An ultrasound study of foetal head-perineum distance in term pregnant women to estimate successful vaginal delivery

Mala Vijayakrishnan; Navina Nathan

doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20254292

Authors

Mala Vijayakrishnan Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vijaya hospitals, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
Navina Nathan Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vijaya hospitals, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20254292

Keywords:

Estimating mode of delivery, Fetal head-perineum distance, Transperineal ultrasound

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study is to find the role of foetal head-perineum distance in term primiparous pregnant women being induced, in estimating successful vaginal delivery using transperineal ultrasound. And further to compare fetal head-perineum distance with cervical length and Bishop score. Cervical length and Bishop score were already established as good predictors of vaginal delivery.

Methods: An ultrasound machine with transabdominal and transvaginal probe was used in the study. In this study spanning from December 2023 to October 2024; 63 primiparous term pregnant women were recruited from Vijaya hospital, Chennai after getting approval from the Institutional Ethical Committee. 63 primiparous patients who underwent induction of labour for various reasons were selected for the study and examined. Patients undergoing elective induction of labour at term gestation were assessed for the fetal head-perineum distance (FHPD) by transperineal ultrasound and cervical length by transvaginal ultrasonography. Bishop score was assessed digitally. After induction of labour, patient undergoing vaginal delivery and caesarean sections were noted down.

Results: Forty-two patients delivered vaginally. Twenty-one patients delivered by LSCS. Fetal head-perineum distance cut-off in my study was 5.5 cm. Cervical length cut-off was 3cm. Patients having favorable bishop score of 5 and above delivered vaginally.

Conclusions: Trans perineal fetal-head perineum distance measured by ultrasound can be used as an important tool to predict vaginal delivery before induction of labour.

References

Garcia‐Simon R, Oros D, Gracia‐Cólera D, Moreno E, Paules C, Cañizares S, et al. Cervix assessment for the management of labor induction: Reliability of cervical length and Bishop score determined by residents. J Obstetr Gynaecol Res. 2015;41(3):377-82.

Gurung P, Malla S, Lama S, Malla A, Singh A. Caesarean section during second stage of labor in a tertiary centre. J Nepal Health Res Council. 2017;15(2):178-81.

Bajpai N, Bhakta R, Kumar P, Rai L, Hebbar S. Manipal cervical scoring system by transvaginal ultrasound in predicting successful labour induction. JCDR. 2015;9(5):QC04.

Dückelmann AM, Bamberg C, Michaelis SA, Lange J, Nonnenmacher A, Dudenhausen JW, et al. Measurement of fetal head descent using the ‘angle of progression ‘on transperineal ultrasound. The Official J Int Soci Ultrasound Obstetr Gynecol. 2010;35(2):216-22.

Ahn KH, Oh MJ. Intrapartum ultrasound: A useful method for evaluating labor progress and predicting operative vaginal delivery. Obstetr Gynecol Sci. 2014;57(6):427-35.

Wiafe YA, Whitehead B, Venables H, Nakua EK. The effectiveness of intrapartum ultrasonography in assessing cervical dilatation, head station and position: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound. 2016;24(4):222-32.

Hassan WA, Eggebø TM, Ferguson M, Lees C. Simple two‐dimensional ultrasound technique to assess intrapartum cervical dilatation: a pilot study. Ultrasound Obstetr Gynecol. 2013;41(4):413-8.

Eggebø TM, Gjessing LK, Heien C, Smedvig E, Økland I, Romundstad P, et al. Prediction of labor and delivery by transperineal ultrasound in pregnancies with prelabor rupture of membranes at term. J Int Soci Ultrasound Obstetr Gynecol. 2006;27(4):387-91.

Eggebø TM, Hassan WA, Salvesen KÅ, Lindtjørn E, Lees CC. Sonographic prediction of vaginal delivery in prolonged labor: a two‐center study. Ultrasound Obstetr Gynecol. 2014;43(2):195-201.

Akmal S, Kametas N, Tsoi E, Hargreaves C, Nicolaides KH. Comparison of transvaginal digital examination with intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position before instrumental delivery. J Int Soci Ultrasound Obstetr Gynecol. 2003;21(5):437-40.

Usman S, Wilkinson M, Barton H, Lees CC. The feasibility and accuracy of ultrasound assessment in the labor room. J Maternal-Fetal Neonat Medi. 2019;32(20):3442-51.

Hassan WA, Eggebø T, Ferguson M, Gillett A, Studd J, Pasupathy D, et al. The sonopartogram: a novel method for recording progress of labor by ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstetr Gynecol. 2014;43(2):189-94.

Murphy DJ, Strachan BK, Bahl R, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Assisted vaginal birth: green‐top guideline no. 26. BJOG: Int J Obstetr Gynaecol. 2020;127(9):e70-112.

Bishop EH. Pelvic scoring for elective induction (Doctoral dissertation). Obstet Gynecol. 1964;24:266- 8.

Galzie SK, Rao SB. Cervical effacement, as an independent parameter versus modified bishop score, for predicting the favorability of vaginal delivery in a primigravida at 40 weeks gestation and beyond. Int J Reproduct Contracept Obstetr Gynecol. 2020;9(5):1831-8.

Lynch CM, Sexton DJ, Hession M, Morrison JJ. Obesity and mode of delivery in primigravid and multigravid women. Am J Perinatol. 2008;25(03):163-7.

Vogel JP, Souza JP, Gu¨lmezoglu AM. Patterns and outcomes of induction of labour in Africa and Asia: a secondary analysis of the WHO global survey on maternal and neonatal health. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(6):e65612.

Torkildsen EA, Salvesen KA, Eggebø TM. Prediction of delivery mode with transperineal ultrasound in women with prolonged first stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37(6):702-8.

Ali MS, Abdelhafeez MA, Medhat A. The distance from maternal perineum to fetal head distance as a predictive of successful induction of labor. Nat Sci. 2013;11:19-24.

Saroyo YB, Danarti MD. Prediction of vaginal deliveries using fetal head descent assessed by transperineal ultrasound. In J Physics: Conference Series. 2018;1073(2):022016).

Kasbaoui S, Séverac F, Aïssi G, Gaudineau A, Lecointre L, Akladios C, et al. Predicting the difficulty of operative vaginal delivery by ultrasound measurement of fetal head station. Am J Obstetr Gynecol. 2017;216(5):507-e1.

Ali J, Hebbar S. Ultrasound assessment of foetal Head–Perineum distance prior to induction of labour as a predictor of successful vaginal delivery. J Obstetr Gynecol India. 2019;69(2):129-35.

Eser A, Köşüş A, Köşüş N. Intrapartum ultrasonography for prediction of vaginal delivery. Turkiye Klinikleri J Gynecol Obst. 2016;26(3):146-51.

Dückelmann AM, Bamberg C, Michaelis SA, Lange J, Nonnenmacher A, Dudenhausen JW, et al. Measurement of fetal head descent using the ‘angle of progression’on transperineal ultrasound imaging is reliable regardless of fetal head station or ultrasound expertise. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology: J Int Soci Ultrasound Obstetr Gynecol. 2010;35(2):216-22.

Usman S, Hanidu A, Kovalenko M, Hassan WA, Lees C. Expert Review The sonopartogram. Am J Obstetr Gynecol. 2022:1-20.