A three-year retrospective study of female sterilization failure at a tertiary care hospital

Authors

  • Rekha V. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Government Tiruvanamalai Medical College and Hospital, Thiruvannamalai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Jayanthi K. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Government Tiruvanamalai Medical College and Hospital, Thiruvannamalai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Saranya K. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Government Tiruvanamalai Medical College and Hospital, Thiruvannamalai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Uthra K. G. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Government Tiruvanamalai Medical College and Hospital, Thiruvannamalai, Tamil Nadu, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20261257

Keywords:

Abdominal tubal ligation, Failed female sterilization, Tubal block, Permanent sterilization, Recanalization, Modified Pomeroy technique

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to analyze the demographic trends, clinical patterns, sterilization methods, timing of procedures, interval to failure, and etiological factors contributing to female sterilization failure over a continuous three-year period at a tertiary care hospital.

Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study examined all cases of sterilization failure documented between January 2022 and December 2024. Data were retrieved from departmental sterilization audit sheets and included age, parity, method of sterilization, timing, interval to conception, and causes of failure. Statistical comparison was performed against established literature.

Results: A total of 60 sterilization-failure cases were recorded. The age group 26-30 years accounted for the largest proportion (38%). Most women were G2 (48.33%). The Modified Pomeroy Technique (MPT) was the most frequently used method and was associated with the majority of failures. The highest number of failures occurred between 1 and 5 years after sterilization. The leading cause of failure was tubal recanalization, accounting for 50% of cases, followed by non-ligation of tube and improper technique.

Conclusions: Sterilization failure still occurs despite being regarded as a permanent contraceptive method. Appropriate case selection, strict adherence to standardized surgical techniques, and improved counselling can reduce the incidence. Periodic audits should be mandated to identify preventable factors and training gaps.

References

Date SV, Rokade J, Mule V, Sharma R, Barate P. Female sterilization failure: Review over a decade. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2014;4(2):81-5.

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Male and female sterilisation. London: RCOG Press; 2004.

Trussell J, Guilbert E, Hedley A. Sterilization failure and reversal in Quebec. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101(4):677-84.

Peterson HB, Xia Z, Hughes JM, Wilcox LS, Tylor LR, Trussell J, et al. The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization: Findings from the U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization (CREST) study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174:1161-8.

Varma R, Gupta JK. Failed sterilisation: Evidence-based review and medico-legal ramifications. BJOG. 2004;111(12):1322-32.

Rathod S, Samal SK. Clinical analysis of post sterilisation failure cases in a tertiary hospital. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6(8):3294.

Kulier R, Boulvain M, Walker D, de Candolle G, Campana A. Minilaparotomy and endoscopic techniques for tubal sterilization. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(3):CD001328.

Hughes GJ. Sterilisation failure. Br Med J. 1977;2(6098):1337-9.

Shah JP, Parulekar SV, Hinduja IN. Ectopic pregnancy after tubal sterilization. J Postgrad Med. 1991;37(1):17-20.

Sharma D, Singhal SR, Singhal SK. Uterus didelphys: A rare cause of sterilization failure. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;38(3):327-8.

Jamieson DJ, Hillis SD, Duerr A, Marchbanks PA, Costello C, Peterson HB. Complications of interval laparoscopic sterilization: Findings from the United States Collaborative Review of Sterilization. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96(6):997-1002.

Rani R, Sharma R, Kohli C. Female sterilization failure, consequences and further contraception: a review of cases over ten years. Int J Reproduct Contracept Obstetr Gynecol. 2020 Oct 1;9(10):4033.

Harlow BL, Zeger SL. Risk factors for sterilization failure. Fertil Steril.

Chan LM, Westhoff CL. Tubal sterilization trends in the United States. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(1):1-6.

Horne AW, Critchley HO. Mechanisms of disease: the endocrinology of ectopic pregnancy. Exp Revi Molecul Medi. 2012;14:e7.

Cleland J, Bernstein S, Ezeh A, Faundes A, Glasier A, Innis J. Family planning: the unfinished agenda. Lancet. 2006;368(9549):1810-27.

Pandey D, Sehgal K. Medico-legal issues in failed sterilization. J Indian Med Assoc. 2003;101(7):424-5.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-28

How to Cite

V., R., K., J., K., S., & K. G., U. (2026). A three-year retrospective study of female sterilization failure at a tertiary care hospital. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 15(5), 1618–1624. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20261257

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles