Comparative study between three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound and hysteroscopy in evaluating uterine abnormalities among infertile women

Authors

  • Kaavya Sathyamurthy Institute of Reproductive Medicine and Women’s Health, Madras Medical Mission Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • K. M. Kundavi Shankar Institute of Reproductive Medicine and Women’s Health, Madras Medical Mission Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • V. Geetha Institute of Reproductive Medicine and Women’s Health, Madras Medical Mission Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • G. V. Rashmi Institute of Reproductive Medicine and Women’s Health, Madras Medical Mission Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Geovin Ranji Institute of Reproductive Medicine and Women’s Health, Madras Medical Mission Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20260874

Keywords:

Hysteroscopy, Three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound, Diagnostic accuracy, Infertility, Uterine cavity abnormalities

Abstract

Background: Objectives were to assess the diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound (3D TVUS) compared to hysteroscopy in detecting uterine cavity abnormalities in infertile women.

Methods: This prospective study included 67 infertile women who underwent both 3D TVUS and hysteroscopy. The findings from both modalities were compared to evaluate their concordance and diagnostic performance.

Results: Of the 67 patients, 29 (43.3%) exhibited a normal uterine cavity on both 3D TVUS and hysteroscopy. Among the 38 patients with uterine abnormalities, the distribution was as follows: polypoidal endometrium: 3 patients, submucosal fibroids: 9 patients, endometrial polyps: 15 patients, uterine septum: 6 patients, intrauterine adhesions: 3 patients and endometrial hyperplasia: 2 patients. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 3D TVUS for detecting uterine abnormalities were calculated, with hysteroscopy serving as the gold standard.

Conclusions: 3D TVUS demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy in detecting uterine cavity abnormalities and showed substantial agreement with hysteroscopy findings. Given its non-invasive nature, 3D TVUS can be considered a reliable initial screening tool for evaluating uterine abnormalities in infertile women.

References

Yatsenko SA, Rajkovic A. Genetics of human female infertility. Biol Reprod. 2019;101(3):549-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biolre/ioz084

Moore JF, Carugno J. Hysteroscopy. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. 2025.

Kerr NK, Dunham R, Wolstenhulme S, Wilson J. Comparison of two-and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound in the visualisation of intrauterine devices. Ultrasound. 2014;22(3):141-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1742271X14532082

Apirakviriya C, Rungruxsirivorn T, Phupong V, Wisawasukmongchol W. Diagnostic accuracy of 3D-transvaginal ultrasound in detecting uterine cavity abnormalities in infertile patients as compared with hysteroscopy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;200:24-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.01.023

Tlais M, Hamze H, Hteit A, Haddad K, El Fassih I, Zalzali I, et al. Advances in ultrasound-based imaging for diagnosis of endometrial cancer. World J Radiol. 2025;17(9):111493. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v17.i9.111493

Loiacono RMR, Trojano G, Gaudio ND, Kardhashi A, Deliso MA, Falco G, et al. Hysteroscopy as a Valid Tool for Endometrial Pathology in Patients with Postmenopausal Bleeding or Asymptomatic Patients with a Thickened Endometrium: Hysteroscopic and Histological Results. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2015;79(3):210-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000371758

Naredi N, Sharma R, Gurmeet P. Can Three-Dimensional Transvaginal Sonography Replace Office Hysteroscopy in Detecting Uterine Abnormalities in Infertility Patients? J Human Reproduct Sci. 2021;14:392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_97_21

Pleş L, Cătălina A, Ionescu CA, Arvătescu CA, Vladareanu S, Moga MA. Three-dimensional scan of the uterine cavity of infertile women before assisted reproductive technology use. Medicine. 2018;97(41):e12764. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012764

Ebrashy A, Marzouk AA. Three-dimensional ultrasonography in the evaluation of the uterine cavity. Middle East Fertil Society J. 2007;12:41-6.

Mohammadi S, Hosseini R, Eslami B, Ahmadi F. Accuracy of 3-Dimensional Sonography for Diagnosis and Classification of Congenital Uterine Anomalies. J Ultrasound Med. 2013;32:923-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.32.6.923

Pozzati F, Catena U, Rizzi A, Zorzi M, Bonetti E, Testa AC. Genital Tract Anomalies: an Ultrasound Perspective. In The Continuous Textbook of Women’s Medicine, Ultrasound in gynecology Vol 10. Glob Libr Women’s Med. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3843/GLOWM.419593

Ghi T, Casadio P, Kuleva M, Perrone AM, Savelli L, Giunchi S, et al. Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound in diagnosis and classification of congenital uterine anomalies. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(2):808-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.05.086

Shetty A, Dalal A, Manwani S. Sensitivity of ultrasound scan and hysteroscopy with histopathological correlation in identifying endometrial pathology for a mixed group of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2023;12:1309-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20231215

Kim MJ, Lee Y, Lee C, Chun S, Kim A, Kim HY, et al. Accuracy of three dimensional ultrasound and treatment outcomes of intrauterine adhesion in infertile women. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;54(6):737-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2015.10.011

Burjoo A, Zhao X, Zou L, Liu X, Lei L, Zhang B, et al. The role of preoperative 3D-ultrasound in intraoperative judgement for hysteroscopic adhesiolysis. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8(4):55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2020.01.06

Brown SE, Coddingion CC, Schnorr J, Toner J, Gibbons W, Oehninger S. Evaluation of outpatient hysteroscopy, saline Infusion hysterosonography and hysterosalpingography in Infertile women. A prospective randomized study. Fertil Steril. 2000;74(5):1029-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(00)01541-7

Louis F, Lulla CP. Hysteroscopy is Superior to 3D Ultrasound in Gynecological Diagnosis. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2020;70(6):447-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-020-01384-8

Jiang X, Chen X, Li J, Wang W, Li J. Clinical application of three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of intrauterine adhesions. J Int Med Res. 2021;49(11):3000605211024520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605211024520

Sharma S, Sharma A. To compare the diagnostic accuracy of hysteroscopy with transvaginal sonography in detection of endometrial polyp and endometrial hyperplasia in peri and postmenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding. Indian J Obstet Gynecol Res. 2020;7(4):498-503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijogr.2020.107

Niknejadi M, Haghighi H, Ahmadi F, Niknejad F, Chehrazi M. Diagnostic Accuracy of Transvaginal Sonography in the Detection of Uterine Abnormalities in Infertile Women. I J Radiol. 2012;9(3):e79461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.8063

Ahmadi F, Haghighi H, Ghahremani Z, Niknejad F, Akhbari F, Ramezanali F, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Three-dimensional Ultrasonography in Detection of Endometrial Lesions compared with Hysteroscopy in Infertile Women. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;10(4):393-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1490

Downloads

Published

2026-03-27

How to Cite

Sathyamurthy, K., Kundavi Shankar, K. M., Geetha, V., Rashmi, G. V., & Ranji, G. (2026). Comparative study between three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound and hysteroscopy in evaluating uterine abnormalities among infertile women. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 15(4), 1205–1210. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20260874

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles