Clinical spectrum and management outcomes of caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: a case series

Authors

  • Nilofer I. Yelurker Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Hospital, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • Deeksha S. Poojary Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Hospital, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • Meena N. Satia Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Hospital, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • Vijaya R. Badhwar Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Hospital, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20262130

Keywords:

Caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy, Methotrexate, Laparoscopic excision, Hysteroscopy, Uterine scar pregnancy

Abstract

Caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy (CSEP) is uncommon in routine obstetric practice, but when it occurs it can become rapidly dangerous. Implantation within a previous caesarean scar carries a real risk of severe haemorrhage, uterine rupture and loss of fertility if the diagnosis is missed or delayed. With rising caesarean section rates in India, clinicians encounter this condition more often, yet management remains individualized rather than protocol driven. We reviewed seven consecutive women diagnosed with CSEP at a tertiary care centre in India. All patients were haemodynamically stable at presentation. Diagnosis was based primarily on transvaginal ultrasound, with MRI used selectively when imaging was equivocal or myometrial thinning was significant. All women were initially offered medical management using methotrexate, with folinic acid and letrozole added in selected cases. Patients were followed with serial β-hCG measurements and repeat imaging. Surgical intervention was reserved for non-responders or those who developed clinical deterioration. Five of seven women (71.4%) responded well to conservative medical treatment, showing a gradual fall in β-hCG levels and resolution of the scar pregnancy on imaging. Two patients (28.6%) ultimately required surgery. One underwent laparoscopic excision of the scar ectopic with uterine repair, while the other required obstetric hysterectomy following uncontrolled bleeding during attempted hysteroscopic evacuation. Our experience suggests that stable women diagnosed early in the first trimester can often be managed successfully with medical therapy under close surveillance. Nevertheless, CSEP remains unpredictable and timely escalation to surgery is crucial when clinical or biochemical trends are unfavourable.

References

Mehta AV, Panchal PP, Shroff DJ, Shah SR, Shah PT. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy – case series: diagnosis and treatment at tertiary care hospital. BJKines Nat J Basic Appl Sci. 2023;15(1):136-9.

Agarwal N, Gainder S, Chopra S, Rohilla M, Prasad GR, Jain V. The management of scar ectopic: a single-center experience. Cureus. 2021;13(6):e15881.

Kaur H, Aggarwal M, Kaur S, Kaur J, Choudhary V, Kaur J, et al. Evaluation of outcome of medical and surgical management in cesarean scar pregnancy in a tertiary health care institute of Northern India. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2024;13(10):2891-9.

Sreelatha S, Manjula M, Nirmala C. Clinical profile and outcome of caesarean scar pregnancy in a tertiary care center-a one year study. J Med Sci Clin Res. 2017;5(4).

Arif GK, Fattah CN. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy in relation to previous obstetrical history. J Sulaimani Med Coll. 2023;13(1):83-8.

Dar FA, Choudhary N, Farooq O. Association between previous cesarean section and subsequent ectopic pregnancy: a comparative observational study. Int J Res Rev. 2023;10(5):490-6.

Biyagama BR, Fernando A, Silva KCDP, Kobalakrishnan M, Wijenayake UN. Laparoscopic excision of caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. Ceylon Med J. 2015;60(3):111-2.

Sultana J, Dewan F, Kazal RK, Khan MM, Sultana M. Caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy treated with local methotrexate: a case report. Bangladesh J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;30(1):43-8.

Ash A, Smith A, Maxwell D. Caesarean scar pregnancy. BJOG. 2007;114(3):253-63.

Ben-Nagi J, Walker A, Jurkovic D, Yazbek J, Aplin JD. Effect of cesarean delivery on the endometrium. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2009;106(1):30-4.

Jurkovic D, Hillaby K, Woelfer B, Lawrence A, Salim R, Elson CJ. First-trimester diagnosis and management of pregnancies implanted into the lower uterine segment cesarean section scar. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21(3):220-7.

Deans R, Abbott J. Hysteroscopic management of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(6):1735-40.

Harzif AK, Maidarti M, Shadrina A, Saroyo YB. Cesarean scar pregnancy management: different approach for different situation; a case series. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021;70:102808.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-26

How to Cite

Yelurker, N. I., Poojary, D. S., Satia, M. N., & Badhwar, V. R. (2026). Clinical spectrum and management outcomes of caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: a case series . International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 15(7), 2738–2745. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20262130

Issue

Section

Case Series