Clinicopathological profile of ovarian tumors in the age group 10-20 years

Authors

  • Priya V. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Government Medical College, Kottayam, Kerala, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20170548

Keywords:

Imprint cytology, Laparotomy, Ovarian tumor

Abstract

Background: Adolescence is the period of transition from childhood to adulthood. 1% neoplasm occurs in this age group below 17 years, of this, 3% are ovarian neoplasms. Aim was to study retrospectively the clinicopathological profile and outcome of ovarian tumors in the age group 10-20 years in Government Medical College, Kottayam, Kerala, India from January 2008 for six years.

Methods: Fifty Patients who have undergone laparotomy in this institution during the period were taken for study. Data regarding age, mode of presentation, diagnostic methods, treatment and histopathology were recorded. Follow-up was also taken into consideration. Patients with polycystic ovary, corpus luteal cyst, follicular cyst and endometriotic cyst are excluded.

Results: Majority of the patients fall between the age group 15-20 years. Major clinical presentation was pain (40%), followed by abdominal mass. Laparotomy was done for all cases except three where laparoscopy was done. Imprint cytology taken for 3 cases. Histopathology showed malignant tumors in 6 cases and benign tumors in 44 cases. Epithelial tumors outnumbered germ cell tumors.

Conclusions: This study shows the predominance of epithelial neoplasms in the age group 10-20 years. Proportion of malignancy is 12%.

Author Biography

Priya V., Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Government Medical College, Kottayam, Kerala, India

GOVERNMENT MEDICAL COLLEGE KOTTAYAM

DEPARTMENTOF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY

ASSISTANT PROFESSOR

References

Consolidated report of hospital based cancer registries: 2012-2014. Avialable from: http:// ncrpindia.org/ALL_NCRP_REPORTS/HBCR_REPORT_2012_2014/index.htm.

Devi KU. Current status of gynecological cancer care in India. J Gynecol Oncol. 2009;20(2):77-80.

Grovas A, Fremgen A, Rauck A, Ruyman D, Hut- chinson C, Winchester D, et al. The national cancer data base report on patterns of childhood cancers in the United States. Cancer. 1997;80:2321.

Deligeoroglou E, Eleftheriades M, Shiadoes V. Ovarian masses during adolescence: clinical, ultrasonographic and pathological findings, serum tumour markers, and endocrinological profile. Gynaecol Endocrinol. 2004;19:1-8.

Rathore R, Sharma S, Arora D. Spectrum of childhood and adolescent ovarian tumours in India: 25 Years’ experience at a single institution. Maced J Med Sci. 2016;4(4):551-5.

Chellamma VK. Adolescent Ovarian 2011 KFOG Vol.5 No:3 P 3-5 5,7

Bhattacharya NK, De A. Ovarian tumours in pediatric age group- A clinic-patho study of 10 years cases in West Bengal India. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2010;31(2):54-57.

Amatya A, Rana A, Gurung G. Ovarian tumours in childhood and adolescents- our eight years experiences. NJOG. 2008;3(1):39-42.

Choudry A, Bangash N, Malik A, Choudry H. A clinico pathological review of 15 cases 2008. J Ayub Med coll Abbottabad. 2008;20(4):18-21.

Hernon M, McKenna J, Busby G, Sanders C, Garden A. The histology management of ovarian cysts found in children and adolescent presenting to a children hospital from 1991 to 2007. BJOG. 2010;117(2):181-4.

Chitrathara K, Rajaram S, Maheswari A. Ovarian Cancer: comprehensive and contemporary management. 1st ed. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.; 2009:121-122.

Piek JM, Verheijen RH, Kenemans P, Massuger LF, Bulten H, van Diest PJ. BRCA ½-related ovarian cancers are of tubal origin A hypothesis. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;90;491

Gracia CR, Chang J, Kondapalli L, Prewitt M, Carlson CA, Mattei P, et al. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation for fertility preservation in cancer patients: Successful establishment and feasibility of a multidisciplinary collaboration. J Assist Reprod Genetics. 2012;29(6):495-502.

Downloads

Published

2017-02-19

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles