Obstetric factors associated with cesarean section: a retrospective study of 1,485 births in Southern Brazil

Gabriela da Silva Garcia Faller; Natália Lenz Follmann; Liengred  Barbosa Cardoso; Juliana Koakovski Acosta; André Anjos da Silva; Gabriela Laste

doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20261248

Authors

Gabriela da Silva Garcia Faller Program in Medical Sciences, University of Taquari Valley - Univates, Lajeado, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Natália Lenz Follmann Medical School, University of Taquari Valley - Univates, Lajeado, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Liengred Barbosa Cardoso Program in Medical Sciences, University of Taquari Valley - Univates, Lajeado, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Juliana Koakovski Acosta Biomedicine School, University of Taquari Valley - Univates, Lajeado, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
André Anjos da Silva Program in Medical Sciences, University of Taquari Valley - Univates, Lajeado, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Gabriela Laste Avelino Talini, 171-Universitário, Lajeado, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20261248

Keywords:

Cesarean section, Vaginal birth, Obstetric factors, Obstetric interventions, Unified health system

Abstract

Background: Cesarean rates have risen globally beyond recommended levels, without consistent improvements in maternal and neonatal outcomes. In Brazil, high rates persist despite policies promoting evidence-based, humanized care, with limited adherence in practice. This study aimed to identify factors associated with delivery mode in a hospital in southern Brazil to support vaginal birth and align practices with current recommendations.

Methods: A retrospective, descriptive, cross-sectional quantitative study was conducted based on the analysis of 1,485 medical records of parturients assisted through the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) who underwent vaginal or cesarean delivery between 2019 and 2021, in a hospital institution in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Maternal characteristics, clinical conditions, and obstetric practices were assessed. Logistic regression analysis was performed to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and identify variables associated with mode of delivery.

Results: Among the 1,485 medical records of parturients, 47.9% had a vaginal birth and 52.1% underwent a cesarean section. Primiparity, absence of cervical dilation upon admission, absence of desire for vaginal delivery, non-performance of amniotomy, administration of oxytocin, as well as non-pharmacological measures were significantly associated with a greater likelihood of cesarean section. Primiparous women were more likely to undergo a cesarean section (OR=2.97), while advanced cervical dilation (7–10 cm) markedly reduced the odds of cesarean delivery (OR=0.03). Maternal preference for vaginal birth, amniotomy, and the use of non-pharmacological measures were also protective factors against cesarean section.

Conclusions: In conclusion, cesarean delivery is influenced by modifiable clinical and care-related factors, highlighting opportunities to reduce unnecessary interventions. Promoting evidence-based, woman-centered practices may contribute to increasing vaginal birth rates and improving maternal and neonatal outcomes.

References

WHO. WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates. 2015. Available at :https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/who-statement-on-caesarean-section-rates-frequently-asked-questions. Accessed on 19 February 2026.

Pires RCR, Silveira VN da C, Leal M do C, Lamy ZC, Silva AAM da. Tendências temporais e projeções de cesariana no Brasil, macrorregiões administrativas e unidades federativas. Ciência and Saúde Coletiva. 2023;28(7):2119-33.

Betran AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Souza JP, Zhang J. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Global Health. 2021;6(6):e005671.

Célia Adriana Nicolotti, De T. Assistência hospitalar ao parto e nascimento: um Estudo de Avaliabilidade. Saúde em Debate. 2025;46(135):999-1014.

Vogel JP, Betrán AP, Vindevoghel N, Souza JP, Torloni MR, Zhang J, et al. Use of and disparities in caesarean sections in the WHO Multi-Country Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health. Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1341-8.

Alipour A, Hantoushzadeh S, Hessami K, Saleh M, Shariat M, Yazdizadeh B, et al. A global study of the association of cesarean rate and the role of socioeconomic status in neonatal mortality rate in the current century. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2022;22(1):616.

Assistência ao Parto Normal - Diretriz Nacional — Ministério da Saúde. 2025. Available at: https://www.gov.br/saude/ptbr/assuntos/pcdt/a/assistencia-ao-parto-normal-diretriz-nacional/view. Accessed on 19 February 2026.

Ministério da saúde Brasília -DF. 2001. Available at: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/parto.pdf. Accessed on 19 February 2026.

Alcântara N de A, Silva TJP. Obstetric practices in childbirth care and usual risk birth. Revista Brasileira de Saúde Materno Infantil. 2021;21(3):761-71.

Lopes T, Thamara G, Fernandes V, Maria A, Sousa M, Martins E, et al. Thales Philipe Rodrigues da Silva Kleyde Ventura de Souza. Rev Bras Enferm. 2021;74(4):20200397.

Gonçalves MOSS, Silva M de L, Silva JDA, Roxa GN, Tavares MJ de A, Pedro UNSF, et al. Fatores maternos relacionados à indicação de cesariana: uma revisão integrativa da literatura. Braz J Dev. 2021;7(1):2598-611.

Devy SR, Indriani D, Prasetyo B, Notobroto HB, Salim LA, Laksana MAC, et al. Determinants of cesarean section decision in Indonesia: a systematic review. Jurnal Promkes. 2024;12(1):129.

Ojo TT, Adeaga OO, Gbokan TA. Cesarean section: prevalence, determinants, and socio-cultural influences on decision-making. Int J Med Nurs Health Sci. 2025;6(1):67-93.

Vega ES. Rising Trends of Cesarean Section Worldwide: A Systematic Review. Obstet Gynecol Int J. 2015;3(2).

Damaceno NS, Marciano RP, Orsini MRCA. O imaginário materno sobre os partos cesáreo e vaginal. Psicol Ciênc Prof. 2021;41:e224530.

Tavina B, Rocha S, De R, Alves C, Campos I, Soares C, et al. Medidas não farmacológicas para alívio da dor do parto: revisão sistemática. 2023.

Trigueiro TH, Arruda KA de, Santos SD dos, Wall ML, Souza SRRK, Lima LS de. Experiência de gestantes na consulta de Enfermagem com a construção do plano de parto. Escola Anna Nery. 2022;26.

Rasador S, Abegg C. Factors associated with mode of delivery in a municipality in the northeast region of the State of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Rev Bras Saúde Mater Infant. 2019;19(4):807-15.

Clemente, De L. Indicação de cesariana baseada em evidências. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 2022.

Doğan E, Çevik S. Determining the impact of cervical dilation at admission on intrapartum interventions and labor satisfaction in pregnant women. J Educ Res Nurs. 2024;21(2):118-24.

Mouta RJO, Prata JA, Silva SC De SB, Zveiter M, Medina ET, Pereira AL de F, et al. A utilização da acupuntura na indução do trabalho de parto: uma revisão de escopo. Braz J Dev. 2021;7(8):83291-302.

Euzebio Klein B, Geremias Gouveia H. Use of non-pharmacological pain relief methods in labor. Cogitare Enfermagem. 2022;27:1-13.

Ministério da educação. Diretrizes de Atenção à Gestante: a operação cesariana. 2016. Available at: https://www.gov.br/conitec/ptbr/midias/relatorios/2016/relatorio_diretrizes-cesariana_final.pdf. Accessed on 19 February 2026.