Challenging the surgical norm-medical management of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: a case report

Authors

  • Preeti Kanal Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, MLB Medical College, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Shivani Samaiya Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, MLB Medical College, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20254312

Keywords:

Cesarean scar pregnancy, Ectopic pregnancy, Medical management, Methotrexate, β-hCG

Abstract

Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a rare form of ectopic pregnancy in which implantation occurs within the myometrial defect of a previous cesarean section scar. Its incidence is rising in parallel with increasing cesarean delivery rates. Although surgical management is traditionally preferred to prevent complications such as uterine rupture and morbidly adherent placenta, selected cases may be effectively managed medically. We report the successful medical management of a 34-year-old G3P2L1 woman with two prior cesarean deliveries who presented with mild abdominal discomfort and bleeding per vaginum after a 14-day delayed menstrual cycle. Her serum β-hCG was >15,000 mIU/mL. Transvaginal ultrasonography revealed a gestational sac measuring ~11.6 mm located within the anterior myometrium at the previous cesarean scar, containing a yolk sac and fetal pole with cardiac activity, consistent with a live CSP. The patient wanted uterine-preserving medical management. This case demonstrates that even a live CSP can be successfully managed using a combined local-systemic medical approach, preserving menstrual function, uterine integrity and fertility. With cesarean rates rising globally, evidence supporting safe, effective, non-surgical alternatives is increasingly important. The patient was followed up with β-hCG levels.

 

References

Rotas MA, HabermanS, Levgur M. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(6):1373-81.

Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Santos R, Tanya T, Grace P, Alan AA. The diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of caesarean scar pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207(1):44.e1.

Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Cali G, Vintzileos A, Viscarello R, Al-Khan A, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy is a precursor of morbidly adherent placenta. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;44(3):346.

Maheux-Lacroix S, Li F, Bujold E, Nesbitt-Hawes E, Deans R, Abbott J. Cesarean scar pregnancies: a systematic review of treatment options. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017;24(6):915.

Jurkovic D, Hillaby K, Woelfer B, Lawrence A, Salim R, Elson CJ. First-trimester diagnosis and management of pregnancies implanted into the lower uterine segment cesarean section scar. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21(3):220-7.

Ash A, Smith A, Maxwell D. Caesarean scar pregnancy. BJOG. 2007;114(3):253-63.

Wang CJ, Chao AS, Yuen LT, Wang CW, Soong YK, Lee CL. Endoscopic management of cesarean scar pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(2):494.e1-4.

Birch Petersen K, Hoffmann E, Rifbjerg Larsen C, Svarre Nielsen H. Cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review of treatment studies. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(4):958-67.

Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM). SMFM Consult Series #63: Cesarean scar pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;227(2):B2-14.

Seow KM, Huang LW, Lin YH, Lin MY, Tsai YL, Hwang JL. Cesarean scar pregnancy: issues in management. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23(3):247-53.

Zhang Y, Gu Y, Wang JM, Li Y. Analysis of risk factors for cesarean scar pregnancy. Chin Med J (Engl). 2013;126(23):4520-5.

Cali G, Timor-Tritsch IE, Palacios-Jaraquemada J. Outcome of cesarean scar pregnancy managed expectantly: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51(2):169-75.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-29

How to Cite

Kanal, P., & Samaiya, S. (2025). Challenging the surgical norm-medical management of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: a case report. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 15(1), 352–355. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20254312

Issue

Section

Case Reports