Role of ultrasound markers in predicting early pregnancy loss: a systematic review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20261468Keywords:
Early pregnancy loss, Early pregnancy ultrasound markers, Ultrasound in predicting early pregnancy outcomesAbstract
Early pregnancy loss (EPL), defined as pregnancy loss before 13 weeks’ gestation, affects approximately 10–20% of pregnancies and represents a major source of clinical uncertainty within early pregnancy assessment units (EPAUs). Although several ultrasound parameters are routinely measured in early pregnancy, their predictive value for EPL is not consistently applied in clinical practice. A structured review of English-language literature published over the past 10 years was conducted using PubMed, OVID, CINAHL, and Biomed Central databases to evaluate ultrasound markers associated with EPL. Evidence consistently supports predictive value for routinely obtained markers, including crown–rump length (CRL), fetal heart rate (FHR), gestational sac measurements (GSD/MSD), and yolk sac diameter (YSD). Several studies indicate that abnormalities in yolk sac (YS) characteristics and gestational sac (GS) growth may precede changes in FHR or CRL in pregnancies that subsequently miscarry. More recent data refine subchorionic haematoma (SCH) risk stratification, demonstrating a graded association between miscarriage risk and SCH burden expressed as a proportion of GS size, including in assisted reproduction populations. Emerging studies propose gestation-specific predictive thresholds and integrative models using ultrasound indices with or without biochemical markers, while machine-learning and artificial intelligence approaches show high discrimination in selected cohorts. Incorporating routinely measured ultrasound markers into structured early pregnancy assessment may improve counselling and risk stratification, although broader validation is required before advanced predictive models can be adopted routinely.
References
Royal College of Physicians of Ireland. National clinical practice guideline: first trimester miscarriage. Dublin: RCPI. Available at: https://www.hse. ie/eng/about/who/acute-hospitals-division/ woman-infants/clinical-guidelines/. Accessed on 12 February 2026.
Health Service Executive. Signs of miscarriage. 2025. Available at: https://www2.hse.ie/conditions/miscarr iage/. Accessed on 12 February 2026.
DeVilbiss EA, Mumford S, Sjaarda L, Connell MT, Rafique S, Plowden TC. First trimester low fetal heart rate and small crown-rump length, but not subchorionic hemorrhage or yolk sac diameter, predict pregnancy loss among women with history of pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(4):e258.
Detti L, Francillon L, Christiansen ME, Peregrin-Alvarez I, Goedecke PJ, Bursac Z. Early pregnancy ultrasound measurements and prediction of first trimester pregnancy loss: a logistic model. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1).
Liang W, Yan X, Shi Y, Chen B, An L, Huang B. Association between graded subchorionic hematoma and adverse pregnancy outcomes in singleton pregnancies: a prospective observational cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023;309(2):541-9.
Yoshihara T, Okuda Y, Yoshino O. Quantification of the size of subchorionic hematoma causing pregnancy-related complications: a retrospective cohort study. J Med Ultrasound. 2024;51(4):649-54.
Liu C, Wei X, Wang F. The predictive value of ultrasound markers for pregnancy outcomes in recurrent pregnancy loss: a retrospective study. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1).
Levine LD, Holland TL, Kim K, Sjaarda LA, Mumford SL, Schisterman EF. The role of aspirin and inflammation on reproduction: the EAGeR trial. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2018;97(3):187-92.
Hassan M. A logistic model of early pregnancy ultrasound measurements and prediction of first-trimester outcome. Minia J Med Res. 2022;10:1-10.
Sammut L, Bezzina P, Gibbs V, Baron YM, Agius A, Agius JC. Predicting first-trimester pregnancy outcome in threatened miscarriage: a comparison of a multivariate logistic regression and machine learning models. 2025;31(6):103159.
Liu L, Zang Y, Zheng H, Li S, Song Y, Feng X, et al. An AI method to predict pregnancy loss by extracting biological indicators from embryo ultrasound recordings in early pregnancy. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1).
Chen P, Hu Y, Liu X, Zhao W, Fang C. Association between the proportion of subchorionic hematoma within the gestational sac and miscarriage rate in IVF/ICSI patients. Front Med (Lausanne). 2026;12:1630213.
Petersen JF, Friis-Hansen LJ, Bryndorf T, Jensen AK, Andersen AN, Lokkegaard E. A novel approach to predicting early pregnancy outcomes dynamically in a prospective cohort using repeated ultrasound and serum biomarkers. Reprod Sci. 2023;30(12):3597-609.
Hassan M. A logistic model of early pregnancy ultrasound measurements and prediction of first-trimester outcome. Minia J Med Res. 2022;10:1-10.
Preisler J, Kopeika J, Ismail L, Vathanan V, Farren J, Abdallah Y, et al. Defining safe criteria to diagnose miscarriage: prospective observational multicentre study. BMJ. 2015;351:h4579.
Al-Memar M, Fourie H, Vaulet T, Lawson K, Bobdiwala S, Saso S, et al. Using simple clinical and ultrasound variables to develop a model to predict first trimester pregnancy viability. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2024;292:187-93.
Oxford Brookes University. CASP checklists. Oxford: Oxford Brookes University. 2023.
PRISMA Group. PRISMA 2020 flow diagram. 2020. Available at: https://www.prismastatement.org/ prisma-2020-flow-diagram. Accessed on 12 February 2026.
Bottomley C. Ultrasound to diagnose and predict early pregnancy outcome. Early Pregnancy. 2025;229-44.
Datta MR, Raut A. Efficacy of first-trimester ultrasound parameters for prediction of early spontaneous abortion. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2017;138(3):325-30.
Yu FN, Leung K. Diagnosis and prediction of miscarriage: can we do better? Hong Kong Med J. 2020;26(2):90-2.
Huang J, Zhu W, Tang J, Saravelos SH, Poon LCY, Li TC. Do specific ultrasonography features identified at the time of early pregnancy loss predict fetal chromosomal abnormality? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Genes Dis. 2019;6(2):129-37.
Taylor TJ, Quinton AE, Bradley J, Hyett JA. First-trimester ultrasound features associated with subsequent miscarriage: a prospective study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;59(5):641-8.
Li H, Qin S, Xiao F, Li Y, Gao Y, Zhang J. Predicting first-trimester outcome of embryos with cardiac activity in women with recurrent spontaneous abortion. J Int Med Res. 2020;48(6).
Shaamash AH, Aly HA, Abdel-Aleem M, Akhnowkh SN. Clinical and ultrasound evaluation of early threatened miscarriage to predict pregnancy continuation up to 28 weeks. J Ultrasound Med. 2020;39(9):1777-85.
Wan OYK, Chan SSC, Chung JPW, Kwok JWK, Lao TTH, Sahota DS. External validation of a simple scoring system to predict pregnancy viability in women presenting to an early pregnancy assessment clinic. Hong Kong Med J. 2020;26(2):102-10.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
