology, ESIC MC PGIMSR Rajainagar, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
  • Sreelatha Sampathkumar Department of Obstestrics and Gynecology, ESIC MC PGIMSR Rajainagar, Bangalore, Karnataka, India



Abnormal uterine bleeding, Histopathological examination, Hysteroscopy


Background: Abnormal uterine bleeding in women is the commonest presenting complaint which accounts for one third of all gynecological consultations. It not only causes discomfort, inconvenience to healthy women but also affects their quality of life and impose financial burden on them. This insists the physician to diagnose its etiology and provide appropriate treatment. Hysteroscopy guided biopsy is a simple, safe, reliable procedure in the diagnosis of abnormal uterine bleeding. The objective of the study was to evaluate the uterine pathology in premenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding by hysteroscopy.

Methods: This prospective study was conducted at ESIC-MC and PGIMSR, Rajajinagar, Bangalore, in 50 premenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding over 18 months from Dec 2012 to May 2014. All 50 women were subjected to diagnostic hysteroscopy followed by curettage. The sample was sent to histopathological examination. Data was collected and analyzed.

Results: In the present study, abnormal uterine bleeding was more common in 41-45yrs of age. The commonest presenting complaint was heavy menstrual bleeding (menorrhagia) in 54% of cases. The abnormal findings on hysteroscopy were: Hyperplasia 42%, endometrial polyp 22%, sub-mucous myoma 4%, carcinoma endometrium 2%, synechiae 2% and endometritis 2%. Negative hysteroscopic view was seen in 26%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of hysteroscopy was 91.89%, 92.31%, 97.14% and 80% respectively. The overall diagnostic accuracy of hysteroscopy was 92%.

Conclusions: Hysteroscopy and its directed biopsy renders high diagnostic accuracy in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding and thereby guiding them for further management.

Author Biography

Sathya P., Department of Obstestrics and Gynecology, ESIC MC PGIMSR Rajainagar, Bangalore, Karnataka, India

Department of obg and an Associate Professor and first author of the article


Lasmar RB, Dias R, Barrozo PRM, Oliveira MAP, Coutinho EDSF, da Rosa DB. Prevalence of hysteroscopic findings and histologic diagnoses in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:1803-7.

Schorge JO, Schaffer JI, Halvorson LM, Hoffman BL, Bradshaw KD, Cunningham FG, (eds). Publisher Mc Graw Hill; 2008:950-53.

Sweet MG, Schmidt-Dalton TA, Weiss PM MK. Evaluation and Management of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding in Premenopausal Women. Am Fam Physician. 2012;85:35-43.

Kotdawala P, Kotdawala S, Nagar N. Evaluation of endometrium in peri-menopausal abnormal uterine bleeding. J Midlife Health. 2013;4:16-21.

Stock RJ, Kanbour A. Prehysterectomy curettage. Obstet. 1975;45:537-41.

John A Rock, Howard W. Jones III (eds). New Delhi: Wolters Kluwer health and Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2009;336-68.

Pasqualotto EB, Margossian H, Price LL. Accuracy of preoperative diagnostic tools and outcomes of hysteroscopic management of menstrual dysfunction. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2000;7:201-9.

Van Dongen H, de Kroon CD, Jacobi CE, Trimbos JB, Jansen FW. Diagnostic hysteroscopy in abnormal uterine bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2007;114:664-75.

Valle RE. Hysteroscopic evaluation of patients with abnormal uterine Bleeding. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1981;153:521-23.

Patil SG, Bhute SB, Inamdar SA, Acharya NS, Shrivastava DS. Role of Diagnostic Hysteroscopy in Abnormal Uterine Bleeding and its Histopathologic Correlation. J Gynecol Endosc Surg. 2009;1:98-104.

Panda A, Parulekar SV, Gupta A. Diagnostic hysteroscopy in abnormal uterine bleeding and histopathological correlation. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 1999;49:74-6.

Guin G, Sandhu SK, Lele A, Khare S. Hysteroscopy in evaluation of abnormal uterine bleeding. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2011;61:546-9.

Hong-lan ZHU, Xu-dong L, Jian-liu W, Heng CUI, Li-hui WEI. Hysteroscopy and directed biopsy in the diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma. Chin Med J. 2010;123:3524-8.

Stefanescu A, Marinescu B. Diagnostic Hysteroscopy - A Retrospective Study of 1545 Cases. maedica a J Clin Med. 2012;7:309-14.

Sheth S, Hamper VM, Kurman R. A study between hysteroscopy with directed biopsies and dialatation and curettage. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;158:489.

Gianninoto A, Morana C, Campione C. Diagnostic hysteroscopy in abnormal uterine bleeding. Five years’ experience. Minerva Ginecol. 200355:57-61.

Trajkovic Dinic SP. Role of Hysteroscopy in Evaluation of Patients with Abnormal Uterine Bleeding. Acta Facultatis Medicae Naissensis. 2011;28:177-81.

De Wit AC, Vleugels MP, de Kruif JH. Diagnostic hysteroscopy: a valuable diagnostic tool in the diagnosis of structural intra-cavital pathology and endometrial hyperplasia or carcinoma? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003;110:79-82.

Loverro G, Bettocchi S, Cormio G, Nicolardi V, Porreca MR, Pansini N et al. Diagnostic accuracy of hysteroscopy in endometrial hyperplasia, Maturitas. 1996;25:187-91.

Fernández-Parra J, Rodríguez Oliver A, López Criado S, Parrilla Fernández F, Montoya Ventoso F. Hysteroscopic evaluation of endometrial polyps. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006;95:144-8.

Uno LH, Carvalho FM, Bagnoli VR, Fonsecaa AM, Pinotti JA. Morphologic hysteroscopic criteria suggestive of endometrial hyperplasia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1995;49:35-40.

Birinyi L, Darago’ P, Torok P, Csisza’r P, Major T, Borsos a, et al. Predictive value of hysteroscopic examination in intrauterine abnormalities. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004;115:75-9.






Original Research Articles