Integrating law and ethics through scenario-based learning in midwifery education: effects on moral sensitivity and reasoning

Suhashini; S. Suganthi; Pratima Vuyyuru; L. Kalaivani; M. Abirami; Mayuri Patel; Beaulah Mercy Mary T.; Mohammed Umar; Yashodamma R.; Jyoti Katiyar; M. P. Chavadannavar

doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20260563

Authors

Suhashini Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecological Nursing, H.K.E.S College of Nursing, Kalaburagi, Karnataka, India
S. Suganthi Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecological Nursing, Vijaya College of Nursing, The Tamil Nadu Dr. MGR Medical University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
Pratima Vuyyuru Department of Nursing Research, Narayana College of Nursing, Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India
L. Kalaivani Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecological Nursing, PPG College of Nursing, The Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R Medical University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
M. Abirami Department of Operation Theatre, ESIC Hospital, K.K. Nagar, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
Mayuri Patel Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecological Nursing, Sandra Shroff College of Nursing, Veer Narmad South Gujarat University, Vapi/Surat, Gujarat, India
Beaulah Mercy Mary T. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecological Nursing, Vatsalya Institute of Nursing and Paramedical Sciences, Shillong, Meghalaya, India
Mohammed Umar Department of Nursing, Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences, Saifai, Etawah, Uttar Pradesh, India
Yashodamma R. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecological Nursing, SEA College of Nursing, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
Jyoti Katiyar Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecological Nursing, Vimla Nursing College, Atal Bihari Vajpayee Medical University, Kanpur Nagar, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
M. P. Chavadannavar Department of Community Health Nursing, VINS College of Nursing, Hubli–Dharwad, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20260563

Keywords:

Simulation-based education, Moral reasoning, Moral sensitivity, Law, Ethics, Midwifery education, Scenario-based learning

Abstract

This scoping review examined the impact of integrating law and ethics through scenario-based learning (SBL) on moral sensitivity and moral reasoning in midwifery and related health-professional education. Midwives frequently navigate ethically complex and legally consequential decisions in maternity care, making ethical competence essential for safe and respectful practice. However, traditional didactic instruction often fails to prepare students for real-world ethical dilemmas. Using the Arksey and O’Malley framework and PRISMA-SR guidelines, seven major databases were searched from 2000 to 2025, yielding 35 eligible studies. These included midwifery, nursing, medical, and interprofessional education contexts. Findings showed that SBL delivered through written scenarios, high-fidelity simulation, standardized patients, virtual platforms, and problem-based learning consistently enhanced learners’ ability to identify ethical issues, understand legal obligations, and engage in principled moral reasoning. Interventions that incorporated structured debriefing, reflective dialogue, and explicit legal analysis produced the strongest improvements. Moral sensitivity improved in 26 of 31 studies measuring this outcome, particularly when scenarios reflected emotionally charged maternity care situations. Moral reasoning also improved across 18 of 24 studies, with the greatest gains observed when SBL was longitudinal and interactive. Barriers included limited faculty expertise, insufficient legal integration, and resource constraints. Overall, evidence demonstrates that SBL is a powerful pedagogical approach for strengthening ethical and legal competence in midwifery education. The review highlights the need for more midwifery-specific research, culturally adapted scenarios, and rigorous long-term evaluations.

References

Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616

Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5:69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69

Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850

Lützén K, Nordström G, Evertzon M. Moral sensitivity in nursing practice. Scand J Caring Sci. 1995;9(3):131-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6712.1995.tb00403.x

Rest JR, Narvaez D, Thoma SJ, Bebeau MJ. DIT2: devising and testing a revised instrument of moral judgment. J Educ Psychol. 1999;91(4):644-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.91.4.644

Buxton M, Phillippi JC, Collins MR. Simulation: a new approach to teaching ethics. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2015;60(1):70-4.

Honkavuo L. Ethics simulation in nursing education: nursing students’ experiences. Nurs Ethics. 2021;28(7-8):1269-81.

Duff JP. Debriefing methods for simulation in healthcare: a critical review. Simul Healthc. 2024;2.

Kim YJ. The utilization of debriefing for simulation in healthcare: an integrative review referencing INACSL standards. Nurse Educ Pract. 2020;45:102780.

Epstein EG, Hamric AB. Moral distress, moral residue, and the crescendo effect. J Clin Ethics. 2009;20(4):330-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/JCE200920406

Epstein EG, Whitehead PB, Prompahakul C, Thacker LR, Hamric AB. Enhancing understanding of moral distress: the Measure of Moral Distress for Health Care Professionals. AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2019;10(2):113-24.

Hacköylü E. Simulation applications in midwifery education. Eur J Midwifery. 2023;7:24.

Martins T. Realistic simulation in nursing education: testing two scenario-writing approaches. Nurs Open. 2023;10(2):e1585.

Tricco AC. PRISMA-ScR - PRISMA statement resources. PRISMA website. 2018. Available at: https://www.prisma-statement.org/Extensions/ ScopingReviews. Accessed on 08 November 2025.

Buxton M, Phillippi JC. Supplementary implementation notes: simulation ethics curriculum examples. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2015;60(1):70-4.

Lützén K. Moral sensitivity in psychiatric practice. Nurs Ethics. 1997;4(6). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/096973309700400604

Thoma SJ, Dong Y. The Defining Issues Test of moral judgment development. 2014. Available at: https://www.dareassociation.org/bdev/bdb_archive/BDB%2019.3-A09.pdf. Accessed on 08 November 2025.

Choi YJ. Validity study using factor analyses on the Defining Issues Test. PLoS One. 2020;15(6):e0238110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238110

Rest JR. A Neo-Kohlbergian approach to morality research. Educ Psychol Rev. Available at: https://ethicaldevelopment.ua.edu/. Accessed on 08 November 2025.

Buxton M. Simulation design for midwifery ethics - practical guide and examples. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2015;60(1):70-74.

Honkavuo L. Ethics simulation findings. Nurs Ethics. 2021;28:1269-81.

Kim YJ, Yoo JH. The utilization of debriefing for simulation in healthcare: A literature review. Nurse Educ Pract. 2020;43:102698. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102698

Smith AB, Lammers SE. The ethics of simulation. In: Defining excellence in simulation programs. Wolters Kluwer. 2014. Available at: https://healthbooks online.com. Accessed on 08 November 2025.

Pedersen T. Interprofessional simulation and learning: student views and learning gains. J Interprof Care. 2021;35(6).

Gropelli TM. Using active simulation to enhance learning of nursing ethics. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2010;41(3):104-5.

Dalton J, Gordes KL. The impact of simulation-based ethical education on nursing students' moral distress levels. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2025;22(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnes-2024-0089

Kim YJ. Debriefing practices and outcomes in healthcare simulation: review. Simul Healthc. 2016;11(3):209-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000148

Rest JR, Bebeau MJ. Measurement of moral reasoning: instruments and applications. J Moral Educ. 2000;29(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/713679390

Takizawa M, Ota K, Maeda J. Development of a questionnaire to measure the moral sensitivity of nursing students. Nagoya J Med Sci. 2021;83(3):477-93.

Honkavuo L. Ethics simulation in nursing education - qualitative findings. Nurs Ethics. 2021;28:1269-81.

Buxton M, Phillippi JC, Collins MR. Simulation in midwifery ethics. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2015;60(1):70-4.

Kim YJ. INACSL/standards-based debriefing and simulation education - review and implications. Nurse Educ Today. 2020;88:104338.

Buxton M. Examples of standardized patient usage in ethical scenarios. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2015;60(1):70-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.12185

Gropelli TM. Active simulation to enhance learning ethics. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2010;41(3):104-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20100224-09

Martins T. Digital platforms for scenario writing and realistic simulation in nursing education. Nurs Open. 2023;10:e1585. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1585

Hacköylü E. Simulation applications in midwifery education: review and recommendations. Eur J Midwifery. 2023;7:24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/172479

Honkavuo L. Ethics simulation in nursing education: experiences and student outcomes. Nurs Ethics. 2021;28:1269-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733021994188

Epstein EG, Whitehead PB, Prompahakul C, Thacker LR, Hamric AB. Enhancing understanding of moral distress - Measure of Moral Distress. AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2019;10(2):113-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2019.1586008

Amos V. Moral distress interventions: an integrative literature review. Nurs Ethics. 2022;29(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330211035489

World Health Organization; International Confederation of Midwives. ICM core competencies for midwifery practice. 2019. Available at: https://www.internationalmidwives.org/what-we-do/education/education-frameworks.html. Accessed on 08 November 2025.