A longitudinal study on short- and long-term complications following hysterectomy: a comparative analysis between abdominal and vaginal routes in women aged over 30 years at a tertiary care hospital in Puducherry, India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20261259Keywords:
Abdominal hysterectomy, Vaginal hysterectomy, Postoperative complications, Hysterectomy, BMI, Gynaecological surgeryAbstract
Background: Hysterectomy remains one of the most commonly performed gynaecological procedures worldwide. Understanding the short- and long-term complication profiles of abdominal hysterectomy (AH) and vaginal hysterectomy (VH) is essential for guiding surgical decision-making, particularly in resource-limited settings. This study aimed to compare short-term (≤30 days) and long-term (≤6 months) postoperative complications between AH and VH and to identify patient- and surgery-related predictors of postoperative morbidity.
Methods: A prospective longitudinal study was conducted among 110 women aged >30 years undergoing AH or VH at a tertiary care hospital. Participants were followed at regular intervals for six months. Baseline characteristics, intraoperative parameters, and postoperative complications were recorded. Group comparisons were performed using Chi-square and independent t-tests. Predictors of complications were examined using multivariable logistic regression.
Results: Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between groups. VH was associated with significantly shorter operative time, lower blood loss, and reduced need for blood transfusion compared with AH. Short-term complications particularly wound infection and prolonged hospital stay were more common following AH. Long-term complications did not differ significantly between groups, with similar rates of chronic pelvic pain, urinary symptoms, and psychological distress. Higher BMI (≥28 kg/m²) emerged as the only significant independent predictor of postoperative complications (AOR 2.12, p=0.03).
Conclusions: VH offers clear short-term advantages over AH, including faster recovery and fewer immediate postoperative complications. Long-term outcomes, however, are broadly comparable between the two approaches. Elevated BMI significantly increases the risk of postoperative morbidity regardless of surgical route. These findings reinforce the importance of individualized surgical planning and preoperative optimisation to improve patient outcomes.
References
Wu JM, Wechter ME, Geller EJ, Nguyen TV, Visco AG. Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(5):1091-5.
Hammer A, Rositch AF, Kahlert J, Gravitt PE. Global epidemiology of hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(6):713-4.
Desai P, Patel P, Gupta P. Trends in hysterectomy practices in India. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2019;69(5):464-70.
Garry R. The future of hysterectomy. BJOG. 2005;112(2):133-9.
Kovac SR. Guidelines to determine the route of hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;85(1):18-23.
ACOG Committee on Gynecologic Practice. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 444: Choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:1156-8.
Clarke-Pearson DL, Geller EJ. Complications of hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(3):654-73.
Thakar R. Hysterectomy: long-term considerations. BJOG. 2002;109(7):795-6.
Prusty RK, Choithani C, Gupta SD. Predictors of hysterectomy among women in India: evidence from a recent national survey. Reprod Health. 2018;15:3.
Wright JD, Herzog TJ, Tsui J, Ananth CV, Lewin SN, Burke WM, et al. Nationwide assessment of outcomes following hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115:124-31.
Kovac SR. Vaginal hysterectomy: an update. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;53(1):18-27.
Garry R. The place of abdominal hysterectomy today. BJOG. 2005;112(9):1050-2.
Rout D, Sinha A, Palo SK, Kanungo S, Pati S. Prevalence and determinants of hysterectomy in India. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):14569.
Lethaby A, Mukhopadhyay A, Naik R. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;8:CD003677.
AlKadri HM, Al Anazi BK, Tamim HM. Short- and long-term complications of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy for benign disease. Saudi Med J. 2002;23(7):806-10.
Sindhu NR, Ramesh V, Shetty S, Rai S. Analysing short- and long-term complications of hysterectomy: a prospective study. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2021;10(4):115-22.
Carlson KJ, Miller BA, Fowler FJ Jr. The impact of hysterectomy on sexual function. JAMA. 1994;272(22):1825-31.
Lethaby A, Ivanova V, Johnson NP. Total versus subtotal hysterectomy for benign gynaecological conditions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;4:CD004993.
Wenzel HHB, van der Aa MA, de Vries M, Vos MC, Bekkers RLM. Short-term surgical complications after hysterectomy: a nationwide cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99(2):240-8.
Maher C, Feiner B, DeCuyper E, Nichlos C, Hickey K. Pelvic floor repair at the time of vaginal hysterectomy for uterovaginal prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(11):1883-91.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
