A study to assess the role of modified biophysical profile in prediction of perinatal outcome in high-risk pregnancy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20254286Keywords:
High-risk pregnancy, Modified biophysical profile, MBPP, Non-stress test, Amniotic fluid index, Fetal distress, NICU admission, Fetal surveillance, Perinatal outcomeAbstract
Background: High-risk pregnancies are associated with increased maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality, particularly in resource-limited settings. Effective antenatal surveillance is critical for improving outcomes, and the Modified Biophysical Profile (MBPP) has emerged as a practical tool due to its simplicity and reliability. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic value of MBPP in predicting adverse perinatal outcomes in high-risk pregnancies and to use it a primary surveillance tool.
Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted at SMS Medical College, Jaipur, from July 2023, involving 200 high-risk pregnant women (≥32 weeks gestation). MBPP, comprising non-stress test (NST) and amniotic fluid index (AFI), was used to monitor fetal well-being. Outcomes such as mode of delivery, APGAR scores, NICU admissions, and neonatal complications were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the predictive performance of MBPP, NST, and AFI.
Results: Out of the 200 cases, 63% underwent caesarean delivery. Abnormal MBPP was observed in 54% of cases and was significantly associated with fetal distress, NICU admissions, and low APGAR scores. MBPP showed high sensitivity and accuracy in predicting adverse outcomes, outperforming AFI and being comparable to NST. Anemia (26%), previous caesarean (20%), and oligohydramnios (18.5%) were the most common risk factors. Respiratory distress (45.5%) was the leading cause of NICU admission.
Conclusions: MBPP is a reliable, non-invasive, and cost-effective screening method for high-risk pregnancies, aiding in early detection of fetal compromise and timely intervention to improve perinatal outcomes.
Metrics
References
Rutherford SK, Phelan JP, Smith CV, Jacob N. The four-quadrant assessment of AFV: an adjunct to antepartum foetal heart rate testing. Obstet Gynecol. 1987;70:353-6.
Rutherford SK, Phelan JP, Smith CV, Jacob N. The fourquadrant assessment of AFV: an adjunct to antepartum foetal heart rate testing. Obstet Gynecol. 1987;70:353-6.
O'neill E, Thorp J. Antepartum evaluation of the fetus and fetal well being. Clin Obstetr Gynecol. 2012;55(3):722. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/GRF.0b013e318253b318
Raparthy S, Sunitha C. Study of oligohydramnios cases by modified biophysical profile and their perinatal outcome. J Med and Dental Sci. 2014;13(9):62-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9790/0853-13976269
Sankar MJ, Neogi SB, Sharma J, Chauhan M, Srivastava R, Prabhakar PK, et al. State of newborn health in India. Indian J Perinatol. 2016;36:3-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2016.183
Arya TS, Thapa R. Prediction of fetal outcome in high-risk pregnancy with modified biophysical profile. MedPulse Int J Gynaecol. 2017;3(1):50-3.
Anupama MS, Dwarakanath L, Anand SH. Rapid vs conventional biophysical profile in predicting perinatal outcome. Int J Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2021;5(4):297-300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33545/gynae.2021.v5.i4e.1002
Ain NQ, Rehman Z, Garg M. Modified biophysical profile in normal pregnancies and oligohydramnios. Int J Sci Stud. 2021;8(10):47-56.
Jahan K, Umeshchandra S, Meenakshi D. Modified biophysical profile after 34 weeks gestation. J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2024;31(11):365-73.
Fernandes ET, Mudanur SR. Modified biophysical profile vs Doppler in high-risk pregnancies. Int J Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2023;7(3):392-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33545/gynae.2023.v7.i3c.1341
Anjum G, Mittal H, Chauhan N. Modified biophysical profile and perinatal outcome in high-risk pregnancies. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2021;10:3357-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20213449
Gonzalez JM, Stamilio DM, Ural S. Abnormal fetal testing and perinatal outcomes in IUGR. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196:48-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2007.01.010
Shalini M, Kaskurthi V, Prathyusha V. Modified biophysical profile in predicting perinatal outcome. Int J Acad Med Pharm. 2023;5(1):196-203.
Maurya A, Kushwah V. Modified biophysical profile and fetal outcome in high risk pregnancy. Heart Dis. 2014;3:2-72.
Sonia H, Bhavya HU, Doppa G. Modified biophysical profile and Doppler in low-risk term pregnancies. J South Asian Fed Obstet Gynaecol. 2022;14(2):1.