Antenatal myomectomy: when to intervene and why?

Authors

  • Shyam P. Jaiswar Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Seema Mehrotra Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Pushpa L. Sankhwar Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Manju L. Verma Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Shruti Gupta Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Sneha Aggarwal Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20260195

Keywords:

Fibroid, Myoma, Myomectomy, Caesarean section

Abstract

Uterine myomas affect 2-10% of pregnant women. In every one out of ten patients, myomas complicate the course leading to adverse pregnancy outcomes such as placental abruption, premature rupture of membranes, placenta previa, preterm labor, fetal malpresentation, Myomectomy is rarely performed during pregnancy because of fear of miscarriage and the risk of uncontrolled hemorrhage. Surgical management is needed in selected cases where conservative management fails to manage symptoms and there is a substantial risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. This article provides insight into the safety, risks and benefits of antenatal myomectomy. This is a retrospective analysis of 6 patients who underwent myomectomy between 16-19 weeks of gestation at our tertiary care centre. Decision for surgical management was based on large fibroid size and refractory pain. Myoma was enucleated via transverse incision and reconstruction of uterine wall was done in double layer. None of the patients in our study had miscarriage, preterm labour, premature rupture of membranes, placental abruption. All patients delivered at term with median gestational age of 37 weeks, 5 by elective caesarean section and one patient delivered vaginally after induction of labour. None of the patients delivered a growth-restricted fetus or a fetus with a congenital anomaly. No adverse maternal or fetal outcome was reported. Antenatal myomectomy should not be done as a routine procedure. However, in carefully selected patients in skilled hands it is a safe procedure and gives good pregnancy outcomes while avoiding the complications typically linked to the presence of myomas.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Babunashvili EL, Son DY, Buyanova SN, Schukina NA, Popov AA, Chechneva MA, et al. Outcomes of Laparotomic Myomectomy during Pregnancy for Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids: A Prospective Cohort Study. J Clin Med. 2023;12(19):6406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12196406

Saccardi C, Visentin S, Noventa M, Cosmi E, Litta P, Gizzo S. Uncertainties about laparoscopic myomectomy during pregnancy: a lack of evidence or an inherited misconception? A critical literature review starting from a peculiar case. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2015;24:189-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/13645706.2014.987678

Spyropoulou K, Kosmas I, Tsakiridis I, Mamopoulos A, Kalogiannidis I, Athanasiadis A, et al. Myomectomy during pregnancy: A systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;254:15-24.

Wang HM, Tian YC, Xue ZF, Zhang Y, Dai YM. Associations between uterine fibroids and obstetric outcomes in twin pregnancies. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2016;135:22-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.04.013

Allameh Z, Allameh T. Successful Myomectomy in the Second Trimester of Pregnancy. Adv Biomed Res. 2019;8:60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/abr.abr_236_18

Loverro G, Damiani GR, Malvasi A, Loverro M, Schonauer LM, Muzzupapa G, et al. Myomectomy during pregnancy: an obstetric overview. Minerva Obstet Gynecol. 2021;73(5):646-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-606X.21.04676-5

Vitale SG, Padula F, Gulino FA. Management of uterine fibroids in pregnancy: recent trends. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;27(6):432-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0000000000000220

Dinglas C, Kunzier N, Sanchi J, Chavez M, Vintzileos A. Ultrasound-guided manipulation of fetal entrapment by a large uterine fibroid. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(6):870.e1-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.07.041

Handa N, Anjali. Feto maternal outcomes of fibroid in pregnancy: a retrospective observational study. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2023;12:3080-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20232951

Tîrnovanu MC, Lozneanu L, Tîrnovanu ŞD, Tîrnovanu VG, Onofriescu M, Ungureanu C, et al. Uterine Fibroids and Pregnancy: A Review of the Challenges from a Romanian Tertiary Level Institution. Healthcare (Basel). 2022;10(5):855. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10050855

Spyropoulou K, Kosmas I, Tsakiridis I, Mamopoulos A, Kalogiannidis I, Athanasiadis A, Daponte A, Dagklis T. Myomectomy during pregnancy: A systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;254:15-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.08.018

Algara AC, Rodríguez AG, Vázquez AC, Valladares FEC, Ramírez PG, Padilla EL, et al. Laparoscopic Approach for Fibroid Removal at 18 Weeks of Pregnancy. Surg Technol Int. 2015;27:195-7.

Kongnyuy EJ, Wiysonge CS. Interventions to reduce haemorrhage during myomectomy for fibroids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014(8):CD005355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005355.pub5

Downloads

Published

2026-01-29

How to Cite

Jaiswar, S. P., Mehrotra, S., Sankhwar, P. L., Verma, M. L., Gupta, S., & Aggarwal, S. (2026). Antenatal myomectomy: when to intervene and why?. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 15(2), 711–715. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20260195

Issue

Section

Case Series