Controlled ovarian stimulation in women with very high AMH-balancing yield, quality and safety: a case series

Authors

  • Vishwaja A. Bakshi Department of Reproductive Medicine and Research, Nowrosjee Wadia Maternity Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • Grishma Desai Department of Reproductive Medicine and Research, Nowrosjee Wadia Maternity Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • Mounica V. Gotluru Department of Reproductive Medicine and Research, Nowrosjee Wadia Maternity Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20261286

Keywords:

Anti mullerian hormone, Polycyctic ovarian syndrome, Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, Embryo, Oocytes, Invitro fertilisation

Abstract

Anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) is widely used as a marker of ovarian reserve and a predictor of ovarian response during controlled ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive techniques. While its role in predicting oocyte yield is well established, its association with embryo quality and developmental potential remains debated. This retrospective case series describes outcomes in three women undergoing IVF/ICSI with AMH levels >20 ng/ml, aiming to illustrate variability in response despite similar hormonal profiles. All patients underwent antagonist protocols with agonist trigger to reduce the risk of hyperstimulation. High yield of oocytes (19–34) and satisfactory fertilization rates (63–80%) were demonstrated by all. Day 3 conversion rates were high, however, blastocyst yield and quality varied. This reflected differences in oocyte morphology and developmental competence. Variability in oocyte quality and blastocyst formation among patients with similarly elevated AMH levels highlights the multifactorial nature of embryo competence.3 AMH should therefore be interpreted alongside age, oocyte morphology, and stimulation parameters, rather than as a sole predictor of embryological or clinical outcomes.

References

Liu Y, Pan Z, Wu Y, Song J, Chen J. Comparison of anti-Müllerian hormone and antral follicle count in the prediction of ovarian response: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Ovarian Res. 2023;16(1):117.

Lin WQ, Yao LN, Zhang DX, Zhang W, Yang XJ, Yu R. The predictive value of anti-Mullerian hormone on embryo quality, blastocyst development, and pregnancy rate following in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET). J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;30(5):649-55.

Muharam R, Prasetyo YD, Prabowo KA, Putri YI, Maidarti M, Hestiantoro A. IVF outcome with a high level of AMH: a focus on PCOS versus non-PCOS. BMC Womens Health. 2022;22(1):172.

Zheng H, Chen S, Du H, Ling J, Wu Y, Liu H, et al. Ovarian response prediction in controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF using anti-Müllerian hormone in Chinese women: A retrospective cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(13):e6495.

Wang Q, Lang J, Zhi Y, Zhu X, Fu Y. Predicting

factors of ovarian responses in infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing IVF/ICSI. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025;42(3):865-74.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-28

How to Cite

Bakshi, V. A., Desai, G., & Gotluru, M. V. (2026). Controlled ovarian stimulation in women with very high AMH-balancing yield, quality and safety: a case series. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 15(5), 1785–1787. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20261286

Issue

Section

Case Series