Endometrial preparation with stimulated versus artificial cycle: a comparative study on frozen embryo transfer outcomes

Sangeeta Sharma; Y. Himabindu; Kiramai Dondhu; Reha Rakholia; Shweta Sinha; Swapnil; Ambika Dubey

doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20254295

Authors

Sangeeta Sharma Department of Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, GSL Medical College and General Hospital, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh, India
Y. Himabindu Department of Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, GSL Medical College and General Hospital, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh, India
Kiramai Dondhu Department of Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, GSL Medical College and General Hospital, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh, India
Reha Rakholia Department of Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, GSL Medical College and General Hospital, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh, India
Shweta Sinha Department of Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, GSL Medical College and General Hospital, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh, India
Swapnil Department of Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, GSL Medical College and General Hospital, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh, India
Ambika Dubey Department of Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, GSL Medical College and General Hospital, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20254295

Keywords:

Artificial cycle, Endometrial preparation, Frozen embryo transfer, Pregnancy outcomes, Stimulated cycle

Abstract

Background: Successful frozen–thawed embryo transfer (FET) depends on adequate endometrial preparation. Stimulated cycles (SC) may provide a more physiological hormonal milieu by supporting corpus luteum function, whereas artificial cycles (AC) offer flexible scheduling but rely entirely on exogenous hormones. Existing evidence comparing these two approaches remains inconsistent. This study aimed to evaluate reproductive outcomes following FET using stimulated versus artificial cycles.

Methods: This prospective comparative study included 89 women undergoing their first FET between January 2024 and April 2025. Participants were prepared using either a stimulated cycle (n=31) involving letrozole with low-dose gonadotropins or an artificial cycle (n=58) using estrogen–progesterone replacement. Endometrial thickness was monitored and two good-quality day-3 embryos were transferred after adequate progesterone exposure. Outcomes assessed were positive pregnancy test, clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy at 12 weeks and early pregnancy loss. Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t-test, Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, with p<0.05 considered significant.

Results: Baseline characteristics including age, BMI, infertility duration and ovarian reserve were comparable between groups. Pregnancy outcomes were higher in the SC group but did not reach statistical significance: positive pregnancy rate (41.9% vs. 31.0%, p=0.32), clinical pregnancy rate (32.3% vs. 24.1%, p=0.41) and ongoing pregnancy rate (29.0% vs. 19.0%, p=0.27). Early pregnancy loss remained low in both groups (3.2% vs. 5.2%, p=1.00).

Conclusions: Stimulated cycles showed a trend toward improved pregnancy outcomes compared with artificial cycles; however, differences were not statistically significant. Both protocols yielded acceptable clinical results, supporting individualized selection of endometrial preparation based on patient characteristics and clinical judgment.

References

Romero Singh B, Reschke L, Segars J, Baker VL. Frozen-thawed embryo transfer: the potential importance of the corpus luteum in preventing obstetrical complications. Fertil Steril. 2020;113(2):252–7.

Roelens C, Blockeel C. Cycle management in frozen embryo transfer: the best of all worlds. Reprod Biomed. 2025;1;50(4):104789.

Dieamant FC, Petersen CG, Mauri AL, Comar V, Mattila M, Vagnini LD, et al. Fresh embryos versus freeze-all embryos-transfer strategies: Nuances of a meta-analysis. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2017;21(3):260–72.

Lee JC, Badell ML, Kawwass JF. The impact of endometrial preparation for frozen embryo transfer on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2022;20:40.

Mensing L, Dahlberg ES, Bay B, Gabrielsen A, Knudsen UB. Endometrial preparation methods prior to frozen embryo transfer: A retrospective cohort study comparing true natural cycle, modified natural cycle and artificial cycle. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022;306(4):1381–8.

Hsueh YW, Huang CC, Hung SW, Chang CW, Hsu HC, Yang TC, et al. Finding of the optimal preparation and timing of endometrium in frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a literature review of clinical evidence. Front Endocrinol. 2023;14:1250847.

Pohjonen EM, Huhtala H, Erkinaro T, Lehto J, Pellas E, Vilmi-Kerälä T, et al. Risk assessment of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and other adverse pregnancy outcomes after frozen embryo transfers following an artificial cycle: A retrospective cohort study. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2024;167(2):648–55.

Ozgur K, Tore H, Berkkanoglu M, Bulut H, Donmez L, Coetzee K. Comparable ongoing pregnancy and pregnancy loss rates in natural cycle and artificial cycle frozen embryo transfers with intensive method-specific luteal phase support: a retrospective cohort study. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2024;53(7):102797.

Konc J, Kanyo K, Varga E, Kriston R, Cseh S. The effect of cycle regimen used for endometrium preparation on the outcome of day 3 frozen embryo transfer cycle. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(2):767–8.

Yu J, Ma Y, Wu Z, Li Y, Tang L, Li Y, et al. Endometrial preparation protocol of the frozen-thawed embryo transfer in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;291(1):201–11.

Conrad KP, Benyo DF. Placental cytokines and the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1997;37(3):240–9.

von Versen-Höynck F, Narasimhan P, Selamet Tierney ES, Martinez N, Conrad KP, Baker VL, et al. Absent or excessive corpus luteum number is associated with altered maternal vascular health in early pregnancy. Hypertension. 2019;73(3):680–90.

Ginström Ernstad E, Wennerholm UB, Khatibi A, Petzold M, Bergh C. Neonatal and maternal outcome after frozen embryo transfer: Increased risks in programmed cycles. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221(2):126–18.

Saito K, Kuwahara A, Ishikawa T, Morisaki N, Miyado M, Miyado K, et al. Endometrial preparation methods for frozen-thawed embryo transfer are associated with altered risks of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, placenta accreta and gestational diabetes mellitus. Hum Reprod. 2019;34(8):1567–75.

Li X, Wu X, Zhang Z, Li Y, Guo Y, Liu L, et al. Comparison of stimulated cycles with low dose r-FSH versus hormone replacement cycles for endometrial preparation prior to frozen-thawed embryo transfer in young women with polycystic ovarian syndrome: A single-center retrospective cohort study from China. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2021;4:68.

Guan L, Wu H, Wei C, Pang C, Liu D, Yu X, et al. The effect of mildly stimulated cycle versus artificial cycle on pregnancy outcomes in overweight/obese women with PCOS prior to frozen embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1):394.

Zhang J, Dai L, Jiang C, Zhao Y, Ma X, Cui Y, et al. Comparison of pregnancy outcomes and vaginal microbiota in endometriosis patients undergoing frozen embryo transfer using letrozole combined HMG versus hormone replacement therapy with GnRH-a pretreatment. J Biomed Res. 2025;4;1–13.

Zhang J, Dai L, Jiang C. Comparison of pregnancy outcomes and vaginal microbiota. PubMed. 2017;2:67-9.

Casper RF, Mitwally MFM. Use of the aromatase inhibitor letrozole for ovulation induction in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2011;54(4):685–95.

Mackens S, Santos-Ribeiro S, van de Vijver A, Racca A, Van Landuyt L, Tournaye H, et al. Frozen embryo transfer: a review on the optimal endometrial preparation and timing. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(11):2234–42.

Legro RS, Brzyski RG, Diamond MP, Coutifaris C, Schlaff WD, Casson P, et al. Letrozole versus clomiphene for infertility in the polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(2):119–29.

Wang R, Li W, Bordewijk EM, Legro RS, Zhang H, Wu X, et al. First-line ovulation induction for polycystic ovary syndrome: an individual participant data meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2019;5;25(6):717–32.

Ghobara T, Gelbaya TA, Ayeleke RO. Cycle regimens for frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;5;7(7):3414.