Prospective study on success rate and outcomes of trial of labour after caesarean at a tertiary hospital

Authors

  • A. Shanti Sri Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fernandez Hospital, Hyderabad, India
  • Shravya Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fernandez Hospital, Hyderabad, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20262520

Keywords:

Caesarean section, Scarred uterus, Maternal and fetal outcomes

Abstract

Background: The increasing prevalence of pregnancies with a scarred uterus has led to a rise in repeat caesarean sections (CS), which are associated with significant maternal morbidity. Trial of labour after caesarean (TOLAC) offers an alternative to reduce CS rates and associated complications. This study aimed to determine the success rate of TOLAC and evaluate maternal and fetal outcomes in a tertiary care hospital.

Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted over one year (April 2023 to February 2024) at Fernandez Hospital  a tertiary maternity centre. A total of 206 women with singleton term pregnancies and one previous lower segment caesarean section (LSCS), eligible and consenting for TOLAC, were included. Women with contraindications to vaginal birth or significant comorbidities were excluded. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were recorded and analyzed using appropriate statistical tests, with p<0.05 considered significant.

Results: The success rate of TOLAC was 21.8% (45/206). Factors significantly associated with successful vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) included younger maternal age (p=0.019), shorter inter-delivery interval (p=0.048), previous VBAC (p<0.001) and spontaneous onset of labour (p=0.001). Induced labour was associated with higher CS rates. Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) was significantly higher in the VBAC group (20% vs 6.2%, p=0.009). There were no cases of maternal mortality or major surgical injuries. Neonatal outcomes, including NICU admission and morbidity, were comparable between groups, with no neonatal deaths reported. Cord arterial pH was slightly lower in the VBAC group (p=0.023), though clinically acceptable.

Conclusions: The success rate of TOLAC in this study was relatively low, likely due to high induction rates. However, with careful selection and monitoring, TOLAC remains a safe option without significant adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes. Reducing unnecessary inductions and primary caesarean sections may improve VBAC success rates.

 

References

World Health Organisation Human Reproduction Programme A.WHO statement on caesarean section rates. Reprod Health Matters. 2015;23(45):149-50.

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Birth after previous caesarean birth. Green-top Guideline No. 45. London: RCOG. 2021.

Jagannathan SP, Sunil HM, Nalligounder A. A comparative study of fetomaternal outcome of elective cesarean and vaginal birth after caesarean section in a tertiary care centre in South India. J South Asian Feder Obst Gynae. 2021;13(5):283-7.

Guise JM, Berlin M, Mc Donagh M, Osterweil P, Chan B, Helfand M. Safety of Vaginal Birth after Caesarean, a systematic review. Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;3:420-9.

Martel MJ, MacKinnon CJ. Clinical practise obstetrics committee. Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous Caesarean. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;40(3):195-207

Daniel WW. Determination of sample size for estimating proportions. Biostatistics A foundation for analysis in the health sciences. 1999;8:189-90.

Singh T, Thapa A, Rana P, Rauf SR, Shapoo MS, Aggarwal S, et al. A study on the outcome of a trial of labour after cesarean (TOLAC) with one previous caesarean delivery. Indian J Obgyn. 2022;9(1):46-51.

Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermúdez A, Kafury-Goeta AC. Effects of birth spacing on maternal health: a systematic review. American J Obst Gynecol. 2007;196(4):297-308.

Rahman R, Khanam N, Islam N, Begum K, Pervin H, Arifuzzaman M. The outcome of vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC): a descriptive study. Med Today. 2013;25(1):14-7.

Sangwan V, Siwach S, Lakra P, Sangwan M, Singh S, Mahendru R. Obstetric outcome of induction of labour using prostaglandin gel in patients with previous one cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2019;62(6):397-403.

Tanos V, Toney ZA. Uterine scar rupture prediction, prevention, diagnosis and management. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;59:115–31.

Holmgren CM. Uterine rupture associated with VBAC. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2012;55(4):978-87.

Tarney CM. Bladder injury during cesarean delivery. Curr Women’s Health Rev. 2013;9(2):70–6.

Studsgaard A, Skorstengaard M, Glavind J, Hvidman L, Uldbjerg N. Trial of labor compared to repeat cesarean section in women with no other risk factors than a prior cesarean delivery. Acta ObstetGynecol Scand. 2013;92(11):87.

Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Varner MW, et al. National institute of child health and human development maternal-fetal medicine unit’s network. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(25):2581-9.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-29

How to Cite

Sri, A. S., & Shravya. (2026). Prospective study on success rate and outcomes of trial of labour after caesarean at a tertiary hospital. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 15(8), 2973–2978. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20262520

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles