Analysis of caesarean section at the University of Benin Teaching Hospital using Robson 10-group classification system: an observational retrospective study

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20260165

Keywords:

Robson classification, Caesarean section rate, Obstetric outcomes, Labour monitoring, Maternal and perinatal outcomes

Abstract

Background: Caesarean section (CS) refers to the delivery of the foetus, placenta, and membranes through an abdominal and uterine incision.  In order to understand the factors responsible for rising CS rate and suggest effective measures to reduce CS rate, it is necessary to have a tool to monitor and compare CS rate in the same setting, over time and between different settings. It has been shown that women-based classification in general and the 10-group classification in particular were best to fulfil current international and local needs. This study aimed to analyse Caesarean sections at the University of Benin Teaching Hospital over one year using the Robson 10 group classification system.

Methods: This is an observational retrospective study at the University of Benin Teaching Hospital (UBTH), Benin City, Edo State, Nigeria. All women who gave birth at UBTH from January 1st 2020, to December 31st 2020, were studied. Data were collected using a proforma, chi-square analysis was done, and a p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: The Caesarean section rate during the study period of this was 45.8%. Using the Robson classification system, the highest group of women that delivered during the period was group 3 (multiparous (excluding previous CS), single cephalic, ≥/37weeks in spontaneous labour), followed by Group 5 (all multiparous with at least 1 previous CS, single cephallic, ≥/37weeks) and Group 4 (multiparous, excluding previous CS), single cephallic, ≥/37weeks, induced or pre labour CS). The highest contributing group to CS rate was Group 5, followed by Group 2 (nulliparous, single cephallic, ≥/37weeks, induced or pre labour CS), Group 10 (all women with a single cephallic pregnancy, <37 weeks, including women with previous CS(s)) and Group 4. Groups 8 (all women with multiple pregnancies, including women with previous CS(s)),10 and 7 (all multiparous women with a singleton breech pregnancy, including women with previous CS(s)) had the highest contribution to stillbirth and babies with 5th minute APGAR less than 7.

Conclusions: The study revealed a high CS rate in UBTH, with Robson Groups 5,10 and 2 accounting for a large percent of the CS rate during the study period. Effort should be targeted at reducing primary CS rate by reducing the incidence of failed IOL in nulliparous to the barest minimum, appropriate monitoring of labour to reduce the incidence of positional CPD, increased utilization of alternative to CS section, such as instrumental delivery and external cephalic version when they are indicated. The trend of increasing utilization of CS for indications that is not purely obstetric, such as maternal request, should be discouraged.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Incerpi MH. Operative Delivery. Current Diagn Treat Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;636-60.

Kwawukume EY, Laryea HNO. Caesarean Section. Comprehensive Obstetrics in the Tropics. 2015;405-14.

Tongon F, Borghero A, Putoto G, Maziku D, Torelli GF, Azzimonti G, et al. Analysis of Caesarean section and neonatal outcome using the Robson classification in a rural district hospital in Tanzania: an Observational retrospective study. BMJ Open. 2019;9(12): e033348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033348

Chung WH, Kong CW, To WWK. Secular trends in Caesarean section rates over 20 years in a regional obstetric unit in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J. 2017;23(4):340-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12809/hkmj176217

Thomas S, Meadows J, Mcqueen KAK. Access to Caesarean section will reduce maternal mortality in low-income countries: a mathematical model. World J Surg. 2016;40(7):1537-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3479-0

United Nations General Assembly. Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development, 2015. Available at: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld/publication. (Accessed September 2021). Accessed on 12 October 2025.

Tura AK, Pijpers O, de Man M, Cleveringa M, Koopmans I, Gure T, et al. Analysis of Caesarean sections using Robson 10-group classification system in a university hospital in eastern Ethiopias: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2018;8(4):e020520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020520

Mahadik K. Rising Caesarean Rates: Are Primary Sections Overused?. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2019;69(6):483-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-019-01246-y

Kant A, Mendiratta S. Classification of Caesarean section through Robson Criteria: an emerging concept to audit the increasing Caesarean section rate. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7(11):4674-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20184528

WHO. WHO statement on Caesarean section rates. Available at: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal_perinatal_health/cs‐statement/en/. Accessed on 12 October 2025.

Khan MA, Sohail I, Habib M. Auditing the Caesarean section rate by Robson’s ten group classification system at tertiary care Hospital. Professional Med J. 2020;27(4):700-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29309/TPMJ/2020.27.04.3383

Ogundele OJ, Pavlova M, Groot W. Examining trends in inequality in the use of reproductive health care services in Ghana and Nigeria. BMC pregnancy childbirth. 2018;18(1):492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-2102-9

Gu J, Karmakar-Hore S, Hogan M, Azzam HM, Barrett JFR, Brown A, et al. Examining Caesarean Section Rates in Canada Using the Modified Robson Classification. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2020;42(6):757-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2019.09.009

Ji H, Jiang H, Yang L, Qian X, Tang S. Factors contributing to the rapid rise of Caesarean Section: a prospective study of primiparous Chinese women in Shanghai. BMJ Open. 2015;5(11):e008994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008994

Robson Classification: Implementation Manual. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017. Available at: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal-perinatal-health/robson-classification/en/. Accessed on 12 October 2025.

Vogel PJ, Betran AP, Vindevoghel N, Souza JP, Torloni MR, Zhang J et al. Use of the Robson classification to assess Caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys. Lancet Global Health. 2015;3(5):260- 70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(15)70094-X

Robson M, Murphy M, Byrne F. Quality assurance: The 10-Group Classification System (Robson classification) induction of labour, and Caesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;131:S23-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.04.026

Betran AP, Vindevoghel N, Souza JP, Gulmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. Asystematic review of the Robson Classification for Caesarean section: What works, Doesn’t work and how to improve it. Plos One. 2014;9(6):e97769. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097769

Tapia V, Betran AP, Gonzales GF. Caesarean section in Peru: Analysis of trends using the Robson classification system. Plos One. 2016;11(2):e0148138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148138

Amadasun FE, Idehen HO, Edomwonyi NP. Evolving pattern of anaesthesia for Caesarean Section experience at the University of Benin Teaching Hospital. West Afr J Med. 2013;32(3):196-9.

Osegi N, Makinde OI. Towards optimizing Caesarean section: a five-year review of Caesarean sections at a Southern Nigeria hospital. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2020;9(1):205-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20196021

Okonta PI, Otoide VO, Okogbenin SA. Caesarean section at the University of Benin Teaching Hospital revisited. Tropical J Obstetr Gynaecol. 2004;20(1):63-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/tjog.v20i1.14404

Berglundh S, Benova L, Olisaekee G, Hanson C. Caesarean section rate in Nigeria between 2013 and 2018 by obstetric risk and socio‐economic status. Trop Med Int Health. 2021;26(7):775-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.13579

Bello OO, Agboola AD. Utilizing the Robson 10-Group Classification System as an Audit Tool in Assessing the Soaring Caesarean Section Rates in Ibadan, Nigeria. J West Afr Coll Surg. 2022;12(1):64-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jwas.jwas_43_22

Kenny LC. Antenatal obstetrics complications. Obstetrics by Ten Teachers. Boca Raton: CRC press Taylor and Francis Group. 2017: 79-104.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-29

How to Cite

Emuze, C. E., Iweka, R. O., Ande, A. B., & Enabudoso, E. J. (2026). Analysis of caesarean section at the University of Benin Teaching Hospital using Robson 10-group classification system: an observational retrospective study. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 15(2), 475–482. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20260165

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles