Laparoscopic Davydon’s vaginoplasty for a case of Mayer-Rokitansky–Küster-Hauser syndrome: a case report

Authors

  • Pooja Hosamnani Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Government Medical College, Akola, Maharashtra, India
  • Shyamkumar Sirsam Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Government Medical College, Akola, Maharashtra, India
  • Vivek Karale Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Government Medical College, Akola, Maharashtra, India
  • Ankush Ajmera Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Government Medical College, Akola, Maharashtra, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20260926

Keywords:

MRKH syndrome, Davydov vaginoplasty, Laparoscopy, Vaginal agenesis, Neovagina

Abstract

Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome is a congenital Mullerian anomaly characterized by agenesis of uterus and upper vagina in women with normal secondary sexual characteristics and normal ovarian function. Creation of a functional neovagina is essential for sexual function and psychological wellbeing. Laparoscopic Davydov vaginoplasty utilizes autologous peritoneum and offers excellent anatomical and functional outcomes. We reported a case of a 21‑year‑old female presenting with primary amenorrhea diagnosed with MRKH syndrome and successfully managed with laparoscopic Davydov vaginoplasty. The procedure was completed without complications. A neovaginal length of 8 cm was achieved with satisfactory anatomical outcome. Laparoscopic Davydov vaginoplasty is a safe, minimally invasive, and effective technique for vaginal reconstruction in MRKH syndrome.

References

Herlin MK, Petersen MB, Brännström M. Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome: a comprehensive update. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2020;15(1):214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-020-01491-9

Kyei-Barffour I, Margetts M, Vash-Margita A, Pelosi E. The embryological landscape of Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome: genetics and environmental factors. Yale J Biol Med. 2021;94(4):657-72.

Cheikhelard A, Bidet M, Baptiste A. Surgery is not superior to dilation for the management of vaginal agenesis in Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome: a multicenter comparative observational study in 131 patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219(3):281-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.07.015

Callens N, De Cuypere G, De Sutter P. An update on surgical and non-surgical treatments for vaginal hypoplasia. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(5):775-801. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmu024

Rock JA, Breech LL. Surgery for anomalies of the Mullerian ducts. In: Rock JA, Jones HW III, editors. Te Linde’s operative gynaecology. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2008:539-584.

Grimbizis GF, Gordts S, Di Spiezio Sardo A. The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(8):2032-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det098

Herlin M, Højland AT, Petersen MB. Familial occurrence of Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome: a case report and review of the literature. Am J Med Genet A. 2014;164(9):2276-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.36652

Downloads

Published

2026-03-27

How to Cite

Hosamnani, P., Sirsam, S., Karale, V., & Ajmera, A. (2026). Laparoscopic Davydon’s vaginoplasty for a case of Mayer-Rokitansky–Küster-Hauser syndrome: a case report. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 15(4), 1473–1475. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20260926

Issue

Section

Case Reports